Date   

Locked Re: #q65 Mode q65 on 6 meters #Q65

Hasan Schiers N0AN
 

The information posted from me was for a VERY early version of Q65 and the software has changed dramatically for the better.

Months of testing every morning with KB7IJ, NM3G, WB4HIE, and K5GZR have pretty much resulted in the following conclusions. (Path lengths 600 to 900 miles)

Averaging should be left on all the time now.
Decoding while monitoring works much better than it did.
Decoding while monitoring still works better if the signal you are looking for is inside the F Tol setting. Once you are in QSO, F Tol can be as narrow as you like and your equipment permits (stability)
For schedules, always put the Call and Grid in, before starting the QSO. Don't call CQ, call the person you are skeding with.  This invokes AP decoding immediately.

Reports like q0 indicate AP decoding is not running because you don't have call/grid entered)
Reports like q3 indicate AP decoding is working
Reports like q32 indicate AP and Averaging are working the 2 means 2 sequences average)

Q65 Settings for 15A, 30B, 120E

Always hit F4 key to clear collected junk before starting a performance run
Always hit Clear Avg button before starting a new QSO if evaluating performance
F Tol 50 Hz (can be set lower for schedules)
Decode: Fast, Enable Averaging, Auto-Clear Average After Decode

Notice: at bottom of Decode Screen (next to Current Mode Listing) two numerical boxes. These show skipped frames (number of frames since last decode). This is a VERY good indication of decode efficiency when manipulating power levels) Which number increments or goes to 0 with a decode depends on whether you are on 1st or 2nd ...


Q65 30A (30 sec sequences with Submode A) is still the standard on 50.275 (USA)
Q65 120E (120 sec sequences with Submode E) is on 50.235, and most sensitive for qrp on 6m (not EME)

Latest testing shows: (we have been testing 15A for several weeks every morning for about an hour)

Q65-15A works quite well for schedules. We have been working every morning at 666 miles with the far end at 5-10 watts and me at 20-30 watts (he has noise), and getting about 85% decodes on my end and he is getting about 40 to 50 percent decodes on his. He is using 7 EL @ 50', I am using 5 EL at 60', both fed with hardline. Both are LFAs  

Q65-30B works better than 30A, and very obviously so. (not night and day, but easy to see) 
     1 to 3  watts on the far end produces > 60% decodes 
Q65-30A works marginally, but not dramatically better than Q65-15A

Q65-15A works better than MSK144 during non-shower times (testing from pre-sunrise to about an hour after sunrise) It is clearly superior. We have repeatedly compared how much power and how much time it takes to complete a qso or to get a series of decodes using MSK144 vs Q65-15A.

Q65-15A requires MUCH less power to generate decodes than MSK144...by well over 5 dB. 
    It's message averaging works extremely well.
Q65-15A will complete the QSO in fewer sequences than MSK144
Q65-15A will generate  more sequences with decodes than MSK144 (by that we mean, 15 second sequences where no decode appears)

If there are a LOT (like in a shower), of meteors, then MSK144 is still faster to complete than Q65-15A or 30B

For typical early morning conditions, both Q65-30A and 15A are clearly superior to MSK144 in that they require significantly less power to generate more sequences that produce decodes. 

One might wonder WHY is Q65 better under most conditions than MSK144 on 6m terrestrial?

Here is our theory, but it is speculation.

MSK144 is optimized for meteors. It will respond to other modes of propagation, but for some reason, not as efficiently as Q65. (efficiency defined by low power performance)  Sustained sporadic E is an exception, as it acts like a perfect mirror and MSK144 loves it...but since MSK144 depends on time division multiplexing, a common frequency becomes unusable very quickly.

Q65 seems to make use of all propagation modes, it does not care. It acts like a funnel. All of these propagation modes efficiently contribute to a decode in Q65:

Ionoscatter
Troposcatter
Tropoducting
Meteor Scatter
Sporadic E
Airplane Scatter

In summary: Do Not Run 120E or 30B on 50.275!

120E is magical, but way long and hard on equipment.
30B works nearly as well as 120E
30A is the 'standard' on 275 and is most likely to generate a response to a CQ

15A works surprisingly well. So well, we have stopped running tests on 30B and only rarely test on 120E for special super qrp stuff.

We have been running 30A and 15A on 275 if it is not busy, trying to generate more 15A activity.
We run 120E and 30B on 50.235

Hopefully, this will help people get the most out of Q65 on 6m for terrestrial work.

73, N0AN

p.s., I'm going to post this information in it's own thread, as it might get lost in this one.

Hasan


On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 9:55 PM D. Scott MacKenzie <kb0fhp@...> wrote:
That is not quite correct.  It will spot CW/SSB if the receiving op spots it.  However, with the digital modes, it is for the most part done automatically

-----Original Message-----
From: main@WSJTX.groups.io <main@WSJTX.groups.io> On Behalf Of Jim Brown
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 2021 10:06 PM
To: main@WSJTX.groups.io
Subject: Re: [WSJTX] #q65 Mode q65 on 6 meters

On 6/1/2021 5:08 PM, Ted wrote:
> Bill, you may want to watch DX Maps for the next few days…6 is open
> big time !!

Even better, watch PSKReporter, requesting sent/received by Anyone on 6M in the last 15 minutes. While it won't see CW or SSB activity, it provides a great display of propagation in near real time. Most users of WSJT modes report receptions to this site.

73, Jim K9YC





Locked Re: #q65 Mode q65 on 6 meters #Q65

D. Scott MacKenzie
 

That is not quite correct. It will spot CW/SSB if the receiving op spots it. However, with the digital modes, it is for the most part done automatically

-----Original Message-----
From: main@WSJTX.groups.io <main@WSJTX.groups.io> On Behalf Of Jim Brown
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 2021 10:06 PM
To: main@WSJTX.groups.io
Subject: Re: [WSJTX] #q65 Mode q65 on 6 meters

On 6/1/2021 5:08 PM, Ted wrote:
Bill, you may want to watch DX Maps for the next few days…6 is open
big time !!
Even better, watch PSKReporter, requesting sent/received by Anyone on 6M in the last 15 minutes. While it won't see CW or SSB activity, it provides a great display of propagation in near real time. Most users of WSJT modes report receptions to this site.

73, Jim K9YC


Locked Re: #q65 Mode q65 on 6 meters #Q65

Jim Brown
 

On 6/1/2021 6:06 PM, Dick wrote:
What is it about this new Mode (Q65) that makes it superior to
FT8 or FT4 ?
See the Quick Start Guide for Q65, on the WSJT-X website.

Likewise for FST4, introduced in the prior general release.

73, Jim K9YC


Locked Re: #q65 Mode q65 on 6 meters #Q65

Jim Brown
 

On 6/1/2021 5:08 PM, Ted wrote:
Bill, you may want to watch DX Maps for the next few days…6 is open big time !!
Even better, watch PSKReporter, requesting sent/received by Anyone on 6M in the last 15 minutes. While it won't see CW or SSB activity, it provides a great display of propagation in near real time. Most users of WSJT modes report receptions to this site.

73, Jim K9YC


Locked Re: #q65 Mode q65 on 6 meters #Q65

Buddy Morgan
 


You can work with much weaker signals, with Q65, than with FT8. Here in the Southeastern United States, on Monday evenings, we have "FT8 Activity Night". We start on 144.174 MHz and then move to other bands and modes. This week, I tried working Kim, WG8S - 519 miles away - on FT8. We could not make it. Switched to Q65-30C and completed a contact. I never heard Kim. I never saw his signal on the waterfall. He decoded @-29. But, we completed a QSO. Q65 is going to be a very good mode!

Buddy WB4OMG



-----Original Message-----
From: Dick <w1ksz@...>
To: main@WSJTX.groups.io <main@WSJTX.groups.io>
Sent: Tue, Jun 1, 2021 9:06 pm
Subject: Re: [WSJTX] #q65 Mode q65 on 6 meters

And yet another Digital Mode ...

What is it about this new Mode (Q65) that makes it superior to
FT8 or FT4 ?

Tnx es 73, Dick, W1KSZ


Locked Re: #q65 Mode q65 on 6 meters #Q65

Dick
 

And yet another Digital Mode ...

What is it about this new Mode (Q65) that makes it superior to
FT8 or FT4 ?

Tnx es 73, Dick, W1KSZ


From: main@WSJTX.groups.io <main@WSJTX.groups.io> on behalf of Ted <k7trkradio@...>
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 2021 5:37 PM
To: main@WSJTX.groups.io <main@WSJTX.groups.io>
Cc: william.lederer@... <william.lederer@...>
Subject: Re: [WSJTX] #q65 Mode q65 on 6 meters
 

Also, Bill, here is some valuable info that was given to me by Hasan….basically, it is “Q65 for Dummies”  (ME, being the dummy):

Ted,

Yes data should be showing in the left window if you are decoding anyone. It will look like any other mode in WSJT-X. So in the window you showed, you have not decoded anyone.

 

Every T/R period is its own MODE, so you cannot just change T/R willy nilly. Each mode has its own frequency , pretty much.

 

The most common mode for beginners is 30A , which you run on 50.275

 

That is a T/R of 30 and Submode A.

 

For now, forget about Message Averaging...you are bound to forget you left it on and it will reduce your monitoring decodes.

 

Your best bet is to monitor 50.275 Q65-30A for signals. Until you start seeing waterfall sparkles and decode stations, there isn't much point calling CQ (your settings could be all messed up, in which case you will just qrm others). Listen first, then when you have a feel for what is going on, call someone you hear. 

 

73, N0AN

 

Hasan

 

 

On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 4:54 PM <k7trkradio@...> wrote:

Hi, where is ‘enable Averaging” ?  also, for normal CQ, what is the best T/R setting

Thanks,

 

Ted

 

From: Hasan N0AN
Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2021 2:41 PM
To: Ted <k7trkradio@...>
Subject: Re: Q65

 

Hi Ted,

 

the A in 30A is Submode A, which you have selected correctly for Q65-30A on 50.275

 

If you are going to run a sked with someone with really weak signals anticipated go to 50.235 and select T/R 120 and Submode E

 

also known as 120E

 

Basic settings:

 

Decode = FAST (not Deep), Enable Averaging OFF , F Tol 20 Hz  

Those are settings for monitoring the passband for all signals.

 

For a qso, pretype in Call and Grid, Turn Enable Averaging ON, F Tol stays at 20 Hz.

 

When finished, turn enable Averaging off, and clear the DXCall and Grid by hitting F4

 

This will give you the best sensitivity for monitoring and the best performance while in QSO

 

73, N0AN

Hasan

 

 

On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 4:30 PM <k7trkradio@...> wrote:

Hi Hasan,

 

Would appreciate some help. Attached is a snip of my setup. Is this correct?

 

I do not see any setting for ‘30A’ as discussed in the emails on the Group…

 

Thank you and 73,

Ted

K7TRK

 

 

From: main@WSJTX.groups.io On Behalf Of Bill Lederer
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 2021 5:12 PM
To: main@wsjtx.groups.io
Subject: Re: [WSJTX] #q65 Mode q65 on 6 meters

 

Thanks, I will.

 

 

On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 7:08 PM Ted <k7trkradio@...> wrote:

Bill, you may want to watch DX Maps for the next few days…6 is open big time !!    QSO/SWL real time maps and lists (dxmaps.com)

 

73, Ted, K7TRK

 

From: main@WSJTX.groups.io On Behalf Of Bill Lederer
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 2021 5:02 PM
To: main@wsjtx.groups.io
Subject: Re: [WSJTX] #q65 Mode q65 on 6 meters

 

Sure.

 

Good to hear from you.

 

I have k3s attached to 80 meter dipole with second antenna either 20 or 160 (dipole), and my FT 1000 MP MK5 always on 40 meters to a dipole.  I have them running pretty much all the time--I can just glance over to see what is happening. So I can work stuff while working on paying projects. The 80 meter dipole works well on 80, and can work on 60, 30, 15, 10 and 6 meters.  Just ping me here, and we can  check it out. I don't check this email as often as I should, but william.lederer@... is constantly in my pocket.

 

73

 

On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 3:59 PM Larry Koziel <k8mu599mi@...> wrote:

Bill,

Let's give it a try some time. I just installed v2.4.0 a few days ago but haven't seen any signals yet. It could be because I just haven't listened long enough or seriously enough or at the right times. I also don't have a 6 meter antenna. But that hasn't prevented me from confirming 44 states and 11 entities (12 when PJ4 -- which I worked yesterday -- confirms on LOTW). I've been using vertical antennas -- an 80-10 meter Outbacker and more recently a 20-10 Bravo-5 and phone, CW and FT8. So Q65 should be a good fit for me. My antennas are the definition of weak signal.

73,

Larry K8MU EN82ml

 

 

 


 

--

--w8lvn--




 

--

--w8lvn--


Locked Re: #q65 Mode q65 on 6 meters #Q65

 

Also, Bill, here is some valuable info that was given to me by Hasan….basically, it is “Q65 for Dummies”  (ME, being the dummy):

Ted,

Yes data should be showing in the left window if you are decoding anyone. It will look like any other mode in WSJT-X. So in the window you showed, you have not decoded anyone.

 

Every T/R period is its own MODE, so you cannot just change T/R willy nilly. Each mode has its own frequency , pretty much.

 

The most common mode for beginners is 30A , which you run on 50.275

 

That is a T/R of 30 and Submode A.

 

For now, forget about Message Averaging...you are bound to forget you left it on and it will reduce your monitoring decodes.

 

Your best bet is to monitor 50.275 Q65-30A for signals. Until you start seeing waterfall sparkles and decode stations, there isn't much point calling CQ (your settings could be all messed up, in which case you will just qrm others). Listen first, then when you have a feel for what is going on, call someone you hear. 

 

73, N0AN

 

Hasan

 

 

On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 4:54 PM <k7trkradio@...> wrote:

Hi, where is ‘enable Averaging” ?  also, for normal CQ, what is the best T/R setting

Thanks,

 

Ted

 

From: Hasan N0AN
Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2021 2:41 PM
To: Ted <k7trkradio@...>
Subject: Re: Q65

 

Hi Ted,

 

the A in 30A is Submode A, which you have selected correctly for Q65-30A on 50.275

 

If you are going to run a sked with someone with really weak signals anticipated go to 50.235 and select T/R 120 and Submode E

 

also known as 120E

 

Basic settings:

 

Decode = FAST (not Deep), Enable Averaging OFF , F Tol 20 Hz  

Those are settings for monitoring the passband for all signals.

 

For a qso, pretype in Call and Grid, Turn Enable Averaging ON, F Tol stays at 20 Hz.

 

When finished, turn enable Averaging off, and clear the DXCall and Grid by hitting F4

 

This will give you the best sensitivity for monitoring and the best performance while in QSO

 

73, N0AN

Hasan

 

 

On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 4:30 PM <k7trkradio@...> wrote:

Hi Hasan,

 

Would appreciate some help. Attached is a snip of my setup. Is this correct?

 

I do not see any setting for ‘30A’ as discussed in the emails on the Group…

 

Thank you and 73,

Ted

K7TRK

 

 

From: main@WSJTX.groups.io On Behalf Of Bill Lederer
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 2021 5:12 PM
To: main@wsjtx.groups.io
Subject: Re: [WSJTX] #q65 Mode q65 on 6 meters

 

Thanks, I will.

 

 

On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 7:08 PM Ted <k7trkradio@...> wrote:

Bill, you may want to watch DX Maps for the next few days…6 is open big time !!    QSO/SWL real time maps and lists (dxmaps.com)

 

73, Ted, K7TRK

 

From: main@WSJTX.groups.io On Behalf Of Bill Lederer
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 2021 5:02 PM
To: main@wsjtx.groups.io
Subject: Re: [WSJTX] #q65 Mode q65 on 6 meters

 

Sure.

 

Good to hear from you.

 

I have k3s attached to 80 meter dipole with second antenna either 20 or 160 (dipole), and my FT 1000 MP MK5 always on 40 meters to a dipole.  I have them running pretty much all the time--I can just glance over to see what is happening. So I can work stuff while working on paying projects. The 80 meter dipole works well on 80, and can work on 60, 30, 15, 10 and 6 meters.  Just ping me here, and we can  check it out. I don't check this email as often as I should, but william.lederer@... is constantly in my pocket.

 

73

 

On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 3:59 PM Larry Koziel <k8mu599mi@...> wrote:

Bill,

Let's give it a try some time. I just installed v2.4.0 a few days ago but haven't seen any signals yet. It could be because I just haven't listened long enough or seriously enough or at the right times. I also don't have a 6 meter antenna. But that hasn't prevented me from confirming 44 states and 11 entities (12 when PJ4 -- which I worked yesterday -- confirms on LOTW). I've been using vertical antennas -- an 80-10 meter Outbacker and more recently a 20-10 Bravo-5 and phone, CW and FT8. So Q65 should be a good fit for me. My antennas are the definition of weak signal.

73,

Larry K8MU EN82ml

 

 

 


 

--

--w8lvn--




 

--

--w8lvn--


Locked Re: #q65 Mode q65 on 6 meters #Q65

Bill Lederer
 

Thanks, I will.


On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 7:08 PM Ted <k7trkradio@...> wrote:

Bill, you may want to watch DX Maps for the next few days…6 is open big time !!    QSO/SWL real time maps and lists (dxmaps.com)

 

73, Ted, K7TRK

 

From: main@WSJTX.groups.io On Behalf Of Bill Lederer
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 2021 5:02 PM
To: main@wsjtx.groups.io
Subject: Re: [WSJTX] #q65 Mode q65 on 6 meters

 

Sure.

 

Good to hear from you.

 

I have k3s attached to 80 meter dipole with second antenna either 20 or 160 (dipole), and my FT 1000 MP MK5 always on 40 meters to a dipole.  I have them running pretty much all the time--I can just glance over to see what is happening. So I can work stuff while working on paying projects. The 80 meter dipole works well on 80, and can work on 60, 30, 15, 10 and 6 meters.  Just ping me here, and we can  check it out. I don't check this email as often as I should, but william.lederer@... is constantly in my pocket.

 

73

 

On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 3:59 PM Larry Koziel <k8mu599mi@...> wrote:

Bill,

Let's give it a try some time. I just installed v2.4.0 a few days ago but haven't seen any signals yet. It could be because I just haven't listened long enough or seriously enough or at the right times. I also don't have a 6 meter antenna. But that hasn't prevented me from confirming 44 states and 11 entities (12 when PJ4 -- which I worked yesterday -- confirms on LOTW). I've been using vertical antennas -- an 80-10 meter Outbacker and more recently a 20-10 Bravo-5 and phone, CW and FT8. So Q65 should be a good fit for me. My antennas are the definition of weak signal.

73,

Larry K8MU EN82ml

 

 




 

--

--w8lvn--






--
--w8lvn--


Locked Re: Import Hamlib #Cat_RigControl

Dave Garber <ve3wej@...>
 

just a maybe, but when I used my signalink, not keying was due to low audio, if you are not transmitting in the center of the band.  see if 'fake it' is on, recommended.

i did not use cat for ptt. cat was only for frequency/band selection


Dave Garber
VE3WEJ / VE3IE


On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 2:01 PM <rod@...> wrote:
Hi, I'm running a TS2000 and I'm getting the same error message that bob posted in msg  #25374 (Command rejected by the rig) when I tried upgrading to WSJT-X v2.4.0   I can receive and decode with no problem, but the radio will not TX using my SignaLink with VOX as normal, or trying to use CAT control, or DTS/DTR.  Changing the mode or split operation settings also has no effect.

If I change frequency on the radio WSJT-X has a delay of a couple of seconds or so, before it catches up with the radio, this has always been instant in previous versions.

I also have a couple of other rigs, Yaesu & Icom which use VOX keying with no problems.



Locked Re: Low power output with 2.4.0 and IC-7300 #Cat_RigControl

Tom V. Segalstad
 

Sine time ago I had a similar problem with sound from the speakers in a laptop PC, which should use the sound with the transceiver only.

The laptop PC had a 4-pole jack for external headphones/speakers and microphone. So I simply plugged a 4-pole jack-plug, with nothing connected, into the audio jack -- and this little jack-plug silenced the PC's speakers -- and all audio was now just between the PC and the transceiver.

73 and good luck from Tom, LA4LN

Sent from Outlook Mobile


From: main@WSJTX.groups.io <main@WSJTX.groups.io> on behalf of Philip Rose via groups.io <gm3zza@...>
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 2021 10:26:01 PM
To: main@WSJTX.groups.io <main@WSJTX.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [WSJTX] Low power output with 2.4.0 and IC-7300 #Cat_RigControl
 

I doubt it’s IC-7300 specific. The IC-7300 shouldn’t direct its TX audio back to the computer. It must be something in Windows that is directing the WSJT-X audio both to the rig and the speakers, but I don’t know of a mechanism that can do that.

 

On second thoughts maybe the TX monitor facility feeds back into the computer audio, if you have the rig speakers feeding into the PC line-in or microphone? I don’t have TX monitor enabled on USB-D on my 7300.

 

73 Phil GM3ZZA

 

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

 

From: Gary - AG0N
Sent: 01 June 2021 19:02
To: main@wsjtx.groups.io
Subject: Re: [WSJTX] Low power output with 2.4.0 and IC-7300 #Cat_RigControl

 

 



On May 31, 2021, at 6:17 PM, Carl Licari-NX5T <cjlicari@...> wrote:

 

Ok, I did that and now have full output power from the radio, BUT, I also have the transmit tone emitting from my computer speakers that is SO loud my dogs are howling, lol. The problem is if I lower the volume on either the speakers or the mixer the output power drops. Any ideas how to fix this??

 

You are NOT configured correctly if your speakers are belting out your transmit OR receive tones.  Someone familiar with the 7300 configuration will need to help you.  You should not hear any of your transmit or receive tones, except coming out of the radio itself.

 

Gary - AG0N

 


--
73 Phil GM3ZZA

--
Tom (LA4LN)


Locked Re: #q65 Mode q65 on 6 meters #Q65

 

Bill, you may want to watch DX Maps for the next few days…6 is open big time !!    QSO/SWL real time maps and lists (dxmaps.com)

 

73, Ted, K7TRK

 

From: main@WSJTX.groups.io On Behalf Of Bill Lederer
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 2021 5:02 PM
To: main@wsjtx.groups.io
Subject: Re: [WSJTX] #q65 Mode q65 on 6 meters

 

Sure.

 

Good to hear from you.

 

I have k3s attached to 80 meter dipole with second antenna either 20 or 160 (dipole), and my FT 1000 MP MK5 always on 40 meters to a dipole.  I have them running pretty much all the time--I can just glance over to see what is happening. So I can work stuff while working on paying projects. The 80 meter dipole works well on 80, and can work on 60, 30, 15, 10 and 6 meters.  Just ping me here, and we can  check it out. I don't check this email as often as I should, but william.lederer@... is constantly in my pocket.

 

73

 

On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 3:59 PM Larry Koziel <k8mu599mi@...> wrote:

Bill,

Let's give it a try some time. I just installed v2.4.0 a few days ago but haven't seen any signals yet. It could be because I just haven't listened long enough or seriously enough or at the right times. I also don't have a 6 meter antenna. But that hasn't prevented me from confirming 44 states and 11 entities (12 when PJ4 -- which I worked yesterday -- confirms on LOTW). I've been using vertical antennas -- an 80-10 meter Outbacker and more recently a 20-10 Bravo-5 and phone, CW and FT8. So Q65 should be a good fit for me. My antennas are the definition of weak signal.

73,

Larry K8MU EN82ml

 

 




 

--

--w8lvn--


Locked Re: Low power output with 2.4.0 and IC-7300 #Cat_RigControl

Carl Licari-NX5T
 

I got it figured out. I took the Win4Icom software out of the equation and it's working fine now.
Thanks for all the input. 
73
Carl
NX5T


Locked Re: Low power output with 2.4.0 and IC-7300 #Cat_RigControl

Karza <kari.sillanmaki@...>
 

Karl,

On 1.6.2021 22.53, Karl Beckman wrote:
It sounds like you have set your computer speakers to monitor the WSJT sound card audio output, which is radio transmit audio. That is not good!  WSJT should have its own dedicated sound card device, such as the Sabrent unit found at Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/Sabrent-External-Adapter-Windows-AU-MMSC/dp/B00IRVQ0F8/ref=asc_df_B071HJ98Q6?tag=bingshoppinga-20&linkCode=df0&hvadid=80607997944720&hvnetw=o&hvqmt=e&hvbmt=be&hvdev=c&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=&hvtargid=pla-4584207577330719&th=1 .  You can also purchase them throuigh other online sources. 
The computer speakers should be set to listen only to the internal sound card 'default' speaker audio stream, which is the Windows system sounds.  Right now possible that you are transmitting both WSJT tones and the Windows alert sounds over your radio. 

the OP uses an ICOM 7300 transceiver that has an internal sound-card. 

Thus, no need for an external USB-dongle..

73's de Kari oh2gqc



Locked Re: Issue with "Enable TX" button #transmit

Jim Preston N6VH
 

On 6/1/2021 12:46 PM, Rick Wysocki wrote:
I am running Win 10 on a Samsung Flexbook. I installed the latest version of WSJT-X (2.4) and "Test CAT" and "PTT Test" both work for my IC-705. The issue is that when I hit the "Enable TX" button it flashes red briefly but will not stay red. The radio works properly when connected to WSJT-X on another laptop so I believe it's either the Flexbook Win 10 installation or the WSJT-X install on it. Any suggestions on resolving the issue would be greatly appreciated and thanks in advance. Rick, K1JOP
Rick,

In the "Generate Standard Messages" tab, do you have one of the "TX " boxes selected that is empty (see attached). If so, that, could cause the problem. Since you said it works you use a different computer, it might be something else. Doesn't hurt to check, however.

73,

Jim N6VH


Locked Re: Low power output with 2.4.0 and IC-7300 #Cat_RigControl

Dave / NR1DX <manuals@...>
 

Several folks (but not everyone) with various rigs on other reflectors have reported similar problems with the update of WSJT and a recent WIN -10 update which occurred within days of each other for some folks which reset some folks computers. Probably best to go through and check to be sure the level is set correctly in Windows as well a Radio menus

Dave
NR1DX

On 6/1/2021 4:26 PM, Philip Rose via groups.io wrote:

I doubt it’s IC-7300 specific. The IC-7300 shouldn’t direct its TX audio back to the computer. It must be something in Windows that is directing the WSJT-X audio both to the rig and the speakers, but I don’t know of a mechanism that can do that.

On second thoughts maybe the TX monitor facility feeds back into the computer audio, if you have the rig speakers feeding into the PC line-in or microphone? I don’t have TX monitor enabled on USB-D on my 7300.

73 Phil GM3ZZA

Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

*From: *Gary - AG0N <mailto:wb0kkm@...>
*Sent: *01 June 2021 19:02
*To: *main@wsjtx.groups.io <mailto:main@WSJTX.groups.io>
*Subject: *Re: [WSJTX] Low power output with 2.4.0 and IC-7300 #Cat_RigControl



On May 31, 2021, at 6:17 PM, Carl Licari-NX5T <cjlicari@...
<mailto:cjlicari@...>> wrote:

Ok, I did that and now have full output power from the radio, BUT,
I also have the transmit tone emitting from my computer speakers
that is SO loud my dogs are howling, lol. The problem is if I
lower the volume on either the speakers or the mixer the output
power drops. Any ideas how to fix this??

You are NOT configured correctly if your speakers are belting out your transmit OR receive tones.  Someone familiar with the 7300 configuration will need to help you.  You should not hear any of your transmit or receive tones, except coming out of the radio itself.

Gary - AG0N


--
73 Phil GM3ZZA

--
Dave Manuals@... www.ArtekManuals.com
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


Locked Re: #q65 Mode q65 on 6 meters #Q65

Bill Lederer
 

Sure.

Good to hear from you.

I have k3s attached to 80 meter dipole with second antenna either 20 or 160 (dipole), and my FT 1000 MP MK5 always on 40 meters to a dipole.  I have them running pretty much all the time--I can just glance over to see what is happening. So I can work stuff while working on paying projects. The 80 meter dipole works well on 80, and can work on 60, 30, 15, 10 and 6 meters.  Just ping me here, and we can  check it out. I don't check this email as often as I should, but william.lederer@... is constantly in my pocket.

73

On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 3:59 PM Larry Koziel <k8mu599mi@...> wrote:

Bill,

Let's give it a try some time. I just installed v2.4.0 a few days ago but haven't seen any signals yet. It could be because I just haven't listened long enough or seriously enough or at the right times. I also don't have a 6 meter antenna. But that hasn't prevented me from confirming 44 states and 11 entities (12 when PJ4 -- which I worked yesterday -- confirms on LOTW). I've been using vertical antennas -- an 80-10 meter Outbacker and more recently a 20-10 Bravo-5 and phone, CW and FT8. So Q65 should be a good fit for me. My antennas are the definition of weak signal.

73,

Larry K8MU EN82ml

 

 






--
--w8lvn--


Locked Re: Issue with "Enable TX" button #transmit

Bill Somerville
 

On 01/06/2021 20:46, Rick Wysocki wrote:
I am running Win 10 on a Samsung Flexbook. I installed the latest version of WSJT-X (2.4) and "Test CAT" and "PTT Test" both work for my IC-705. The issue is that when I hit the "Enable TX" button it flashes red briefly but will not stay red. The radio works properly when connected to WSJT-X on another laptop so I believe it's either the Flexbook Win 10 installation or the WSJT-X install on it. Any suggestions on resolving the issue would be greatly appreciated and thanks in advance. Rick, K1JOP
Hi Rick,

have you entered your callsign and gridsquare into "Settings->General? WSJT-X will not send a blank message, which message are you trying to send?

73
Bill
G4WJS.


Locked Re: Low power output with 2.4.0 and IC-7300 #Cat_RigControl

 

I doubt it’s IC-7300 specific. The IC-7300 shouldn’t direct its TX audio back to the computer. It must be something in Windows that is directing the WSJT-X audio both to the rig and the speakers, but I don’t know of a mechanism that can do that.

 

On second thoughts maybe the TX monitor facility feeds back into the computer audio, if you have the rig speakers feeding into the PC line-in or microphone? I don’t have TX monitor enabled on USB-D on my 7300.

 

73 Phil GM3ZZA

 

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

 

From: Gary - AG0N
Sent: 01 June 2021 19:02
To: main@wsjtx.groups.io
Subject: Re: [WSJTX] Low power output with 2.4.0 and IC-7300 #Cat_RigControl

 

 



On May 31, 2021, at 6:17 PM, Carl Licari-NX5T <cjlicari@...> wrote:

 

Ok, I did that and now have full output power from the radio, BUT, I also have the transmit tone emitting from my computer speakers that is SO loud my dogs are howling, lol. The problem is if I lower the volume on either the speakers or the mixer the output power drops. Any ideas how to fix this??

 

You are NOT configured correctly if your speakers are belting out your transmit OR receive tones.  Someone familiar with the 7300 configuration will need to help you.  You should not hear any of your transmit or receive tones, except coming out of the radio itself.

 

Gary - AG0N

 


--
73 Phil GM3ZZA


Locked Re: Low power output with 2.4.0 and IC-7300 #Cat_RigControl

Karl Beckman WA8NVW - NNV5BH
 

It sounds like you have set your computer speakers to monitor the WSJT sound card audio output, which is radio transmit audio. That is not good!  WSJT should have its own dedicated sound card device, such as the Sabrent unit found at Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/Sabrent-External-Adapter-Windows-AU-MMSC/dp/B00IRVQ0F8/ref=asc_df_B071HJ98Q6?tag=bingshoppinga-20&linkCode=df0&hvadid=80607997944720&hvnetw=o&hvqmt=e&hvbmt=be&hvdev=c&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=&hvtargid=pla-4584207577330719&th=1 .  You can also purchase them throuigh other online sources. 
The computer speakers should be set to listen only to the internal sound card 'default' speaker audio stream, which is the Windows system sounds.  Right now possible that you are transmitting both WSJT tones and the Windows alert sounds over your radio. 
--
Karl  WA8NVW  OH
WA8NVW@...
in WSJTX@groups.io


Locked Issue with "Enable TX" button #transmit

Rick Wysocki
 

I am running Win 10 on a Samsung Flexbook. I installed the latest version of WSJT-X (2.4) and "Test CAT" and "PTT Test" both work for my IC-705. The issue is that when I hit the "Enable TX" button it flashes red briefly but will not stay red. The radio works properly when connected to WSJT-X on another laptop so I believe it's either the Flexbook Win 10 installation or the WSJT-X install on it. Any suggestions on resolving the issue would be greatly appreciated and thanks in advance. Rick, K1JOP