On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 11:56 PM, Dick Bingham wrote: Greeting to everyone AFTER getting FT8 to run after installing WSJT-X v2.4.0 software, I have discovered a new problem. I call CQ and another

Hi Bill, You keep assuming I am running something like SNTP. I am not. The system runs NTP and has an attached USB GNSS receiver that keeps the system to within about 3 milliseconds absent any other

I tried it with my laptop, using an icom 7300. Cat control worked fine and so did the audio. Maybe wsjtx just doesn't play nice with built in soundcards.

On 27/08/2021 02:43, mbigos@... wrote: Hi Marty, the reason for recommending that the last level control in the chain is used for level setting, and all other digital controls

Hi, I'm not getting into the debate about whether you need the "extra" 73, BUT, the program used to send it if RRR was selcted. I've been on 6M most of the Summer so haven't really needed to use RRR

Bill - Thanks for the feedback. My rig is a KX3 @ 5W with a MacBook Air, OSX 11.4, using CAT controls and the USB sound card. Elecraft says that in DATA A mode the audio level should just

Ok Bill Thanks! I believe the radio manual references some drivers and I’ll get them installed. I’ll keep you posted!

Hi thanks, now I have to look for some JT signals 73

Hi Ryan, OK, with "Prefer Type 1 Messages" checked yo will only send single messages with 4-character grid squares. That may help a little with hash collisions, but if a station with a hash collision

Prefer Type 1 messages is checked, I don't think I changed it. I changed the GRID to 4 characters in JTDX from 6 Characters, that is why you saw that. Now both apps are set to 4 characters.

Hi Mark, CAT control is separate from audio interfaces, you need both for full control of the rig. Looking at images of the TX-500 I see two sockets marked REM/DATA and CAT

I do have the CAT cable for the radio that is a USB Connector. I’m using the audio cable and VOX and truthfully I’m not sure what the difference is. The sound card I have, Sabrent, has the 3.5 mm

Fretting about the Two Generals Problem is vast overkill. What you want in an FT QSO is to have it end successfully and beyond a reasonable doubt. It's often handy toward this end to send a final

Ken, you are clearly not understanding the issue, how do you know that your superfluous 73 message is received by your QSO partner? 73 Bill G4WJS.

Hi Dick, you will not find any examples in the WSJT-X User Guide where a reply is sent to a received 73 message, it is neither necessary nor does it help to complete a QSO. See

Greeting to everyone AFTER getting FT8 to run after installing WSJT-X v2.4.0 software, I have discovered a new problem. I call CQ and another station responds. The software runs us thru the contact

Hi Mark, do you have a CAT interface? 73 Bill G4WJS.

On 26/08/2021 23:41, Pete W1RM wrote: Hi Pete, the only serious errors there are a failure to connect to DX Lab Suite Commander, or something that emulates that like the N1MM

Well first off thank everyone for helping me. I have the software running and am copying transmissions on the band. I can double click on CQ’s and if I enable the TX it appears to be sending.

Can anyone help me decipher what the error was and help resolve it? [SYSLOG][2021-08-26 19:36:45.589431][00:00:00.000620][info] Log Start [SYSLOG][2021-08-26