|
locked
Re: F/H mode malfunction or operator error?
#FoxAndHound
Also, you say that J28PJ was using F/H mode on 17m - if your QSO was on the standard frequency of 18100kHz then it's almost certain that J28PJ was using the MSHV multi-stream variant of WSJT-X and not
Also, you say that J28PJ was using F/H mode on 17m - if your QSO was on the standard frequency of 18100kHz then it's almost certain that J28PJ was using the MSHV multi-stream variant of WSJT-X and not
|
By
John, K9MM
·
#21369
·
|
|
locked
#NewUser Duplicates
#NewUser
How do I see if a potential contact has already been worked?
How do I see if a potential contact has already been worked?
|
By
nelson w
·
#21368
·
|
|
locked
Re: Band hopping in other modes
#Cat_RigControl
#FT8
#Timesync
Band hopping in WSPR. A known bug in 2.2.2
--
Don
W6CZ/W6ZB
DM07bk
Band hopping in WSPR. A known bug in 2.2.2
--
Don
W6CZ/W6ZB
DM07bk
|
By
Don Melcher
·
#21367
·
|
|
locked
Re: Delayed display of rcv'd decodes...
#FT8
Hi Chuck,
According to my cpu & gpu monitors, the cpu has never hit 100% under normal conditions with wsjtx; most @ around 55-68%. Even with 40-46 decodes per pass.
Duo core w/8Gb RAM helps with
Hi Chuck,
According to my cpu & gpu monitors, the cpu has never hit 100% under normal conditions with wsjtx; most @ around 55-68%. Even with 40-46 decodes per pass.
Duo core w/8Gb RAM helps with
|
By
JP Tucson, AZ
·
#21366
·
|
|
locked
Re: F/H mode malfunction or operator error?
#FoxAndHound
John:
That sounds like the stations calling 4U1UN weren't correctly configured to use Hound mode, with the consequence that their stations wouldn't automatically QSY down to the 4U1UN Fox's Tx
John:
That sounds like the stations calling 4U1UN weren't correctly configured to use Hound mode, with the consequence that their stations wouldn't automatically QSY down to the 4U1UN Fox's Tx
|
By
Martin G0HDB
·
#21365
·
|
|
locked
Re: Delayed display of rcv'd decodes...
#FT8
JP:
I think that at least 1 core should be running at 100% during the decode.
The length of time it takes to complete the 3-pass decode is proportional to the CPU speed of that one core.
If your
JP:
I think that at least 1 core should be running at 100% during the decode.
The length of time it takes to complete the 3-pass decode is proportional to the CPU speed of that one core.
If your
|
By
Nc8q-mesh@gelm.net
·
#21364
·
|
|
locked
Re: Band hopping in other modes
#Cat_RigControl
#FT8
#Timesync
What crashed ?
Andy
By
Andrew OBrien
·
#21363
·
|
|
locked
Re: Tail ending my signal
#FT8
Agreed. FT8 is a DXing tool for me and has brought me to within 7 contacts needed for 5BDXCC. But when the prime bands are packed wall to wall with stateside ops happily working each other I don't
Agreed. FT8 is a DXing tool for me and has brought me to within 7 contacts needed for 5BDXCC. But when the prime bands are packed wall to wall with stateside ops happily working each other I don't
|
By
Jim Shorney
·
#21362
·
Edited
|
|
locked
Re: Multiple decodes on the same audio frequency.
#QSO_practices
Pat,
the OP reports up to three different callers being decoded on the same frequency offset, this is certainly possible with the current FT8 decoder in WSJT-X.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
Pat,
the OP reports up to three different callers being decoded on the same frequency offset, this is certainly possible with the current FT8 decoder in WSJT-X.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
|
By
Bill Somerville
·
#21361
·
|
|
locked
Re: Multiple decodes on the same audio frequency.
#QSO_practices
I have seen that a few times also
i was guessing a multi path
I have seen that a few times also
i was guessing a multi path
|
By
Pat
·
#21360
·
|
|
locked
Re: Tail ending my signal
#FT8
FT8 is a weak signal mode. At the height of the Sun spot cycle when all the fun starts, I'll be moving to SSB and some of the other digital modes where you can actually talk to people. I enjoy FT8
FT8 is a weak signal mode. At the height of the Sun spot cycle when all the fun starts, I'll be moving to SSB and some of the other digital modes where you can actually talk to people. I enjoy FT8
|
By
Austin 2E0MNV
·
#21359
·
|
|
locked
Re: WSJT Log Problem
#WSJTX_config
#FT8
Hi Woody,
WSJT-X reads only log files named WSJTX_LOG.ADI. The “X” is relevant, case is irrelevant. Try to rename it and all should work again!
73, Reino OH3mA
Hi Woody,
WSJT-X reads only log files named WSJTX_LOG.ADI. The “X” is relevant, case is irrelevant. Try to rename it and all should work again!
73, Reino OH3mA
|
By
Reino Talarmo
·
#21358
·
|
|
locked
Re: Tail ending my signal
#FT8
Jon,
I fully agree.
In my experience, WSJT-X runs best with all Filters turned OFF
and the Noise Reduction and Noise Blanker turned OFF.
Also, I often run into situations where I call someone
Jon,
I fully agree.
In my experience, WSJT-X runs best with all Filters turned OFF
and the Noise Reduction and Noise Blanker turned OFF.
Also, I often run into situations where I call someone
|
By
K8BL BOB LIDDY <k8bl@...>
·
#21357
·
|
|
locked
Re: F/H mode malfunction or operator error?
#FoxAndHound
Perhaps the other stations were not using WSJT-X; maybe they were using MSHV, for example.
73,
Rich VE3KI
Perhaps the other stations were not using WSJT-X; maybe they were using MSHV, for example.
73,
Rich VE3KI
|
By
ve3ki
·
#21356
·
|
|
locked
Re: WSJT Log Problem
#WSJTX_config
#FT8
Hi Bill,
TNX for the hint but the log file is named wsjt_log.adi and is located in C:>users>woody>appdata>local>WSJT-X which I believe is the correct name and location.
Must be something
Hi Bill,
TNX for the hint but the log file is named wsjt_log.adi and is located in C:>users>woody>appdata>local>WSJT-X which I believe is the correct name and location.
Must be something
|
By
Woody
·
#21355
·
|
|
locked
Band hopping in other modes
#Cat_RigControl
#FT8
#Timesync
Greeting. I joined seeking a solution to the WSPR band hopping error - and found it!
But the reason I did was because of a new RX only system I’m playing with consisting of a spare Pi 3B+ (does a 4
Greeting. I joined seeking a solution to the WSPR band hopping error - and found it!
But the reason I did was because of a new RX only system I’m playing with consisting of a spare Pi 3B+ (does a 4
|
By
Don Melcher
·
#21354
·
|
|
locked
Re: F/H mode malfunction or operator error?
#FoxAndHound
Yes, I understand that. But in every test I have done you can QSY manually if need be. In fact I recommend that every op learn how to use the software manually because someday your automation will
Yes, I understand that. But in every test I have done you can QSY manually if need be. In fact I recommend that every op learn how to use the software manually because someday your automation will
|
By
Jim Shorney
·
#21353
·
|
|
locked
Re: Tail ending my signal
#FT8
I think a lot of ops think running narrow filters is a good idea. I can't tell you how often I call and call someone, or someone is CQing into the wind and now answering, and only when I move close to
I think a lot of ops think running narrow filters is a good idea. I can't tell you how often I call and call someone, or someone is CQing into the wind and now answering, and only when I move close to
|
By
Jon KM8V
·
#21352
·
|
|
locked
Re: F/H mode malfunction or operator error?
#FoxAndHound
Hi Jim,
No, that is not the way F/H works. It is supposed to QSY you automatically!
73,
John, K9MM
Hi Jim,
No, that is not the way F/H works. It is supposed to QSY you automatically!
73,
John, K9MM
|
By
John, K9MM
·
#21351
·
|
|
locked
Re: F/H mode malfunction or operator error?
#FoxAndHound
Hi Bill,
I'm not seeing any problem with my CAT control. I made about 65 QSOs yesterday on FT8 and FT4. The only issue with one of my QSOs was the F/H attempt with the J28.
The issue with 4U1UN was
Hi Bill,
I'm not seeing any problem with my CAT control. I made about 65 QSOs yesterday on FT8 and FT4. The only issue with one of my QSOs was the F/H attempt with the J28.
The issue with 4U1UN was
|
By
John, K9MM
·
#21350
·
|