On 16/5/20 2:04 am, Bill Somerville wrote:

On 15/05/2020 17:02, N2BRG wrote:

none of that should be necessary. So long as the previous instances of wsjtx.exe and jt9.exe have gone away then the next start of WSJT-X will allow you to delete the lock file and continue normally.

What I normally do in this situation is run "top" and then kill wsjtx-x or jst8call. No need to reboot.

--

Regards,
Phil

IMHO .. when in JT65, JT9, FT8, and FT4 ,  the only station that should send an RRR, is the CQ station, same for the RR73.   

However, the contest modes are completely different, for instance, in NA VHF Contest mode, the answering station sends the RRR after receiving an R GRID Tx from the CQ station.

The program will properly respond when the proper sequence is used.   Saving 15 seconds, or in FT4 7 seconds, causes more issues, and actually winds up taking more time to correct than to let it run properly

Neil, KN3ILZ

Why can't their program recognize response of RR73 properly after they send RRR?   Seems that is viable solution.   

73 W5AJ

On Fri, May 15, 2020, 6:52 PM <kcZEROgu@...> wrote:

I would like to piggy back on Harry's idea but how about we eliminate RRR.  The majority of hams are using RR73 but when someone sends me a RRR they expect a 73 in return yet WSJTx continues to send RR73.  I either have to manually switch to 73 or just move on.

For that matter why not make Msg2 the calling Msg and save time?  I do this manually but when running FT4 I fail to be fast enough about 25% of the time.

Just some thoughts, 73

KC0GU
Warren

I would like to piggy back on Harry's idea but how about we eliminate RRR.  The majority of hams are using RR73 but when someone sends me a RRR they expect a 73 in return yet WSJTx continues to send RR73.  I either have to manually switch to 73 or just move on.

For that matter why not make Msg2 the calling Msg and save time?  I do this manually but when running FT4 I fail to be fast enough about 25% of the time.

Just some thoughts, 73

KC0GU
Warren

Until about a year ago, I used Win10 and plain old Notepad++ (a free programmer's text editor) to create a desktop file called eqslupdate.adi . 
I would use Notepad++ to open my local wsjtx_log.adi file, highlight and copy the lines of the most recent contacts, paste them into eqslupdate.adi, and then upload this file to eQSL via login thru Firefox. Typically, I would delete the lines of contacts from the last upload before sending it, so no dupes. The ADIF is just a plain text file so Notepad++ handles it with no problems.

I did the same thing for LoTW via TQSL. It was a totally manual process, but it worked fine and the cost was zero. Nearly all Linux distros include a text editor (emacs ?) but Notepad++ is also available for Linux.
Now I have Win 10/JT Alert/AC-log setup for totally automatic upload to LoTW, but the same can be done for eQSL.

73 de Tim, WA5MD in Dallas

Dear Dave,

Thank you, I tried the --config-dir method, and had two instances of Flrig up and running, but the config files are in the same folder and there is nowhere to specify different ports for them. You reply made me realize that  i have to give full path for the "config dir" so that they be separated in different directories, and then different ports can be assigned. Worked like a charm.

Thanks again!
BU2EQ Willis

On 5/15/2020 1:33 PM, Hasan Schiers N0AN wrote:

Wow is the right word.
Earlier I saw two signals 1 Hz apart 17 dB difference. Copied the weaker signal easily. 6 meters.

The year before FT8 was released, I was working 6M JT65 double Es to the east when a JA station called me (off the back/side of my antenna. I swung around, worked him, turned back E, another JA called, worked him. A few minutes later, a W5 started calling him within 1-2 Hz of zero beat on the JA's TX cycle. WSJT-X decoded both stations perfectly for several cycles. I was pointed E, so the W5 was at least 10 dB louder.

73, Jim K9YC

Hi John,

Astu,
Check out hamspots.net also.
It can give you instant feedback on where you're signal is going.
With callsign and signal report.

Good luck 73
Fred KB4QZH

Hi Ed,
I start 2nd Instance with 3dB lower the output gain (Split None, PTT VOX, same TX cycle to 1st instance and some more) then send CQ at same time. Often both called so keep running parallel 5W1STAYSAFE and 5W1SA if the band is not congested.

73
Atsu
5W1SA/5W1STAYSAFE

Hello,
I installed WSJT-X v2.2.0-rc1 monday, on 2 pc one win10 64 bits, the other win 8.1 64 bits all works fine.
Today i got an error subprocess error " subprocess failed with exit code 2 "



On the PC win10 some times this error come back
On the PC with win 8.1 all is ok no error.
Some one have this, what s happen
Thanks for a soluce 73
Michel F1ABL

ADIF Master runs well under WINE on my Linux box. It will even associate with ADIF files in the Linux file system.

73

-Jim
NU0C


73

-Jim
NU0C

On Fri, 15 May 2020 14:47:03 +0000 (UTC)
"Robert Watson via groups.io" <wa7son@...> wrote:

Have you attempted to use WINE? I do not believe it is a VM, but it runs in LINUX. That is probsbly your best bet.
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 10:42, Bart N5BLP via groups.io<bartpearl@...> wrote: I've been using the windows version of WSJT-X for a couple of years.  To interface with eQSL, I've been using a program called ADIFMaster.  It reads the WSJT-X ADIF file directly and allows me to copy a range of QSO's (i.e.by date) to another ADIF file which I then upload to eQSL.

Given that I really don't like windows, I've been experimenting with Ubuntu Linux.  I've got WSJT-X running and have copied over the log from my windows version.  Now I need a way to export selected QSO's for upload to eQSL.  ADIFMaster only runs on windows and I do not want to have to deal with VM or other windows emulations.

So, can anyone recommend a way for me to extract and upload selected QSO's from the linux version of WSJT-X?

Thanks.

Bart N5BLP