Hello all, Ive got WSJT 9 setup, and it looks much like the V7 I have. What modes are we talking about here? I hate to sound stupid, but from what Ive been reading on this list, I see everything from

Heck John, I think I'm stupid on this one, I'm also playing with ROS, and wow talk about a lot of NON-information "so much you read quickly can" groan... I used the WSJT7 on WSPR and JT65 before, I kn

Yes, I saw that and will go grab the new one. Where I'm having trouble is I see NO MODES called JT9-anything. Are these the JT4-a thru Jt4-G? That alone would shed a bunch of light on my frustrations.

Thanks Phil, but Im not looking for JT65, got several programs that run that. I was referring to the JT9 stuff. I got a bunch of replies and got the right software now. Thanks all. That was easy once

160 is terribly noisy for me here, Im in the city and the only time its usable is mid winter. is anyone doing JT9 on 30 meters? If so what freq, Id like to try tonight to see someone. Im assuming it w

Super, thanks John. I'll be trying 30m tonite, prob after 7pm EST, 00:00Z John - kc2rxs wrote:

Roger that. John - kc2rxs wrote:

Problem IS, 160 is NOT an option for many of us in urban environs. I for example could hear you guys last night on 160 by ear, but the pulsating line noise (insulator arc-over) made decoding impossibl

As an aside, I worked with Lentus last winter. Lentus requires a close time sync, and many thought it would limit itself to the lower freqs, but in experimentation, we were able to use it up to and th

I can concur with all that Mike, but job #1 is to get a signal, see what it looks like and commence a contact, even IF its not under conditions the mode may very well be able to support. Right now Ive

Ill try tomorrow. Dave and I sat on 40m, tonite, I found out a had an old copy of WSJTX and on upgrade, I was able to copy a couple guys incoming. I sent cq for a while, and observed myself on my serv

Mike, I come to find out theres a newer version, I downloaded/installed it and noticed two things, first the dark blue initial waterfall screen stayed put unlike the prev version which changed randoml

Our power company (National Grid) is a bunch of incompetents who cant manage to keep the streetlights on let alone find RFI. When I file complaints, I'm lucky to even hear at all from them. When I DO

I dont think Joe Taylor (the author) is on here, but I DO see him often on the digital forum on Obriensweb. http://www.obriensweb.com/sked/index.php?board=digitalradio That site is very helpful when s

Yeah, Im idling watching it now, trying to catch something on 40m. My display just flipped as usual, from the nice-readable dark blue on the wideband window, to the puke green I cant see. I sure wish

I avoid the stalker-spy networks like facebook. Garbage in my book. Phil Williams wrote:

Ive had repeated problems with the wide display changing from the default, to the hot-red, to the linrad, to the"blue" which looks grey here. I have limited vision, and would prefer the "wide" display

Well, when one dedicates ONE computer to the hamshack, one reasonably expects it to work there, not have to be changed out for a given program. It runs HRD to talk to my FT-450, all my digital program

I dont use a com port, I use Vox, and as I said, when it works, it works just fine. Ive made contacts. Phil Williams wrote:

I can see signals, hear signals, and they dont decode. Why, I dont know, but I believe the program is broke for more than one reason, and not ready for prime time yet. qrpbear wrote: