But how can you know whether you are QRMing? If I can't know whether I'm QRMing on a frequency that I've been holding for a good while (and of course I can't disagree with you on that), I don't know

Hi Randy, Well, based on my experience that has not been the case.What you may not be aware of is the fact the TX offset you are holding may be causing QRM for others that you do not hear. 73, Sam

I cannot reproduce this problem. As far as I can see, on program restart the selected decode level is properly restored in Q65, as in all other modes, -- 73, Joe, K1JT

Others may already have replied to this, but I would humbly suggest that your procedure is not serving others well. The CQer's listening periods, on a busy band, have a probability of being occupied

Yes, but that's not the situation I'm talking about. I'm talking about trying to work a particular weak station and using my filter to increase my likelihood of decoding him. I'm not listening for

You lost me here. Why would his frequency matter, as long as he has his filter set wide enough to decode you on your previous frequency? If you decoded him when he was tail-ending (on top of the

If I remember correctly the sampling rate also needs to be 48K. -- John P. WA2FZW

Try this: "If you go into System>Sound, then down to the Input section. Click the > symbol to the right of Microphone Audio. On the next screen look for the Enhance Audio section and click on

Windows  audio should ideally be at 0dB (you can right-click the level in the sound manager to change it to dB). Anything over 0dB is a digital multiplication which provides no benefit at all. Analog

Hi, My original response (Mon, Aug 22, 2022 8:14 pm) to this thread included this line:"The only guarantee that you can have for a clear offset at the intendent target is if you pick the same offset

I had the same issue. Enable the codec, but also check the level control in settings. Mine was so low that I didn't get enough audio into the transmitter to get the WSJT-X output. Barry Priddy -

If you are calling CQ on 1000Hz and I am answering on 2000 Hz, then your 250 HZ filter centered on 1000 Hz is degrading my signal. :-| In regard to FT8, I regard a narrow filter is one that rejects

I want to apologize a bit in advance as I have age related digital issues. In Windows 11 I see the USB codec for speakers. Under General/Audio it says Allow apps and Windows to use this device for

Alas, no thanks, because the 'tail-ender' is likely still on the CQ'ers frequency. :-| 73, Chuck

+1 As I mentioned: "often they answer in their next time slot and give me a 'R+NN'." i.e. Not a R-24 or R-1, but a R+value indicating that they received sufficient SNR to be decoded. Alas, perhaps the

Without knowing why, this is the practice I've developed. The explanation is helpful. Another poster mentioned adjusting this gain by the Windows input level control. I have been making the

This is where my thinking was going. Thanks for confirming.

2.6.0 rc3 - Win10 Mode Q65: Decode Fast does not persist. Close/reopen WSJT-X goes always to Decode Deep. Thanks, 73 Alessandro i2sva

122515 2 -0.1 571 ~ AA2ZZZ RR73; N2YCH <XX2XX> +00 Hi Conrad, Those station are using a derivate of the wsjt-x that uses that combined message. The combined message with RR73 is only used,

program called mshv, a variation of wsjtx Dave Garber VE3WEJ / VE3IE <conradtrautmann@...> wrote: