Locked
Re: WSJT-X 2.2.0-rc1
On 14/05/2020 5:28, K7GQ@... wrote:
I am hoping that, with the Mac OS version, that the wrong screen object library was included as the Mac version looks like it's straight from Windows 3.1.Hi Harry, thanks for the issue report, we are aware of the problem with a rather clunky looking UI on macOS. This is due to a packaging error, a file is missing in the application bundle, it is fixed for the next release. 73 Bill G4WJS. |
|
Locked
Re: pskreporter
neil_zampella <neilz@...>
The reason its probably not showing up is that those callsigns
are 'non standard' and as such, do not send a GRID along when
calling CQ. Thus PSKReporter cannot properly map those
callsigns. On 5/13/2020 6:38 PM,
5w1sa.oc097@... wrote:
|
|
Locked
Re: Can't use WSJT-X 2.2.Rc1
Tom Melvin
Morning
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
What is the error message you receive? Tom -- 73 Tom GM8MJV (IO85) On 14 May 2020, at 10:11, F8RZ <f8rz@...> wrote:
Hello. |
|
Locked
Re: Managing Internal Contest Log
Roger
On 14/05/2020 00:38, Steven Rutledge wrote:
Bill, having a little trouble with this. Forgive me. I not good with software. I guess the contest log is started automatically when you go into contest mode? Is it only in Cabrillo? Reason I ask is that I would like to import the contest log into DXBASE which would require an ADI file. I think. So, I send the log off to the ARRL in Cabrillo, I'm not sure how to convert it, save it, etc. I guess it isn't supposed to show up under logs?There's two ways I deal with this. 1. I manually extract the entries I want from WSJTX's wsjtx_log.adi . 2. I rename wsjtx_log.adi so that a new file is started for the contest. Afterwards I rename the new log file and the old one back again. Then the contest log can be added to the original one. The advantage of the renaming is that you can use the colour coding to identify those who you are pouncing on. Beware if you are calling CQ as the duplicates can catch you out. Roger, G4HZA |
|
Locked
Can't use WSJT-X 2.2.Rc1
Hello.
For me, RC1 is unusable. Excellent reception and decoding. Unfortunately, On transmit, normal shift occurs (Fake it ON). BUT... When the program returns to Rx, no shift back to the reception freq, but it remains stuck on the tx freq. If I insist, an error message is displayed. (NOT a matter of RFI, power is set to zero) The settings are exactly the same as for v 2.1.2 which works flawlessly. Any ideas ? FLEX 6300 JTAlert 2.16.5- plenty of PC horsepower Thank you for reading 73 JR F8RZ |
|
Locked
pskreporter
Atsu_5W1SA
Hi All, |
|
Locked
Re: WSJTX_2-2-0-RC1 dont start ---
Haris SV1GRB
Now there is a pattern for the developers to investigate. This is how groups works, someone remarks an idea and others try changing relevant settings hi. Haris SV1GRB
|
|
Locked
Re: 2.2.0-rc1 WOW !!
Hello Joe, I noticed that 1 Hz separation decode today… On 6 Meters with two very very strong fairly local stations answering my CQ, they were both decoded – just unbelievable considering the high signal levels (>25 dB) and only 1 Hz apart.
The only issue, other than my slow computer causing missing decode sessions, is that with “Blank lines between decoding periods” checked, I very seldom get that blank line that includes the current band information.
Also, is there a way to get the country name for each line? Currently, it is displayed only on lines with CQ.
Thanks for a fantastic program.
Bill WB6JJJ/7
From: WSJTX@groups.io [mailto:WSJTX@groups.io] On Behalf Of Joe
Hi Mike, |
|
Locked
Re: WSJT-X 2.2.0-rc1
K7GQ
Joe & the WSJT Development Group
Reluctantly, I agree that it is a bit harder to click on the decoded (CQ) message of choice with the small screen movements following early decode. However, perhaps an unwelcome byproduct is that it "appears" that the loudest stations are decoded first, followed by the weaker, perhaps unintentionally giving preference to the louder stations. I am hoping that, with the Mac OS version, that the wrong screen object library was included as the Mac version looks like it's straight from Windows 3.1. Thanks for the superb product and support! Harry K7GQ |
|
Locked
Re: TS440s (Was Re: WSJT-X 2.2.0-rc1)
JP Tucson, AZ
Well Jim, I am tight on $, being poor, etc. I would love to have a 7610... it would be great to have a waterfall on a 50" monitor... then I wouldn't need to wear my glasses. Unfortunately, the tooth fairy isn't handing those out, and anyway, I haven't lost a tooth in nearly 50 years. Any of the rich folks wanna get together and offer up a donation wouldn't be turned away... 73 - John - N7GHZ On Wed, May 13, 2020, 9:02 PM Jim Brown <k9yc@...> wrote: On 5/13/2020 6:06 PM, JP Tucson, AZ wrote: |
|
Locked
Re: WSJT-X 2.2.0-rc1
va7qi
Forgot to mention that I really like the early decode feature.
73 de va7qi, ....Erik. |
|
Locked
Re: WSJT-X 2.2.0-rc1
va7qi
Upgraded to this version last night. Computer is a HP AMD-based running Win10 Home. 8GB of RAM.
Two anomalies to report: 1. If I click on TX on decoding will sometimes drag on well into the next sequence and the new sequence will then only show one or a few decodes. Perhaps some state is changed when some buttons are changed? 2. On a couple of occasions I have seen a duplicate decode of a station - on the same frequency. CPU usage as reported by another program was around 30%, which I believe includes all cores. 73 de va7qi, ....Erik. |
|
Locked
Re: TS440s (Was Re: WSJT-X 2.2.0-rc1)
Jim Brown
On 5/13/2020 6:06 PM, JP Tucson, AZ wrote:
ONLY for those who own/have access to a Kenwood TS-440S...If you're not tight on money, it's a great time to buy a new radio. The Kenwood TS590SG is a pretty decent rig for under $1400. Lots of things have been improved since the mid-'80s. I use Elecraft rigs now, and 2008-vintage rigs are selling off because newer models have been introduced. They're generally regarded as one of the better radios. 73, Jim K9YC |
|
Locked
Re: TS440s (Was Re: WSJT-X 2.2.0-rc1)
Joe Subich, W4TV
Bill,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
The goal here is to duplicate exactly the N1MM+ configuration. That configuration explicitly sets DTR and RTS high. 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 2020-05-13 9:56 PM, Bill Somerville wrote:
On 14/05/2020 02:51, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:Please set Handshake in WSJTX to *NONE* not *HARDWARE* then setHi Joe, |
|
Locked
Re: TS440s (Was Re: WSJT-X 2.2.0-rc1)
JP Tucson, AZ
Ok, just to humor some... Here are 2 more snips... Wanna guess the outcomes? No guys... REALLY, I really have tried every combination you can think of! Literally hundreds of iterations. Somewhere, I had actually used a couple of sheets of paper to keep track... just like a truth table. Here's the final outcome of those hours of work... On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 6:56 PM Bill Somerville <g4wjs@...> wrote: On 14/05/2020 02:51, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote: --
73 - John - N7GHZ |
|
Locked
Re: TS440s (Was Re: WSJT-X 2.2.0-rc1)
On 14/05/2020 02:51, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
Please set Handshake in WSJTX to *NONE* not *HARDWARE* then setHi Joe, you are correct on the handshaking option but the RTS and DTR lines do not need forcing high, that is a Red Herring as proven with the Hamlib rigctl test tool which did not need either of those lines forced high to make a good CAT connection. They are probably unconnected so their setting is irrelevant here, but best to leave them unset on the principle that with some interfaces they might be connected to PTT, CW, or FSK keying lines. They should only be forced high (or low) with the small subset of interface hardware that derives power from those lines. 73 Bill G4WJS. |
|
Locked
Re: TS440s (Was Re: WSJT-X 2.2.0-rc1)
Joe Subich, W4TV
Here ya go, they both 'look' the same... one works (N1MM), the other,They are *very different* ... as I suspected, you have WSJTX set for hardware handshake and N1MM+ set to assert RTS (RTS Always On). Please set Handshake in WSJTX to *NONE* not *HARDWARE* then set "Force Control Lines" to DTR=High and RTS=High to match N1MM+. 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 2020-05-13 8:21 PM, JP Tucson, AZ wrote: Ok Joe & Bill, |
|
Locked
Re: TS440s (Was Re: WSJT-X 2.2.0-rc1)
JP Tucson, AZ
Hello again Bill, I guess you are the night owl type... thanks... Ok, attached is what I got... fail... hmmm, looks oddly familiar... Next... On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 6:21 PM Bill Somerville <g4wjs@...> wrote: On 14/05/2020 01:21, JP Tucson, AZ wrote: --
73 - John - N7GHZ |
|
Locked
Re: Z5stayhome Logging Issue
Stan Galonski <sgalonski1@...>
Bill,
Thanks, I must have missed the notice in the group, I'll upgrade ASAP.
73,
Stan
KK3KK
In a message dated 5/13/2020 6:23:38 PM Pacific Standard Time, g4wjs@... writes:
|
|
Locked
Re: Z5stayhome Logging Issue
On 14/05/2020 01:14, Stan Galonski via
groups.io wrote:
Stan, the currently supported official general availability version of WSJT-X is v2.1.2. 73 |
|