|
locked
Performance of FST4-120 vs that of WSPR
#FST4
#WSPR
Hi Mike, FST4W-120 is about 1.4 dB more sensitive than WSPR. I was part of the alpha test team for FST4 and FST4W. Extensive comparisons on 2200 meters under real world conditions showed that FST4W go
Hi Mike, FST4W-120 is about 1.4 dB more sensitive than WSPR. I was part of the alpha test team for FST4 and FST4W. Extensive comparisons on 2200 meters under real world conditions showed that FST4W go
|
By
N1BUG
· #31980
·
|
|
locked
Answering FTx CQ with Tx2-message
#QSO_practices
Well, we are all different. When responding to others I usually start with TX1 unless I see that they are responding to and perhaps preferring callers who start with TX2 (as is often the case with sem
Well, we are all different. When responding to others I usually start with TX1 unless I see that they are responding to and perhaps preferring callers who start with TX2 (as is often the case with sem
|
By
N1BUG
· #31747
·
|
|
locked
Update affect on multiple instances
#install
#Windows10
I run several instances of WSJT-X under Windows 10 by specifying a rig-name parameter in the shortcut for each instance. I have never had an update break any of that but with anything computer related
I run several instances of WSJT-X under Windows 10 by specifying a rig-name parameter in the shortcut for each instance. I have never had an update break any of that but with anything computer related
|
By
N1BUG
· #31185
·
|
|
locked
Multiple instances of WSJT-X on Windows machine.
#WSJTX_config
#Windows07
Hi Peter, Check to be certain every instance specifies a unique rig-name parameter. The behavior you report with the decode light staying on will happen if any instance does not have a unique rig-name
Hi Peter, Check to be certain every instance specifies a unique rig-name parameter. The behavior you report with the decode light staying on will happen if any instance does not have a unique rig-name
|
By
N1BUG
· #29017
·
|
|
locked
FST4 modes with TS-890S - slow RF envelope rise problem
#txaudio
Well said, Peter. Karl, I was not suggesting it be changed for one person. There are already several affected by this and the FST4(W) mode is new, not even out in a GA release yet. There will be more
Well said, Peter. Karl, I was not suggesting it be changed for one person. There are already several affected by this and the FST4(W) mode is new, not even out in a GA release yet. There will be more
|
By
N1BUG
· #20367
·
|
|
locked
FST4 modes with TS-890S - slow RF envelope rise problem
#txaudio
Hi all, Rik, thanks for sharing your driver circuit. I can't really say I understand it yet, but I will save it for reference. Peter, I would be interested to see your first circuit and also the one y
Hi all, Rik, thanks for sharing your driver circuit. I can't really say I understand it yet, but I will save it for reference. Peter, I would be interested to see your first circuit and also the one y
|
By
N1BUG
· #20234
·
|
|
locked
FST4 modes with TS-890S - slow RF envelope rise problem
#txaudio
Hello Rik, Chris, Peter, The different rise times depending on T/R period might explain why some appear to be OK for me while others do not. Very strange things can happen when you start putting some
Hello Rik, Chris, Peter, The different rise times depending on T/R period might explain why some appear to be OK for me while others do not. Very strange things can happen when you start putting some
|
By
N1BUG
· #20196
·
|
|
locked
FST4 modes with TS-890S - slow RF envelope rise problem
#txaudio
This is interesting. I was part of the early FST4/W test group but I never realized this ramped amplitude was happening. In general I would say it is not good news with class D and E amplifiers which
This is interesting. I was part of the early FST4/W test group but I never realized this ramped amplitude was happening. In general I would say it is not good news with class D and E amplifiers which
|
By
N1BUG
· #20141
·
|
|
locked
Added complexity when transmitting while multiple WSJT-X instances are running on a station with a shared TX resource with 2.3.0-rc2
As a follow-up, I have been informed this is not supported if you are using CAT control. I have no need for and do not use CAT on LF or MF, so I was unaware of that. It seems my "solution" may not wor
As a follow-up, I have been informed this is not supported if you are using CAT control. I have no need for and do not use CAT on LF or MF, so I was unaware of that. It seems my "solution" may not wor
|
By
N1BUG
· #18657
·
|
|
locked
Added complexity when transmitting while multiple WSJT-X instances are running on a station with a shared TX resource with 2.3.0-rc2
Hi Clint, Bill, and all. This was a really big and disappointing change for me as well. If there were no workaround it forced a complete rethinking of operating practices, but no matter how I thought
Hi Clint, Bill, and all. This was a really big and disappointing change for me as well. If there were no workaround it forced a complete rethinking of operating practices, but no matter how I thought
|
By
N1BUG
· #18655
·
|