|
locked
First item on the menu !
DAVID <wd4kpd@...>
i feel we must try and stake out a small section of the ether for our ops. the section must be as far as possible be good in all regions.
will start a poll soon after we get more members. david/wd4kpd
|
|
|
|
locked
New poll for WSJTX
WSJTX@...
Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the
WSJTX group: just to make it easy, poll will be by band with usb dial as center. what is good freq for 160m. keep in mind the itu regions restrictions in mind so everyone can be included. david/wd4kpd o 1837.5 o 1838 o 1838.5 o 1839 o 1839.5 o less than 1837.5 or above 1839.5 To vote, please visit the following web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WSJTX/surveys?id=13159241 Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo! Groups web site listed above. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
locked
JT9x
Russell Blair <russell_blair86@...>
Nice to see the group get started. Russell NC5O " IN GOD WE TRUST " " Skype-Russell.Blair "
|
|
|
|
locked
OPERATIONS 160M 2NITE
David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD <wd4kpd@...>
2330Z
cq on 1839 @ 1300hz audio....if qrm gets bad will move higher. david/wd4kpd up to 500w and hygain 18ht vert -- God's law is set in stone..everything else is negotiable.
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: OPERATIONS 160M 2NITE
w4lde
David,
Thanks for my 1st JT9-1 on 160M and only my 2nd QSO on the mode. Fun 73 de Ron W4LDE On 11/8/2012 6:21 PM, David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD wrote:
|
|
|
|
locked
friday eve.
David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD <wd4kpd@...>
2300z
on tonight with jt9-1 1839.5 @ 1300hz audio -- God's law is set in stone..everything else is negotiable.
|
|
|
|
locked
Pole...
ve9dx <ve9dx@...>
Just on JT9-1 a short time but in 2 nights of listening much above 1838 plus 1500 hz is useless here. Due to a local noise.
About a half dozen in the log so far on 160 between 1838 plus 1400 and 1600 hz. Also ran a few Europeans on 10.130 around noon time in the plus 1400 to 1500 hz area. Haven't found JT9-1 on any other bands yet so will look forward to hearing what is being used where on the other bands. K1CF just asked me to try JT9-2 - works - talk about long and drawn out though. Sloooooooooow Will be around 1838 plus 1500 most of the evening... 73 Andy (VE9DX)
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: Pole...
John - kc2rxs
Hi Andy,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
After you use JT9-2 for a QSO, JT9-1 seems fast. There is some activity on 14.078, I made a few contacts there. 73, John - kc2rxs On 11/9/2012 7:45 PM, ve9dx wrote:
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: Pole...
ve9dx@...
John - Nice working you. Yes JT9-2 is Sloooow...! I will check out 14.078 next week. WAE RTTY this weekend so that part of the band will bee useless I am sure,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Likely do some more 30 tomorrow. Found noon yesterday good to Europe... Have some issues with the program... Once rebooting all well again but had to do it several times during the afternoon. Again many thanks for calling... 73 Andy ---- John - kc2rxs <johnd@...> wrote:
Hi Andy,
|
|
|
|
locked
30m Band Utilization Chart update: 10 November 2012
Ian Wade G3NRW <g3nrw-radio@...>
30m Band Utilization Chart update: 10 November 2012
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/wadei/30m_band_utilization.htm -- 73 Ian, G3NRW The 30m Band Utilization Chart: http://homepage.ntlworld.com/wadei/30m_band_utilization.htm
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: Pole...
KD7YZ Bob <kd7yz@...>
On 09-Nov-12 ve9dx sent, on a straight key:
Just on JT9-1 a short time but in 2 nights of listening much aboveHi ndy. I would guess that the limited number of us initially on JT9 are struggling to find openings in the segments of each general JT65 area. You local noise, is it far wider than +/- 1838 +1500Hz? It is break-of-day here in KY and I am 1839.5 +1300 calling CQ. on 1838 I am hammered by the JT65 guys operating essentially 1839 too. But with the USB dial set to 1839.5 and then my offset of 1300, I can hear one CQ'er but the tones arquite a bit Low and thus not really in the perceived passband and not all over the screen, so to speak. Were I lower, 1838, it would be left-to-right jt65 splatter. K1CF just asked me to try JT9-2 - works - talk about long and drawn out though.yup. I tried it too. I am trying to work out the logic. yeah I would be able to hear/collect/integrate and double my chances of a decode. The flipside is that to transmit a solid 2 minutes I'd Quarter my ft950 output. Here's one for all discussion. I was just calling CQ on offset +1300 and Tx=QSO Freq. N1HOQ did what I do a lot of the time, called me but at Offset +1500. I double-click and set TX=QSO .. So I am actually now on his offset .. he then does not respond in the next sequence. I do that all to many times. It's like i expect the program to automatically put me on caller's offset. Guess I'll eventually remember to do it. -- Bob KD7YZ
|
|
|
|
locked
What's a good place on 160m?
KD7YZ Bob <kd7yz@...>
I have been calling CQ on 1839.5 +1300 for a few nights. I get hammered
and hammered by JT65 which comes up there and directly on my signal. KB3X has done this lasting as long as 45 minutes. Is there a better place we can congregate? I find it unhelpful to need to logon to one of many Internet Forums to then announce I call CQ. Anyway, one would have to do this on many sites to be moderately effective. It defeats the purpose of "Radio" anyway. Rather get used to a singe On-The-Air frequency to see if anyone i on. However, not one that I get hammered on by a wider and different mode. -- Bob KD7YZ EM88
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: What's a good place on 160m?
Bob Myers <w1xt@...>
Bob, I listened last night on 1838 and 1835.5 most the evening and never heard any JT9. I'll check 1839.5 after a while tonight here in the West. See if I can hear anyone. Is anyone on 80M? Where? On 40M? Thanks for the 30M Q earlier today. 73 Bob W1XT Surprise, AZ
On Nov 11, 2012, at 8:29 PM, KD7YZ Bob <kd7yz@...> wrote: I have been calling CQ on 1839.5 +1300 for a few nights. I get hammered
|
|
|
|
locked
160m skeds
David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD <wd4kpd@...>
hello down under...
i would be most happy to do some wsjtx on 160m. most any time welcome.... david/wd4kpd -- God's law is set in stone..everything else is negotiable.
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: 160m skeds
kj4qdz <nervous@...>
I am on 1.3895 now. I'll be there for a while if you can make it.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Tom KJ4QDZ
--- In WSJTX@..., David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD <wd4kpd@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: 160m skeds
Bob Myers <w1xt@...>
On Nov 12, 2012, at 7:41 PM, "kj4qdz" <nervous@...> wrote: I am on 1.3895 now. I'll be there for a while if you can make it. Assume 1839.5 kHz dial freq. I'll be around after about 0400Z. Thanks. --W1XT
|
|
|
|
locked
New in the group
sp1jpq <jerry@...>
Hi all.
I regularly use JT65 on HF and VHF. Of course, I turned immediately in testing new Digimode JT9. Unfortunately I do not have an antenna for 160 meters, so try to do the 3.5, 7, 10 MHz. Two days ago, make first DX SQO on 10.130 with VE9DX. IMHO WSJTX software is very promising, but it still contains a lot of errors and requires a lot of work. Best regards, 73 Jerry SP1JPQ & SO1D (contest call)
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: Pole...
g3zxx
Hi Andy,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
At least we finally made it on 30m. There is still just a few of us, so I'm sure that activity will improve in time, as Joe gets the software really singing, and more individuals have a go. Cheers & 73's Dave, G3ZXX.
--- In WSJTX@..., "ve9dx" <ve9dx@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: 30m Band Utilization Chart update: 10 November 2012
g3zxx
Hi Ian, G3NRW.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
This is probably one of the most useful documents produced by anyone, including national societies, etc., Thanks for all your efforts in producing and maintaining the document. Cheers & 73's Dave, G3ZXX.
--- In WSJTX@..., Ian Wade G3NRW <g3nrw-radio@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
locked
160m poll
DAVID <wd4kpd@...>
the 160m qrg poll is coming along ala-bit slowly.
so far 1839 & 1839.5 are most popular. i suspect this is because of the qrm from jt65. will be closing poll by the holiday, so please vote. the outcome is of course not binding in any way, but if you wish less qrm, the popular choice would seem to the best. as an aside, the qrg on 30m seems to have defaulted to 10.130 all by itself. i will not be holdiing a 30m poll. please vote on 160m soonest. david/wd4kpd
|
|
|