|
Locked
Re: Strange callsign - wrong decoding ? - SLKFD1
More likely just a bad decode. They can look very convincing.
73
-Jim
NU0C
"Arthur Bernstein via groups.io" <n2ka@...> wrote:
More likely just a bad decode. They can look very convincing.
73
-Jim
NU0C
"Arthur Bernstein via groups.io" <n2ka@...> wrote:
|
By
Jim Shorney
·
#14594
·
|
|
Locked
Re: No GPS, no NTP time sync. Can software be written to use WWV?
I would be curious if people are going into the Windows clock setup and using the "Internet" time tab to pick a reasonable government time server ( assumedly Windows is using NTP ) to set
I would be curious if people are going into the Windows clock setup and using the "Internet" time tab to pick a reasonable government time server ( assumedly Windows is using NTP ) to set
|
By
Williams, G (af8c) <af8c@...>
·
#14593
·
|
|
Locked
Re: No GPS, no NTP time sync. Can software be written to use WWV?
When my uncle bought one of the early LED watches back in the mid 70s the instructions included a phone number for WWV to accurately set the time. "Oh, yeah, I can get that on the radio" said the
When my uncle bought one of the early LED watches back in the mid 70s the instructions included a phone number for WWV to accurately set the time. "Oh, yeah, I can get that on the radio" said the
|
By
Jim Shorney
·
#14592
·
|
|
Locked
Re: No GPS, no NTP time sync. Can software be written to use WWV?
Cool. I didn't know about the time fudge software. Next time I'll suggest that. As for the elevated privileges I didn't think about that being an issue.
Jul 27, 2020 at 09:01 AM, Kai-KE4PT wrote:
Cool. I didn't know about the time fudge software. Next time I'll suggest that. As for the elevated privileges I didn't think about that being an issue.
Jul 27, 2020 at 09:01 AM, Kai-KE4PT wrote:
|
By
Jason B
·
#14591
·
|
|
Locked
Re: No GPS, no NTP time sync. Can software be written to use WWV?
45+ years ago. I used it when I was in a small radio station
(with no network affiliation or audio wire) back in the 1970's.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
45+ years ago. I used it when I was in a small radio station
(with no network affiliation or audio wire) back in the 1970's.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
|
By
Joe Subich, W4TV
·
#14590
·
|
|
Locked
Re: No GPS, no NTP time sync. Can software be written to use WWV?
Perhaps you did not get that there are circumstances where GPS or LAN connections are not practical. The club shack I administer is one. This does not hamper operation in the slightest. What do you do
Perhaps you did not get that there are circumstances where GPS or LAN connections are not practical. The club shack I administer is one. This does not hamper operation in the slightest. What do you do
|
By
Jim Shorney
·
#14588
·
|
|
Locked
Re: Strange callsign - wrong decoding ? - SLKFD1
Speaking of weird decodes, on July 14 at 1819Z I was called by B0CHR, PP34 and was given –13 report. Oh yes, it was on 6 meters. PP34 is Siberia near Manchuria, I think. B0 should be China. Someone
Speaking of weird decodes, on July 14 at 1819Z I was called by B0CHR, PP34 and was given –13 report. Oh yes, it was on 6 meters. PP34 is Siberia near Manchuria, I think. B0 should be China. Someone
|
By
Arthur Bernstein
·
#14587
·
|
|
Locked
Re: Strange callsign - wrong decoding ? - SLKFD1
Looks like a good contest message.
212130 -time
-24 sig stength
TU: - thank you
WF8EWD - callsign 1 U.S.
OE9XUQ - callsign 2 Austria (neither seems "strange")
R 579 - signal report
0782 -
Looks like a good contest message.
212130 -time
-24 sig stength
TU: - thank you
WF8EWD - callsign 1 U.S.
OE9XUQ - callsign 2 Austria (neither seems "strange")
R 579 - signal report
0782 -
|
By
JP Tucson, AZ
·
#14586
·
|
|
Locked
Re: Strange callsign - wrong decoding ? - SLKFD1
got a really long decode yesterday 212130 -24 TU:WF8EWD OE9XUQ R 579 0782
I did have AP on - but that takes a lot AP imagination ???
this was 50.313 1965
Hank K7HP
got a really long decode yesterday 212130 -24 TU:WF8EWD OE9XUQ R 579 0782
I did have AP on - but that takes a lot AP imagination ???
this was 50.313 1965
Hank K7HP
|
By
Henry Pfizenmayer
·
#14585
·
|
|
Locked
Re: Go back from v 2.2.2
eoh is already there :(
By
Ronnie Hull <w5sum@...>
·
#14584
·
|
|
Locked
Re: Go back from v 2.2.2
I copied from VE3KI earlier message:
Start WSJT-X.
If the error message appears, just click on OK and continue.
Use the "File > Open log directory" menu item in WSJT-X to open a file manager window
I copied from VE3KI earlier message:
Start WSJT-X.
If the error message appears, just click on OK and continue.
Use the "File > Open log directory" menu item in WSJT-X to open a file manager window
|
By
Kyle Chavis <wa4pgm@...>
·
#14583
·
|
|
Locked
Re: Go back from v 2.2.2
Ronnie,
all you need do is a simple edit on the WSJT-X ADIF log file. Change the header line where is has <eh> to <eoh>. The issue is due to a defect in WSJT-X v2.2.2 when
Ronnie,
all you need do is a simple edit on the WSJT-X ADIF log file. Change the header line where is has <eh> to <eoh>. The issue is due to a defect in WSJT-X v2.2.2 when
|
By
Bill Somerville
·
#14582
·
|
|
Locked
Re: Go back from v 2.2.2
IM going to go back too. I installed 2.2.2 and every since then when I load it I get a .adi error. It never saves the .adi apparently, and every time I run it now it has lost what countries, grids and
IM going to go back too. I installed 2.2.2 and every since then when I load it I get a .adi error. It never saves the .adi apparently, and every time I run it now it has lost what countries, grids and
|
By
Ronnie Hull <w5sum@...>
·
#14581
·
|
|
Locked
Re: Go back from v 2.2.2
Darn . .hit send before I finished. Here's the rest:
I have made an update to my WSJT-X BRIDGE so that all DXbase users
can use my BRIDGE all ok - with the new WSJT-X ver 2.2.2 program ..
To use
Darn . .hit send before I finished. Here's the rest:
I have made an update to my WSJT-X BRIDGE so that all DXbase users
can use my BRIDGE all ok - with the new WSJT-X ver 2.2.2 program ..
To use
|
By
neil_zampella <neilz@...>
·
#14580
·
|
|
Locked
Re: Go back from v 2.2.2
Um .. I did a Google Search on DXBase and WSJT-X, and found this:
Joe WA6AXE's WSJT-X BRIDGE (newest version) -- is NOW usable with WSJT-X ver 2.2.2
On 7/27/2020 6:04 PM,
Um .. I did a Google Search on DXBase and WSJT-X, and found this:
Joe WA6AXE's WSJT-X BRIDGE (newest version) -- is NOW usable with WSJT-X ver 2.2.2
On 7/27/2020 6:04 PM,
|
By
neil_zampella <neilz@...>
·
#14579
·
|
|
Locked
Re: Go back from v 2.2.2
On 28/07/2020 00:04, N2TK, Tony via groups.io wrote:
Hi Tony,
you can download installers for previous versions of WSJT-X from the project Source Forge files area:
On 28/07/2020 00:04, N2TK, Tony via groups.io wrote:
Hi Tony,
you can download installers for previous versions of WSJT-X from the project Source Forge files area:
|
By
Bill Somerville
·
#14578
·
|
|
Locked
Go back from v 2.2.2
I want to go back to an earlier version of WSJT. Trying to figure out why I don’t auto-log into DXBase anymore using WSJT-X ver 1.80 to DXBase Bridge.exe.
By going back I hope to find out if it is
I want to go back to an earlier version of WSJT. Trying to figure out why I don’t auto-log into DXBase anymore using WSJT-X ver 1.80 to DXBase Bridge.exe.
By going back I hope to find out if it is
|
By
N2TK, Tony
·
#14577
·
|
|
Locked
Re: How to increase the allowable decode DT
Solution found – upgrade to V2.2.2
Mark Lunday, WD4ELG
Greensboro, NC FM06be
wd4elg@...
http://wd4elg.blogspot.com
SKCC #16439 FISTS #17972 QRP ARCI #16497
Solution found – upgrade to V2.2.2
Mark Lunday, WD4ELG
Greensboro, NC FM06be
wd4elg@...
http://wd4elg.blogspot.com
SKCC #16439 FISTS #17972 QRP ARCI #16497
|
By
Mark, WD4ELG
·
#14576
·
|
|
Locked
Re: No GPS, no NTP time sync. Can software be written to use WWV?
Wow! Thanks Richard,
I did not realize that WWV had added the time by phone.
Call connected, verified right on time with atomic clock - phone # added to phone contact list.
Thanks again.
73 - John -
Wow! Thanks Richard,
I did not realize that WWV had added the time by phone.
Call connected, verified right on time with atomic clock - phone # added to phone contact list.
Thanks again.
73 - John -
|
By
JP Tucson, AZ
·
#14575
·
|
|
Locked
Re: How to increase the allowable decode DT
On 27/07/2020 23:26, M Lu wrote:
Hi Mark,
such a feature would not be practical for a QSO mode with less than 3 seconds idle between Rx and Tx periods. 3 seconds latency is
On 27/07/2020 23:26, M Lu wrote:
Hi Mark,
such a feature would not be practical for a QSO mode with less than 3 seconds idle between Rx and Tx periods. 3 seconds latency is
|
By
Bill Somerville
·
#14574
·
|