Locked
Re: Help with FIL1 bandwidth/FT8 question
Bruce N7XGR
Anthony, You did not see my posting about this, it appeared just 2 days ago on the 7100 group.
It appears that your RX bandwidth setting needs to be wider on USB-D mode. It is easy to change the RX bandwidth in USB-D mode, it is the same for regular USB mode. IN USB-D mode press and hold the FLI on screen button at the top. Tap the BW button, now rotate the VFO knob to the right (CW) to increase the bandwidth, when done tap the BW button to save this new setting. You can do this to all 3 USB-D filters. In regular USB mode this can be done also, the bandwidth settings are separate per mode setting. 3 for USB, 3 for USB-D and so on. When all is finished goto the SD card menu and save these new bandwidth settings. When you set WSJT-X in Data/Ptk it sends the CIV command to the 7100 for USB-D mode. This setting cuts off the mic audio during transmit, otherwise the mic would be hot and picking up your barking dog or the howling from the Wolfman movie you are watching. Bruce N7XGR On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 8:38 AM Bill Somerville <g4wjs@...> wrote: On 26/06/2020 13:29, Anthony DeWitt wrote: |
|
Locked
Re: Help with FIL1 bandwidth/FT8 question
Hi Anthony,
I don't have an IC-7100 so take this
with a pinch of salt. Try selecting USB-D mode, pressing the
FILTER button for 1 second, then press it again until FIL1 is
selected, then press the button under the BW display indication,
then adjust the filter width using the main VFO dial.
73
Bill G4WJS. On 26/06/2020 13:52, Anthony DeWitt
wrote:
Thanks Bill. I must be stupid because I keep trying to follow the directions in the manual and can’t get the filter to adjust. I guess I just need to keep playing with it. Definitely operator error. I saw the same thing in the manual, but could not get it to work operationally. It’s gotta be something I am doing wrong. AD0DQOn Jun 26, 2020, at 7:37 AM, Bill Somerville <g4wjs@...> wrote: On 26/06/2020 13:29, Anthony DeWitt wrote:I want to use my 7100 on Field Day for FT8. It’s actually the perfect radio for FD because it has all bands. I have used it for PSK and never noticed a significant issue with bandwidth. In prepping, I found I could not expand the FIL1 bandwidth past 1.4k on USD-D. Does anyone know if there is a workaround or a fix? I can get 3K on my 7300 but don’t want to take it to the field. I noticed on the FT8 bandwidth that the bright yellow ends that reflect the available bandwidth show my viewable bandwidth to be greatly truncated. Help? Cross-posted to WSJT-X group too.Hi Anthony, looking at the IC-7100 manual, it does seem that 1200 Hz is the default IF filter width in SSB-D modes for FILTER1, but it also says it is adjustable to a maximum 50Hz - 3600 Hz width. Try selecting USB-D mod, pressing the FILTER button for 1 second, then adjust the filter width. 73 Bill G4WJS.
|
|
Locked
Re: Field Day Digital Frequencies
Williams, G (af8c) <af8c@...>
RE: Moving up
I would try steps of 3 to 5 kHz per the WSJT-X description: "WSJT-X provides spectral displays for receiver passbands as wide as 5 kHz" although I have not tried that myself. -73, Glenn, AF8C On 6/26/2020 9:16 AM, Kermit Lehman via
groups.io wrote:
|
|
Locked
Re: Field Day Digital Frequencies
There are no required frequencies for FT8, at least not specified by ARRL.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
There is a group who has frequency suggestions on 20m and 40m only for this year so that those bands can have some space away from Field Day traffic for regular DXing, particularly for stations outside of the United States and Canada. On 20 meters, suggested frequency is 14090, 40 meters 7056, 6 meters 50330. These are suggestions and you may find more than a few people there. I'm sure there will also be people working the regular band segments. Ria N2RJ On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 00:01, Tim <t.m.kelly@...> wrote:
|
|
Locked
Re: Field Day Digital Frequencies
Kermit Lehman
I should have specified in my previous email about FT Field Day frequencies that I was referring to the FT8 bands only, not the FT4 ones, in the following statement. It would be better stated as:
Use the standard FT sub-bands. If the FT8 bands get too crowded or if you don't want to QRM non-FD ops there's nothing to stop you from moving up above the normal FT8 sub-bands. These higher frequencies are claimed by WSJT-X for other, largely unused modes (JT65, JT9) but apparently aren't to be used for FT. I have not seen an explanation why. 73,
Ken, AB1J -----Original Message-----
From: Kermit Lehman via groups.io <ktfrog007@...> To: main@WSJTX.groups.io <main@WSJTX.groups.io> Sent: Fri, Jun 26, 2020 1:16 pm Subject: Re: [WSJTX] Field Day Digital Frequencies Re: Field Day frequencies for FT4 and FT8 (see much discussion down below)
Use the standard FT sub-bands. If they get too crowded or if you don't want to QRM non-FD ops there's nothing to stop you from moving up above the normal FT sub-bands. These higher frequencies are claimed by WSJT-X for other, largely unused modes but apparently aren't to be used for FT. I have not seen an explanation why.
|
|
Locked
Re: WSJT to N1MM Logging.
Richard Lawn
I got some help and while it’s not working as it should there was a backwards workaround - give Radio CAT control back to WSJT-X and have it broadcast for logging purposes to N1MM+. The WSJT call window from within N1MM also and you can select a call to work from that as well. I should be good to go...fingers crossed.
-- Rick, W2JAZ |
|
Locked
Re: Field Day Digital Frequencies
Kermit Lehman
Re: Field Day frequencies for FT4 and FT8 (see much discussion down below)
Use the standard FT sub-bands. If they get too crowded or if you don't want to QRM non-FD ops there's nothing to stop you from moving up above the normal FT sub-bands. These higher frequencies are claimed by WSJT-X for other, largely unused modes but apparently aren't to be used for FT. I have not seen an explanation why.
The WSJT-X standard suggestion is to move up in two kHz steps in contests when bands get crowded (WWDigi rules):
Set the radio dial at the bottom of the sub-band and work stations on audio frequencies within the radio passband typically 2.5-4 kHz wide. If a sub-band becomes crowded, move the radio dial frequency up in 2 kHz increments, as needed.
Of course, they are talking about moving up from separate contest sub-bands, but there's no reason it can't be done with the normal sub-bands. Same principle.
Set your dial frequency up 2 kHz and you will overlap with the top 1 kHz of the existing sub-bands (already a less used portion). Or you could go up 3 kHz for complete separation but still be adjacent.
It seems unreasonable to expect FT people to tune around looking for random operation away from the normal frequencies. FT is a very compact mode in terms of frequency use. It should easy to find contest sub-bands, but the best ones are right next door to the existing ones.
73,
Ken, AB1J
-----Original Message-----
From: neil_zampella <neilz@...> To: main@WSJTX.groups.io Sent: Fri, Jun 26, 2020 9:03 am Subject: Re: [WSJTX] Field Day Digital Frequencies "Word of Mouth" is wrong ... there are no specified frequencies
for Field Day. Just use the standard frequencies and answer
people calling CQ FD.
Neil, KN3ILZ On 6/26/2020 12:01 AM, Tim wrote: I was told by word of
mouth that only certain frequencies can be used for digital
contacts (FT4/8, PSK31 and others) on Field Day.
I can not find anything as
such. Am I not finding the correct ruling for digital progam
contact?
Thank you and good luck to all this weekend.
Tim - N8NEU
DMR ID 3158619 FN00ah From: K8BL BOB LIDDY <k8bl@...> To: main@wsjtx.groups.io Sent: Tue, Jun 23, 2020 5:40 pm Subject: Re: [WSJTX] Field Day frequencies for FT4 and FT8? Maybe the mostly dead spaces at 7100-7125, 14100-14150, 21100-21200
and 28100-28200 could be used for those 27 hours. Temporarily pick a
freq or two in those areas. This is mostly a Domestic event at lower power
having little effect or interest outside US/Canada. Just a suggestion.
de Bob K8BL
On Tuesday, June 23, 2020, 01:07:56 PM EDT, Hasan Schiers N0AN <hbasri.schiers6@...> wrote:
Because it's inconsiderate of the non FT-8 etc. operators. We have our own segment, live with it, for 27 hours and let the other freq's alone. Moving off is understandable for a DXpedition which goes on for days and involves on station (on the far end).
Taking an entire contest community off our segment and splashing all over another segment is simply selfish.
Hasan
|
|
Locked
Re: Help with FIL1 bandwidth/FT8 question
AD0DQ Tony
Thanks Bill. I must be stupid because I keep trying to follow the directions in the manual and can’t get the filter to adjust. I guess I just need to keep playing with it. Definitely operator error. I saw the same thing in the manual, but could not get it to work operationally. It’s gotta be something I am doing wrong.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
AD0DQ On Jun 26, 2020, at 7:37 AM, Bill Somerville <g4wjs@...> wrote: |
|
Locked
Re: Help with FIL1 bandwidth/FT8 question
On 26/06/2020 13:29, Anthony DeWitt wrote:
I want to use my 7100 on Field Day for FT8. It’s actually the perfect radio for FD because it has all bands. I have used it for PSK and never noticed a significant issue with bandwidth.Hi Anthony, looking at the IC-7100 manual, it does seem that 1200 Hz is the default IF filter width in SSB-D modes for FILTER1, but it also says it is adjustable to a maximum 50Hz - 3600 Hz width. Try selecting USB-D mode, pressing the FILTER button for 1 second, then adjust the filter width. 73 Bill G4WJS. |
|
Locked
Help with FIL1 bandwidth/FT8 question
AD0DQ Tony
I want to use my 7100 on Field Day for FT8. It’s actually the perfect radio for FD because it has all bands. I have used it for PSK and never noticed a significant issue with bandwidth.
In prepping, I found I could not expand the FIL1 bandwidth past 1.4k on USD-D. Does anyone know if there is a workaround or a fix? I can get 3K on my 7300 but don’t want to take it to the field. I noticed on the FT8 bandwidth that the bright yellow ends that reflect the available bandwidth show my viewable bandwidth to be greatly truncated. Help? Cross-posted to WSJT-X group too. |
|
Locked
Re: WSJT-X 2.2.0-rc2
On 26/06/2020 04:02, edgudman@... wrote:
Bill - I see the same thing with my IC-7610 while running 2.2.0. If WSJT-X is running and I turn the radio off using the power switch on the radio it will come back on after a couple minutes. I have to close the software prior to turning the radio off. Since I cover my rigs when not in use this can be a problem if one is not careful. Don't want the radio running while under the cover.Hi Ed, please ask the Hamlib team to make this "feature" optional. I have asked the author but so far no response. https://sourceforge.net/projects/hamlib/lists/hamlib-developer 73 Bill G4WJS. |
|
Locked
Re: chrome anti virus blocking 2-2-2
Darl DEEDS
Wrong email. Sorry
From: Darl DEEDS
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2020 07:36 To: main@WSJTX.groups.io Subject: Re: [WSJTX] chrome anti virus blocking 2-2-2
Never go by word of mouth! Read the rules and obey. Then get on the radio and listen to where the CQ’s are at for the test or Field Day. Too many people are demanding certain frequencies for Field Day this year. There are none. Within your license class is all. Make some contacts and be happy!
73 Darl NA8W
From: Robert Watson via groups.io
Thats interesting. I am currently having the same issue, Chrome is up to date, with the exact version that you upgraded to.
Now what? I have tried everything, except giving up.
WA7SON
On Thursday, June 25, 2020, 03:27:44 PM EDT, jim crisco via groups.io <jcrisco@...> wrote:
fyi
my chrome ( level 83.0.4103.106 ) blocked the download of wsjtx 2-2-2 install file ..64 bit.. i am using avg for anti virus...turned it off...same..
tried edge... my edge ( level 83.0.478.56 ) allowed me to download the install file...
checked for updates for chrome... there was one...installed... new level is 83.0.4103.116 now chrome allows me to download the 2-2-2 install file ok...
73 jim wa4yiz
|
|
Locked
Re: chrome anti virus blocking 2-2-2
Darl DEEDS
Never go by word of mouth! Read the rules and obey. Then get on the radio and listen to where the CQ’s are at for the test or Field Day. Too many people are demanding certain frequencies for Field Day this year. There are none. Within your license class is all. Make some contacts and be happy!
73 Darl NA8W
From: Robert Watson via groups.io
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2020 23:45 To: main@WSJTX.groups.io Subject: Re: [WSJTX] chrome anti virus blocking 2-2-2
Thats interesting. I am currently having the same issue, Chrome is up to date, with the exact version that you upgraded to.
Now what? I have tried everything, except giving up.
WA7SON
On Thursday, June 25, 2020, 03:27:44 PM EDT, jim crisco via groups.io <jcrisco@...> wrote:
fyi
my chrome ( level 83.0.4103.106 ) blocked the download of wsjtx 2-2-2 install file ..64 bit.. i am using avg for anti virus...turned it off...same..
tried edge... my edge ( level 83.0.478.56 ) allowed me to download the install file...
checked for updates for chrome... there was one...installed... new level is 83.0.4103.116 now chrome allows me to download the 2-2-2 install file ok...
73 jim wa4yiz
|
|
Locked
Re: CAT/rig not working for ft897 after Release 2.1.2
On 26/06/2020 07:04, Guybrush Threepwood wrote:
Dear Users,Hi Guybrush (cool name!), this is a known issue, please select the FT-857 rig model which will work correctly. 73 Bill G4WJS. |
|
Locked
CAT/rig not working for ft897 after Release 2.1.2
Guybrush Threepwood
Dear Users,
Recently I upgraded my installation Debian Buster from 2.0.0 to 2.2.2 and I saw that the Hamlib Rig/CAT throws an errorr about geting the VFO. After some investigation I managed to narrow down this to the changes from: last working version: 2.1.2 first non working version 2.2.1 I guess this is due to the change on hamlib 4.0 I have the same issue installing on both methods either using the .deb file and compile from scratch. I do not know how should I report this bug. I have seen some post about this without answer. is there any place to fill a bug report and do the following of it? is there any way I can help to fix this? I have very little knowledge on C but I have the radio so I can do some testing if instructed. can someone clarify if this si ssomething we should manage from wsjtx side or from hamlib side? I do not know where the bug exatly is. Thanks guybrush Threepwood. |
|
Locked
Re: #bug #macos #hamlib #wsjtx #thank
#IssueReport
Hi Miloš,
are you still having issues with your
rig using the FT-857 model on v2.2.2 of WSJT-X?
73
Bill G4WJS. On 26/06/2020 04:01, Miloš Soukup
wrote:
Hello Bill,
|
|
Locked
Re: Field Day Digital Frequencies
neil_zampella <neilz@...>
"Word of Mouth" is wrong ... there are no specified frequencies
for Field Day. Just use the standard frequencies and answer
people calling CQ FD.
|
|
Locked
Re: ARRL Field Day Contest Logging Messages
Reino Talarmo
Next try to put a call into the box under DX Call field and in Tab 1 Generate Std Msgs. If still not proper messages, then I may give up. You said that you'll get only standard messages, I assume.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
73, Reino OH3mA -----Original Message-----
From: main@WSJTX.groups.io [mailto:main@WSJTX.groups.io] On Behalf Of Dave - K7DCJ via groups.io Sent: 26. kesäkuuta 2020 7:27 To: main@wsjtx.groups.io Subject: Re: [WSJTX] ARRL Field Day Contest Logging Messages I click OK. I have red Field Day on main window. 73, Dave K7DCJ On Jun 25, 2020, at 8:28 PM, Reino Talarmo <reino.talarmo@...> wrote: |
|
Locked
Re: Uh OH! Serious bug for Field Day!
K7RA Tad Cook
I agree, it is a contest, although a fairly informal one. Just as serious contesters always give a signal report of 5NN, you won't hear them ever ask for a repeat of the other station's section. Of course, in Field Day the exchange does not include any signal report, only ARRL section and operating class. I've always thought it funny that the various logging programs record the time of each contact and the other stations class, but I guess if they didn't they might get complaints. But maybe I am wrong, not having ever used a logging program. For Field Day, I just make a list or spreadsheet for each band/mode and use it to record calls and check for dupes. On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 6:17 PM Jim Shorney <jshorney@...> wrote:
--
|
|
Locked
Re: #bug #macos #hamlib #wsjtx #thank
#IssueReport
Miloš Soukup
Hello Bill,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Thank you for your info. Pls, which is the last version not affected by it? 2.2.0? thx & 73 de Miloš, OK1FMY On 25/06/2020 17:11, Miloš Soukup wrote: |
|