main@WSJTX.groups.io

Complete FT4 and FT8 contest QSOs

The standard for a complete HF contest QSO for CW, RTTY and SSB is for the running (CQ) station to confirm the QSO to the calling (S&P) station and solicit another QSO, all in one short, immediate

By Kermit Lehman · #8313 ·

Re: NOTHING BUT TROUBLE AFTER WINDOWS 10 UPDATE

I certainly second third and fourth your post. I use DXLabs and a lot of other software that is available only for Windows so must use it. That said Allow update Use only Defender or whatever goes

By Gilbert Baron · #8312 ·

Re: WSJT Windows Problems

Bob, Windows 7 is out of support so no new security fixes are being published, further to that you appear have deliberately failed to install security updates when they were available before January

By Bill Somerville · #8311 ·

Re: NOTHING BUT TROUBLE AFTER WINDOWS 10 UPDATE

Greetings John, i scrolled to services but where is properties? It didn’t seem to be in the long list. I am surely missing something. Many thanks Eli, N6PF

By eam1212003 · #8310 ·

WSJT Windows Problems

Group, At the risk of tempting fate, here is what I have running for WSJT in my Shack problem-free for FT8/4 since January 2018 and almost 20K QSOs. The Computer is a Dell Optiplex 780 running Win-7

By K8BL BOB LIDDY <k8bl@...> · #8309 ·

Re: NOTHING BUT TROUBLE AFTER WINDOWS 10 UPDATE

Group: This is really a bad idea. The groups.io web site for this group contains many discussions on how this is resolved properly. To not update your windows laptop or desktop, or any machine,

By Bill Lederer · #8308 ·

QSO definition

Hi Tom (GM8MJV) The definition of a QSO is included in the IARU Region 1 HF Handbook (Chapter 2.1.1): 2.1.1 QSO-DEFINITION A definition for a valid QSO is: A valid contact is one where both

By Tom V. Segalstad · #8307 ·

Re: Scoring for FT4 file

Hi Bob I doubt we will see a standard - this is one of the most ‘done to death’ topics here. There are two camps and neither will budge. Like you, personally I like the 73 but then I have been

By Tom Melvin · #8306 ·

Re: NOTHING BUT TROUBLE AFTER WINDOWS 10 UPDATE

The following "points of interest" come to mind: 1. clock sync. Have a look at the DT value of those that do decode. Compare them with your ham friends. 2. CPU load. If the CPU load is high the

By Dick · #8305 ·

Re: Scoring for FT4 file

Hi, Correct me if I'm wrong. But you cannot TX, in FT4/8, after you send RR73 for 7.5/15 secs due to the program. Surely in that time if the other station sends 73 you'll see it anyway. If they

By Bob G8HGN · #8304 ·

Re: Scoring for FT4 file

Not true. You know that the other station copied your R if he calls another station or calls CQ; you know he didn't if he sends R again. This is how virtually all contesters and DXpeditioner operators

By Jim Brown · #8303 ·

Re: Scoring for FT4 file

The final 73 is necessary during the contest as it is an indication that the other station has received your R. The choice without a 73 is to either assume the other station has received your R and

By Roger · #8302 ·

Re: NOTHING BUT TROUBLE AFTER WINDOWS 10 UPDATE

Don, Undo the windows update! Then - Turn off windows updates under "services" > properties > choose "diabled" > & "stop"! Warning! Windows... sucks (no kidding...) & it will keep turning windows

By JP Tucson, AZ · #8301 ·

Re: Directional CQ with more than 3 letters?

3 or even 4 directional codes work just fine - at least with "regular" callsigns. Just edit message 6. It will remain even after a QSO is complete. 73 de va7qi, ....Erik.

By va7qi · #8300 ·

Re: NOTHING BUT TROUBLE AFTER WINDOWS 10 UPDATE

How is your clock synchronization? -- 73 de Amir K9CHP ARRL, Emergency Coordinator, Onondaga County, NY Radio Amateurs of Greater Syracuse www.ragsclub.org Wilderness SAR www.wsar.org

By Amir K9CHP · #8299 ·

NOTHING BUT TROUBLE AFTER WINDOWS 10 UPDATE

Hello – This has probably been discussed many time before, but I just joined WSJTX groups and do not seem to be able to find a subject forum for my issue. Perhaps someone can help me out,

By arsk5db@... · #8298 ·

Re: Directional CQ with more than 3 letters?

Sorry, my message subject is erroneous. He wants to do CQ's with geographic abbreviations of three letters, not more than that.

By Frank · #8297 ·

Directional CQ with more than 3 letters?

I have a friend who is interested in doing directional CQ's where the geographic abbreviation would be greater than two letters. Is this possible? He's tried some experiments, but his CQ line has been

By Frank · #8296 ·

Re: Scoring for FT4 file

Hi Roger Yes the log was accepted ok. I wonder if the ‘Claimed Score’ box was the one generated by WSJT-X as part of the Cabrillo export and NOT from the RSGB robot. As we re-score anyway you

By Tom Melvin · #8295 ·

Re: Scoring for FT4 file

N1mM Logger is not available for Linux

By Roger · #8294 ·

Messages