Hi Don, Yes, see User Guide 11. Logging especially one but last paragraph. You may wish to backup your wsjtx_log.adi file before replacing it with the aclog.adi file. 73, Reino OH3mA

actually export your log to an adi, and rename or save as wsjtx_log.adi and move or copy it to the wsjtx 'appdata folder Dave Garber VE3WEJ / VE3IE drdonporter.com@groups.io> wrote:

Hi Ed, I base my comments on the https://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/k1jt/FT8_DXpedition_Mode.pdf The first message hound sends is just call sign on the protocol point of view even, if you have sent

Now, now. Be reasonable. That 1.55dB must make a lot of difference in an HF pile-up.

Hi Reino, tnx for your detailed explanation. I use WSJT-X FT8 mainly on 6m and 4m. It is quite useful to see the reception reports of my CQ in PSK Reporter. There are often short ES or TEP

Does your radio overheat and drop power when working SSB? I would suggest that the radio does not have a good 'duty cycle'. What happens if you key down in CW for several 30 second intervals for a

Dave Garber VE3WEJ / VE3I Dave, I don't understand, they are the initiator of the response decode / contact so it is obvious they have my signal report, and then respond with my signal rpt. Secondly,

Outlook LT Gil W0MN Hierro Candente Batir de Repente 44.08226 N 92.51265 W EN34rb

Thank you Michael. Much appreciated compared to Mr. Sanctimonious admonishing someone for running 50 watts instead of 35. Seriously? Tim, N2TC

Got it! Thanks again

running WSJT-X 2.6.0-rc4 on Armbian 22.08.0-trunk Bullseye with Linux 5.15.63-sunxi64 on a Inovato Quadra using FLrig for CAT and CM-108 sound fob for keying WSJTX only keys FLrig 30-40% of the

where auto seq is, but only when in f/h mode Dave Garber VE3WEJ / VE3IE

Thanks Bill! Where can I find the "Receive All" check box. I didn;t find it. Thanks again!! 73 Bob WM6Q

Good day Can the aclog adi be imported into wsjt as an update to the .adi in the log directory?

25w? You need to be running 1500! -Michael

Steve... Got your email. Replied. Not sure why you didn't get the earlier message. -- John P. WA2FZW

I believe this has been fixed for RC5. Mike W9MDB

There's been a lot of RR73 problems lately.  TT3T was no sending RR73's for the most part which was causing confusion. Other's we've seen the band fading to did not see the RR73 from Fox -- even

Thank you, Neil.

Hi John, It seems that developers has decided not to support a "hashed" CQ as none of the receiving station would know how to present it with a call sign and everybody would see just 'CQ < . . . >