ok I finally found it, for some reason the search did not find it so, i went in the hard way c:/wsjtx and there they were. hooda thunk it?

Bookmark this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WSJTX/links/ This contains links to the WSJT-X Quick Start Guide and the WSJT-X Windows software. -- 73 Ian, G3NRW > > > > >

Guys, please remember tho that the high noise environment is the reason for these modes. If you are in a low noise environment, you would be better served with a faster digital mode that can take

gonna close out the 160m band poll Sunday eve. results to be posted asap. david/wd4kpd

At: http://www.physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/wsjt.html 73, Bill NJ1H

-- cq 1839.5 jt9-1 @ 1300hz right now 2042z. seeking first EU qso on this new mode. david/wd4kpd God's law is set in stone..everything else is negotiable.

David, you were R-13 I'm sorry you could not get the report over the air. )-= Very 73, Glenn WB2LMV

Problem IS, 160 is NOT an option for many of us inurban environs. I for example could hear you guys last night on 160 by ear, but thepulsating line noise (insulator arc-over) made decoding

there is not hard rule about what frequency band you want to run jt9 on . if you are interested in a schedule on 30 meters, please let me know. -- Phil KA1GMN

I hear you..... But I guess my real point is that this particular mode was and is being designed with high noise as its reason for living..... Which is not a bad reason for living on 160 and 80, too

160 meters is not an option him. If he wants to get a group going on some other band, that's their business.-- Phil KA1GMN

Seems there has been an expression of interest on 80 meters 3.581.- 40 meters 7.074 and -30 meters 10.130 Even urban Auckland 80meters for me is s9 and 160 just no way. But 30 has been fun I have

As an aside, I worked with Lentus last winter. Lentusrequires a close time sync, and many thought it would limit itself tothe lower freqs, but in experimentation, we were able to use it up toand thru

I can concur with all that Mike, but job #1 is to get asignal, see what it looks like and commence a contact, even IF its notunder conditions the mode may very well be able to support. Right now Ive

I have noticed I had to turn my interface audio up a bit compared to jt65hf signals to get a decode. I could also hear a signal but nothing on the waterfall. Don zl1atb

Steve, that is true..... If you aren't getting it to decode under good conditions, then it isn't ready for prime time testing on the band(s) it was really intended for. Good point! Maybe we can try

Steve, There is also some activity on 10m at 28.078, I made a contact to France today with 1w. Good Luck, John - kc2rxs

Who ever might be watching the group posts tonight, I am going to try 1.8395 1300hz JT9-5 for a while de N8YOH dm14il running 8 watts 160M loop

oops, 1100... I keep getting ptt error 4, then I have to shut down and re boot on JT9-5 or higher, anybody else getting that. I am running signal link; 857D Win 7 pent 5...?

Hi, I just tried JT9-5, and have the same problem as you describe. I'm just running a simple Donner interface, and XP. john - kc2rxs