Locked Interesting double-decode
Bill Lederer
Folks:
Here is something I have seen a couple of times. A station is decoded on two frequencies at the same time, at vastly different db levels. Here are two examples from one station today: 200222_181830 7.074 Rx FT8 -8 0.1 1356 CQ K5DDE EN90 200222_181830 7.074 Tx FT8 0 0.0 650 CQ W8LVN EN62 200222_181830 7.074 Rx FT8 14 0.1 1476 CQ K5DDE EN90 200222_181900 7.074 Rx FT8 -8 0.1 1355 W8LVN K5DDE EN90 a2 200222_181900 7.074 Rx FT8 17 0.1 1476 W8LVN K5DDE EN90 On the order of 25 db difference, 120 hz difference. Curious what this might be caused by. Thanks, w8lvn |
|
On 22 Feb 2020 18:29, Bill Lederer <w8lvn.9@...> wrote: Folks: I've noticed this loads of times with both FT8 and PSK31. I assume it's an IMD construct where non-linearity or over-driving of the transmission is generating spurious decodable signals. Or maybe harmonics of the modulating audio? 73 Phil GM3ZZA -- 73 Phil GM3ZZA |
|
Jim Brown
On 2/22/2020 11:08 AM, Philip Rose via Groups.Io wrote:
Here is something I have seen a couple of times. A station is decoded on two frequencies at the same time, at vastly different db levels. Here are two examples from one stationThis can be caused by overload in the receive audio path between radio and computer sound card, and by overdrive in the station being double-decoded. If the difference is 120 Hz, it might be caused by power supply currents injected into the audio path, usually via the signal return (cable shield) when station equipment is not properly bonded. Double decodes like this can also be caused by Doppler, common for reflections from aircraft on higher bands (we see a lot on 6M). 73, Jim K9YC |
|
Reino Talarmo
Hi, That is normally generated by a power amplifier with less than perfect battery voltage regulation so that a full wave rectification leaves a 120 Hz sawtooth wave riding on top of the battery voltage. If the power amplifier is driven full, then result is 120 Hz sawtooth wave amplitude modulation. Sometimes there are multiple sidebands with 120 Hz spacing, in Europe 100 Hz spacing. 73, Reino oh3mA
From: WSJTX@groups.io [mailto:WSJTX@groups.io] On Behalf Of Bill Lederer
Folks: |
|
Bill Lederer
Well, the sum of the two frequencies is 2832. But if we presume that the faint one is a result of the IMD, then the 120 hz difference seems like it might be audio hum that is mixing with the primary, strongest signal. I think I'll analyze all my ALL.TXT files to see if there is a pattern in any of the doublings, and if there is ever a triple, since IMD should be sum and difference. w8lvn On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 1:09 PM Philip Rose via Groups.Io <pvrose=btinternet.com@groups.io> wrote:
-- --w8lvn-- |
|
Pa3gcu <pa3gcu@...>
Hi Phillip and all.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I’m glad that this topic has turned up again as when i commented (i think it was last year) i was told to check my own equipment or that was the general comment. A lot of water has passed under the bridge since then and i can’t exactly remember what was said. However i see this problem a lot, does not matter what band but what i do see is strong sigs on the waterfall. Normally i’m a reader and do not like to get involved in discussion’s but i felt i had to comment on this one. 73 Richard PA3GCU. Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone Op 22 feb. 2020 om 20:09 heeft Philip Rose via Groups.Io <pvrose@...> het volgende geschreven:
|
|
On 22 Feb 2020 19:21, Reino Talarmo <reino.talarmo@...> wrote:
Doesn't explain when the difference isn't 120 or 100 Hz. Phil GM3ZZA
-- 73 Phil GM3ZZA |
|
Nope, it's AC mains-related. If there's any significant 50Hz or 60Hz ripple coming out of the PSU (especially an SMPSU) on the DC line that's powering the rig, or if there's anything else in the shack that might be injecting a ripple signal somewhere in the audio signal chain, then this will be superimposed on the transmitted audio and will appear as a decodable 'sideband', in the case of the K5DDE decodes the spacing of the spurious signal is 2 x the AC line frequency.
It's not uncommon to see more than two spurii, I think I've seen up to four, all with spacings of exact multiples of the local AC mains frequency, on the signals emanated by some Eastern EU stations...! I can even see a signal 100Hz away from a nearby amateur's very strong FT8 signal; even though his unintentional sideband is approaching 40dB down on his fundamental signal I would prefer it if it weren't there at all. I've just found a very informative article on the subject; you''ll find it at: http://gm4fvm.blogspot.com/2019/11/ft8-and-100hz-ripple-strange-one-for-me.html -- Martin G0HDB |
|
Bill Lederer
So i am under the impression that switching mode power supplies don't operate at mains frequency, or at least their switching will spit off an array of frequencies due to the switching. AC Mains I can understand, but I think a switching mode power supply will emit some range of frequencies that may not be related to the mains frequency. w8lvn On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 1:37 PM Martin G0HDB <marting0hdb@...> wrote: Nope, it's AC mains-related. If there's any significant 50Hz or 60Hz ripple coming out of the PSU (especially an SMPSU) on the DC line that's powering the rig, or if there's anything else in the shack that might be injecting a ripple signal somewhere in the audio signal chain, then this will be superimposed on the transmitted audio and will appear as a decodable 'sideband', in the case of the K5DDE decodes the spacing of the spurious signal is 2 x the AC line frequency. -- --w8lvn-- |
|
Martin G0HDB <marting0hdb@...>
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 07:30 PM, Philip Rose wrote:
It's unusual but not impossible to see Doppler shifting aka aircraft scatter of signals on especially the higher HF bands; in such cases the spacing of the secondary signal will almost certainly not be a multiple of the AC line frequency. The effect is much more prominent, and more easily and more often observed, on 6m and higher. -- Martin G0HDB |
|
Bill Lederer
So that would be multipath then likely? On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 1:43 PM Martin G0HDB <marting0hdb@...> wrote: On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 07:30 PM, Philip Rose wrote: -- --w8lvn-- |
|
Jim, I didn't say that, I quoted someone saying that. Hence the > leading the line. And I agree with you it might be as much a problem in the receiver path as the transmitter path, the fact that only one of several strong signals suffer this indicates it's probably the transmitter path. 73 Phil GM3ZZA On 22 Feb 2020 19:20, Jim Brown <k9yc@...> wrote:
--
73 Phil GM3ZZA |
|
Martin G0HDB <marting0hdb@...>
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 07:48 PM, Bill Lederer wrote:
Yes, it's multipath but with the indirect or secondary path frequency-shifted because of the Doppler effect resulting from the movement of the aircraft. It's the same effect that's used in bistatic radar systems. -- Martin G0HDB |
|
Reino Talarmo
Hi Phil, Of course it does not. There are multiple reasons for additional sidebands such as Doppler shift due to airplane reflections, if also the direct signal is available (multipath). Then normally difference frequency is changing. By the way this is simple to simulate and results are close even on the relative power difference. Power supplies of tube amplifiers are seldom switching supplies and if rectifying diodes are not properly bypassed by a snubber, just a capacitor is fine, then those recovery peaks can propagate into anode voltage as well. 73, Reino oh3mA
From: WSJTX@groups.io [mailto:WSJTX@groups.io] On Behalf Of Philip Rose via Groups.Io
On 22 Feb 2020 19:21, Reino Talarmo <reino.talarmo@...> wrote:
Doesn't explain when the difference isn't 120 or 100 Hz.
Phil GM3ZZA
|
|
On 22 Feb 2020 19:43, Martin G0HDB <marting0hdb@...> wrote: So, I see the same signal being decoded several 100 Hz apart on 20m, is this a Doppler effect from what is probably the busiest air route in Europe?On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 07:30 PM, Philip Rose wrote: I still contend it's over-driving of transmitters. I keep my ALC less than 0dB on datamodes. 72 Phil GM3ZZA -- 73 Phil GM3ZZA |
|
Reino Talarmo
No it is an AM due to full wave rectification, poor DC filtering and overdriving power amplifier, at least in most cases. 73, Reino oh3mA
From: WSJTX@groups.io [mailto:WSJTX@groups.io] On Behalf Of Philip Rose via Groups.Io
On 22 Feb 2020 19:43, Martin G0HDB <marting0hdb@...> wrote:
So, I see the same signal being decoded several 100 Hz apart on 20m, is this a Doppler effect from what is probably the busiest air route in Europe?
I still contend it's over-driving of transmitters. I keep my ALC less than 0dB on datamodes.
72 Phil GM3ZZA
|
|
Martin G0HDB <marting0hdb@...>
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 07:57 PM, Philip Rose wrote:
The spacing of a Doppler-shifted signal on 20m is, in my opinion, extremely unlikely to ever reach several 100Hz; the plane causing the Doppler would probably need to be moving at hypersonic speeds! I have to confess I've never seen multiples of the same signal (other than those using FT8 Fox & Hounds mode or the MSHV software) with spacings of the several 100Hz you mention. In my experience, over-driving a transmitter's audio input usually results in harmonics of the eight FT8 tones that appear as one or more 'bar-code' signals elsewhere across the audio spectrum. Sadly this is very common. As for ALC, I believe FT8 uses a constant-amplitude waveform so I'm not sure what effect ALC might have on that; I wouldn't expect running with a degree of ALC to have any adverse effect on the purity of the transmitted signal. However, I recall there have been many previous discussions on this so I probably need to refresh my understanding of this aspect! Does ALC have any adverse effect on the quality of an RTTY signal, which is in effect a 2-tone FSK signal rather than the 8-tone (G)FSK signal used by FT8? -- Martin G0HDB |
|
Can we agree that this discussion is futile. There are numerous reasons why this happens. 73 Phil GM3ZZA. On 22 Feb 2020 19:56, Reino Talarmo <reino.talarmo@...> wrote:
-- 73 Phil GM3ZZA |
|
Bill Lederer
That is a great article. Thanks. On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 1:58 PM Martin G0HDB <marting0hdb@...> wrote:
-- --w8lvn-- |
|
On 22 Feb 2020 20:15, Martin G0HDB <marting0hdb@...> wrote: On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 07:57 PM, Philip Rose wrote: So this was sarcasm. The spacing of a Doppler-shifted signal on 20m is, in my opinion, extremely unlikely to ever reach several 100Hz; the plane causing the Doppler would probably need to be moving at hypersonic speeds! I have to confess I've never seen multiples of the same signal (other than those using FT8 Fox & Hounds mode or the MSHV software) with spacings of the several 100Hz you mention. I was suggesting that over-driving the pa would cause IMD constructs. I don't really understand the difference between digital modes. Just keep the ALC below zero.
-- 73 Phil GM3ZZA |
|