locked
FW: [WSJTX] Settings for Yaesu FTdxx101MP
Chuck Schloss <cschloss@...>
Got it now.
73 Chuck AG0W
From: main@WSJTX.groups.io [mailto:main@WSJTX.groups.io] On Behalf Of Chuck Schloss
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2020 1:21 PM To: main@WSJTX.groups.io Subject: [WSJTX] Settings for Yaesu FTdxx101MP
Does anyone have the radio settings page info for this rig. Am using CAT control cable from radio to USB port Com 4 of Windows 10 laptop. Had been using FTDX5000 as radio setting with 9600 baud rate, worked OK, but gave “Hamlib” error if I tried 80m FT8. So I’m happy to see FTDX101D now in Hamlib.
Thanks everyone,
Chuck AG0W
|
|
locked
Re: Tnx for the FT991 fix but ...
neil_zampella <neilz@...>
There is no workaround. The system used to create WSJT-X has
dropped all XP and VISTA support. On 6/6/2020 3:57 PM, John Kirby wrote:
... still so sad and disappointed
|
|
locked
Tnx for the FT991 fix but ...
John Kirby
... still so sad and disappointed
Is there any work around to make 2.2.x run on XP ? John N3AAZ
|
|
locked
Re: New feature option for non-CQ New Call color highlighting
May I also agree.... I use a pad or my phone for most of my QSOs. I don't have the luxury of looking up a DX call to see if he is already in the log. Maybe I am missing a tool ( knowledge ) that would help, but until I sort that out, I am all in favor of color coding everything Thanks W4PID@...
|
|
locked
Re: 20M congestion
Bob McGraw - K4TAX <rmcgraw@...>
I find that 14.071 along with 14.074 is in the frequency table for FT-8. That gives almost 6 kHz useable bandwidth. Yes, 14.074 is quite busy. So guess we have to spread out a bit.
73 Bob, K4TAX
|
|
locked
Re: 20M congestion
Tony Collett
Just a suggestion, why not try other modes or even other bands?
Not suggesting legacy modes like SSB or CW (but when the sunspots return why not talk to people instead). I actually mean try FT4. Often those frequencies are fairly quiet and you won't need the amplifier to burn a hole in the waterfall just to make yourself heard above all the QRM. I am more than impressed by how well FT4 mode works. The extra sensitivity of FT8 is unachievable when all the waterfall is full. Claiming more frequencies just for more FT8 really needs organised band planning as few of us are aware of everything that is being used outside our own little island. 73 Tony G4NBS
|
|
locked
Re: 20M congestion
Dave (NK7Z)
I see those were removed... Never mind! :)
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
73, and thanks, Dave (NK7Z) https://www.nk7z.net ARRL Volunteer Examiner ARRL Technical Specialist ARRL Asst. Director, NW Division, Technical Resources
On 6/6/20 9:55 AM, Dave Cole wrote:
I believe there are frequencies now built into WSJT-X as backup for when they standards are full.
|
|
locked
Re: ALL.TXT
Sam Birnbaum
Hi Bobby,
FYI, I was able to create a on groups IO.
There is a newer version of Alltext,.exe with some additional features there.
There is a mode filter and the ability to do SNR analysis within date ranges as well. Its a simple subscribe.
Here is the link: https://groups.io/g/ProgramsByW2JDB
73,
Sam W2JDB
-----Original Message-----
From: Bobby Chandler <bobbye@...> To: main@WSJTX.groups.io Sent: Sat, Jun 6, 2020 3:36 pm Subject: Re: [WSJTX] ALL.TXT Sam, got the attachment here and both files fine with 7zip.
Bobby/N4AU
--
Bobby Chandler
|
|
locked
Re: ALL.TXT
Bobby Chandler
Sam, got the attachment here and both files fine with 7zip.
Bobby/N4AU -- Bobby Chandler bobbye@... n4au@...
|
|
locked
Re: WSJT-X 2.2.1 GA Release
Gerald Klotz
Joe and the group, did I understand correctly that you removed the added frequencies for now until it can be coordinated?
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
If so, we will still have the added frequencies until we refresh them correct? I have seen a lot of activity on the added frequencies on 20 meters since 2.2.0 Gerry Klotz
On Jun 6, 2020, at 12:44 PM, Joe <joe@...> wrote:
|
|
locked
Re: Dependency?
Mike Marko <mike.marko.em@...>
Thanks, Bill!
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I can wait; it's just that I was surprised that 2.1.2 worked before with Ubuntu 20.04 -- but it no longer does. -- Mike
On 6/6/2020 2:18 PM, Bill Somerville wrote:
On 06/06/2020 19:14, Mike Marko wrote:Trying to install 2,2.0 (or even 2.1.2) on Ubuntu 20.04.Hi Mike,
|
|
locked
Re: Dependency?
On 06/06/2020 19:14, Mike Marko wrote:
Trying to install 2,2.0 (or even 2.1.2) on Ubuntu 20.04.Hi Mike, the package we provide at release time only targets a handful of commonly used Linux distributions, in this case Ubuntu 18.04 LTS. Until Ubuntu 20.04.1 is released, which is accompanied by a route to upgrade from earlier versions, we will stick with the previous LTS release. If you can wait a while or hard working package maintainers will have done their work and v2.2.1 packages will be rolled out across the distributions they support. If you can't wait then I suggest you build from sources, it's not hard, and doesn't take long. Instructions in the INSTALL file within the v2.2.1 sources tarball. 73 Bill G4WJS.
|
|
locked
Dependency?
Mike Marko <mike.marko.em@...>
Trying to install 2,2.0 (or even 2.1.2) on Ubuntu 20.04. I had 2.1.2 working, but after trying to install 2.2.0, I can't get it again: arko@K2NU:~/Desktop$ gdebi wsjtx_2.2.0_amd64.deb Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Reading state information... Done This package is uninstallable Dependency is not satisfiable: libgfortran3 (>= 4.8.2) marko@K2NU:~/Desktop$ gdebi wsjtx_2.1.2_amd64.deb Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Reading state information... Done This package is uninstallable Dependency is not satisfiable: libgfortran3 (>= 4.8.2) I searched for any files *wsjtx* and found none. TNX, K2NU
|
|
locked
Re: TX6 Message in NA Contest Mode V2.2.0
Tony Collett
Thanks again Bill/Reino
Absolutely agree that the situation SHOULDN'T arise Bill and that it would be good if a common format was agreed and used. Having said that I have seen stations on HF that are in EU contest mode, and as you acknowledge some VHF contests use NA.... so it will happen. I don't see the answer in the user manual Reino, just examples of ideal QSO exchanges, not what happens if the two should collide. Which format (if any) will try to make the other change I wonder? I guess I will wait to get the aerials back in the air for a test to see what happens!! Like you I force the RR73 message and if necessary also follow it with 73 to try and end the loop, BTW often the QSO will not log under those circumstances unless you also place the required Locator (NA mode) in the Exch Rcvd box if it wasn't sent as part of the exchange. Cheers Tony
|
|
locked
Re: WSJT-X 2.2.1 GA Release
Chris G4KVI
Absolutely brilliant!! Well done everyone, all working with FT991. Thank you.
|
|
locked
Re: New feature option for non-CQ New Call color highlighting
K8BL BOB LIDDY <k8bl@...>
I wouldn't want (or need) WSJTX to have to search through all 24K+ FT8/4 QSOs in my Log just to let me know if I had already worked someone every time it does a decode. IMHO, that is definite overkill! Doing it on a Station's CQ is fully enough. 73, Bob K8BL
On Saturday, June 6, 2020, 01:20:39 PM EDT, Bob Lewis <aa4pb@...> wrote:
I wonder how much that would impact the performance of WSJT-x given that it would require many more call sign lookups in the log file than just doing it for the stations calling CQ.
From: main@WSJTX.groups.io [mailto:main@WSJTX.groups.io] On Behalf Of Geoffrey Mendenhall
Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2020 12:53 PM To: main@WSJTX.groups.io Subject: Re: [WSJTX] New feature option for non-CQ New Call color highlighting
I agree with Duane that this would be an important enhancement to WSJT-x. I use the color highlighting to most importantly determine if I have already worked the station just completing a QSO without having to wait for the station to clear all other stations calling and to call CQ again. I also use the feature to check to see if the station is an LoTW user. All of the color coding options should be available for activity in progress.
|
|
locked
WSJT-X 2.2.1 GA Release
WSJT-X 2.2.1 is a bug-fix release that addresses several regressions or defects in version 2.2.0.
Most importantly, v2.2.1 incorporates a revised Hamlib version that properly controls the Yaesu FT-891 and FT-991 radios. A list of all program changes since WSJT-X 2.2.0 can be found in the cumulative Release Notes here: http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/k1jt/Release_Notes.txt Upgrading from earlier versions of WSJT-X should be seamless. There is no need to uninstall a previous version or move any files. Links to installation packages for Windows, Linux, and Macintosh are available here: http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/k1jt/wsjtx.html You can also download the packages from our SourceForge site: https://sourceforge.net/projects/wsjt/files/ It may take a short time for the SourceForge site to be updated. WSJT-X is licensed under the terms of Version 3 of the GNU General Public License (GPL). Development of this software is a cooperative project to which many amateur radio operators have contributed. If you use our code, please have the courtesy to let us know about it. If you find bugs or make improvements to the code, please report them to us in a timely fashion. Follow instructions in the WSJT-X User Guide here: http://www.physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/wsjtx-doc/wsjtx-main-2.2.0.html#SUPPORT We hope you will enjoy using WSJT-X Version 2.2.1. -- 73 from Joe, K1JT, Steve, K9AN, and Bill, G4WJS, for the entire WSJT Development Group
|
|
locked
Re: 20M congestion
a c <jerseyj2@...>
Ayes it does Joe and thank you for listening.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Jerry KB2GCG - "Defeat lasts one day, giving up lasts a lifetime."
On Jun 6, 2020, at 12:25 PM, Joe <joe@...> wrote:
|
|
locked
Re: New feature option for non-CQ New Call color highlighting
Bob Lewis
I wonder how much that would impact the performance of WSJT-x given that it would require many more call sign lookups in the log file than just doing it for the stations calling CQ.
From: main@WSJTX.groups.io [mailto:main@WSJTX.groups.io] On Behalf Of Geoffrey Mendenhall
I agree with Duane that this would be an important enhancement to WSJT-x. I use the color highlighting to most importantly determine if I have already worked the station just completing a QSO without having to wait for the station to clear all other stations calling and to call CQ again. I also use the feature to check to see if the station is an LoTW user. All of the color coding options should be available for activity in progress.
|
|
Neil Curtis <neiljcurtis@...>
Hi all, When using my windows 10 box WSJTX switches between VFOa and VFOb without any problems. It is only when running the Linux version of WSJTX that the problem occurs. It switches to the alternative VFO to TX and then fails when switching back to the Rx VFO. Just tried with split mode set to none and still get the failure when switching from TX back to RX, same with Fake It. 73 Neil 2E0CMN
On Sat, 6 Jun 2020, 17:45 Gary Abercrombie, <gabercr@...> wrote:
|
|