Date
1 - 3 of 3
locked FST4 on 160m experiment / Calling CQ now! #FT4
Amos Sobel 4X4MF
Calling CQ now!
From: main@WSJTX.groups.io <main@WSJTX.groups.io> On Behalf Of Amos Sobel 4X4MF
Hi Folks!
|
|
Jim Brown
On 11/20/2020 11:03 AM, Amos Sobel 4X4MF wrote:
Join me in FST4 160m. This evening 19:00-22:00 UTC I will call CQ and listen:This period looks promising within EU, AF, and AS, but not for NA. How about 1 hour +/- your sunrise, which allows for propagation to NA and SA? I'd love to see all 160M operation move from FT8 to FST4. K1JT has observed that FST4-60 is 1.7 dB more sensitive than JT9. I've missed a lot of FT8 QSOs to EU from my QTH near San Francisco that these new modes have the potential to complete! 73, Jim K9YC
|
|
Amos Sobel 4X4MF
OK Jim
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I am using 160m FT8 almost every morning. On Oct 28, 2020, had the first and only one 160m QSO with the USA with a new antenna. I hope for many more. Starting tomorrow morning , I will be active on FST4 too. Amos 4X4MF
-----Original Message-----
From: main@WSJTX.groups.io <main@WSJTX.groups.io> On Behalf Of Jim Brown Sent: Friday, November 20, 2020 11:39 PM To: main@WSJTX.groups.io Subject: Re: [WSJTX] FST4 on 160m experiment / Calling CQ now! #FT4 On 11/20/2020 11:03 AM, Amos Sobel 4X4MF wrote: Join me in FST4 160m. This evening 19:00-22:00 UTC I will call CQ andThis period looks promising within EU, AF, and AS, but not for NA. How about 1 hour +/- your sunrise, which allows for propagation to NA and SA? I'd love to see all 160M operation move from FT8 to FST4. K1JT has observed that FST4-60 is 1.7 dB more sensitive than JT9. I've missed a lot of FT8 QSOs to EU from my QTH near San Francisco that these new modes have the potential to complete! 73, Jim K9YC
|
|