Pole...


ve9dx <ve9dx@...>
 

Just on JT9-1 a short time but in 2 nights of listening much above 1838 plus 1500 hz is useless here. Due to a local noise.
About a half dozen in the log so far on 160 between 1838 plus 1400 and 1600 hz.
Also ran a few Europeans on 10.130 around noon time in the plus 1400 to 1500 hz area.
Haven't found JT9-1 on any other bands yet so will look forward to hearing what is being used where on the other bands.
K1CF just asked me to try JT9-2 - works - talk about long and drawn out though.
Sloooooooooow
Will be around 1838 plus 1500 most of the evening...
73 Andy (VE9DX)


John - kc2rxs
 

Hi Andy,

After you use JT9-2 for a QSO, JT9-1 seems fast.

There is some activity on 14.078, I made a few contacts there.

73, John - kc2rxs



On 11/9/2012 7:45 PM, ve9dx wrote:
 

Just on JT9-1 a short time but in 2 nights of listening much above 1838 plus 1500 hz is useless here. Due to a local noise.
About a half dozen in the log so far on 160 between 1838 plus 1400 and 1600 hz.
Also ran a few Europeans on 10.130 around noon time in the plus 1400 to 1500 hz area.
Haven't found JT9-1 on any other bands yet so will look forward to hearing what is being used where on the other bands.
K1CF just asked me to try JT9-2 - works - talk about long and drawn out though.
Sloooooooooow
Will be around 1838 plus 1500 most of the evening...
73 Andy (VE9DX)



ve9dx@...
 

John - Nice working you. Yes JT9-2 is Sloooow...! I will check out 14.078 next week. WAE RTTY this weekend so that part of the band will bee useless I am sure,
Likely do some more 30 tomorrow. Found noon yesterday good to Europe...
Have some issues with the program... Once rebooting all well again but had to do it several times during the afternoon.
Again many thanks for calling... 73 Andy


---- John - kc2rxs <johnd@empireone.net> wrote:

Hi Andy,

After you use JT9-2 for a QSO, JT9-1 seems fast.

There is some activity on 14.078, I made a few contacts there.

73, John - kc2rxs



On 11/9/2012 7:45 PM, ve9dx wrote:

Just on JT9-1 a short time but in 2 nights of listening much above
1838 plus 1500 hz is useless here. Due to a local noise.
About a half dozen in the log so far on 160 between 1838 plus 1400 and
1600 hz.
Also ran a few Europeans on 10.130 around noon time in the plus 1400
to 1500 hz area.
Haven't found JT9-1 on any other bands yet so will look forward to
hearing what is being used where on the other bands.
K1CF just asked me to try JT9-2 - works - talk about long and drawn
out though.
Sloooooooooow
Will be around 1838 plus 1500 most of the evening...
73 Andy (VE9DX)


KD7YZ Bob <kd7yz@...>
 

On 09-Nov-12 ve9dx sent, on a straight key:

Just on JT9-1 a short time but in 2 nights of listening much above
1838 plus 1500 hz is useless here. Due to a local noise.
Hi ndy. I would guess that the limited number of us initially on JT9 are
struggling to find openings in the segments of each general JT65 area.

You local noise, is it far wider than +/- 1838 +1500Hz?

It is break-of-day here in KY and I am 1839.5 +1300 calling CQ. on 1838
I am hammered by the JT65 guys operating essentially 1839 too. But with
the USB dial set to 1839.5 and then my offset of 1300, I can hear one
CQ'er but the tones arquite a bit Low and thus not really in the
perceived passband and not all over the screen, so to speak.

Were I lower, 1838, it would be left-to-right jt65 splatter.


K1CF just asked me to try JT9-2 - works - talk about long and drawn out though.
Sloooooooooow
yup. I tried it too. I am trying to work out the logic. yeah I would be
able to hear/collect/integrate and double my chances of a decode. The
flipside is that to transmit a solid 2 minutes I'd Quarter my ft950
output.

Here's one for all discussion.

I was just calling CQ on offset +1300 and Tx=QSO Freq.
N1HOQ did what I do a lot of the time, called me but at Offset +1500.

I double-click and set TX=QSO .. So I am actually now on his offset ..
he then does not respond in the next sequence.

I do that all to many times. It's like i expect the program to
automatically put me on caller's offset. Guess I'll eventually remember
to do it.



--

Bob KD7YZ


g3zxx
 

Hi Andy,

At least we finally made it on 30m.

There is still just a few of us, so I'm sure that activity will improve in time, as Joe gets the software really singing, and more individuals have a go.

Cheers & 73's
Dave, G3ZXX.

--- In WSJTX@yahoogroups.com, "ve9dx" <ve9dx@...> wrote:

Just on JT9-1 a short time but in 2 nights of listening much above 1838 plus 1500 hz is useless here. Due to a local noise.
About a half dozen in the log so far on 160 between 1838 plus 1400 and 1600 hz.
Also ran a few Europeans on 10.130 around noon time in the plus 1400 to 1500 hz area.
Haven't found JT9-1 on any other bands yet so will look forward to hearing what is being used where on the other bands.
K1CF just asked me to try JT9-2 - works - talk about long and drawn out though.
Sloooooooooow
Will be around 1838 plus 1500 most of the evening...
73 Andy (VE9DX)