Ok, then let me check my freq list: 1839.5 -(Too much powerline noise here for me to use) 3578. (or is it 3581.) 7039. (or is it 7074.?) 10.130 14.078 28.078 Any additions? Like 15meters? Are we in ag

NICE, this one worked perfect right after install. Copying 2227 10 -4 2.7 1472. 0 KJ1J W4ED 73 As I write, on 30m, 10.130 +1472 Steinar Aanesland wrote:

I can see signals, hear signals, and they dont decode. Why, I dont know, but I believe the program is broke for more than one reason, and not ready for prime time yet. qrpbear wrote:

I dont use a com port, I use Vox, and as I said, when it works, it works just fine. Ive made contacts. Phil Williams wrote:

Well, when one dedicates ONE computer to the hamshack, one reasonably expects it to work there, not have to be changed out for a given program. It runs HRD to talk to my FT-450, all my digital program

Ive had repeated problems with the wide display changing from the default, to the hot-red, to the linrad, to the"blue" which looks grey here. I have limited vision, and would prefer the "wide" display

I avoid the stalker-spy networks like facebook. Garbage in my book. Phil Williams wrote:

Yeah, Im idling watching it now, trying to catch something on 40m. My display just flipped as usual, from the nice-readable dark blue on the wideband window, to the puke green I cant see. I sure wish

I dont think Joe Taylor (the author) is on here, but I DO see him often on the digital forum on Obriensweb. http://www.obriensweb.com/sked/index.php?board=digitalradio That site is very helpful when s

Our power company (National Grid) is a bunch of incompetents who cant manage to keep the streetlights on let alone find RFI. When I file complaints, I'm lucky to even hear at all from them. When I DO

Mike, I come to find out theres a newer version, I downloaded/installed it and noticed two things, first the dark blue initial waterfall screen stayed put unlike the prev version which changed randoml

Ill try tomorrow. Dave and I sat on 40m, tonite, I found out a had an old copy of WSJTX and on upgrade, I was able to copy a couple guys incoming. I sent cq for a while, and observed myself on my serv

I can concur with all that Mike, but job #1 is to get a signal, see what it looks like and commence a contact, even IF its not under conditions the mode may very well be able to support. Right now Ive

As an aside, I worked with Lentus last winter. Lentus requires a close time sync, and many thought it would limit itself to the lower freqs, but in experimentation, we were able to use it up to and th

Problem IS, 160 is NOT an option for many of us in urban environs. I for example could hear you guys last night on 160 by ear, but the pulsating line noise (insulator arc-over) made decoding impossibl

Roger that. John - kc2rxs wrote:

Super, thanks John. I'll be trying 30m tonite, prob after 7pm EST, 00:00Z John - kc2rxs wrote:

160 is terribly noisy for me here, Im in the city and the only time its usable is mid winter. is anyone doing JT9 on 30 meters? If so what freq, Id like to try tonight to see someone. Im assuming it w

Thanks Phil, but Im not looking for JT65, got several programs that run that. I was referring to the JT9 stuff. I got a bunch of replies and got the right software now. Thanks all. That was easy once

Yes, I saw that and will go grab the new one. Where I'm having trouble is I see NO MODES called JT9-anything. Are these the JT4-a thru Jt4-G? That alone would shed a bunch of light on my frustrations.