Relax, Laurie, no one is trying to force anyone to do anything. As I have said before, both developers are saying the same thing and they have good points. In a perfect world the authors of operating

Please, let's not get into the "my software is better than yours" discussion. It is neither relevant nor productive. I have both your software and N3FJP on my Windows boxen and they each fill a

Steve, Now I read the whole chain and understood your point. Perhaps they did not even wanted participate the contest, but only wished to get a QSO with you? I have had that kind of ‘nuisance’ as

And DXKeeper, part of the FREEWARE DXLab Suite of programs is a VERY capable logger, far superior to ACLog. The other elements of the suite include rig control, a spot collection presented based on

On 11/05/2020 4:05 am, Jim Shorney wrote: The SIGNIFICANT difference between WSJT-X and ACLog is that WSJT-X is free software, ACLog is not. Any enhancements that increase

If the WSJT-X developers add an interface for a single logger, they'd have add interfaces for almost every logger. I'd rather see them continue to improve the existing modes, and add modes

I guess I wasn't clear enough, Reino....they sent a signal report as the first transmission....there is no signal report in NA VHF Contest mode. 73, Steve

That would be up to the log program developer, as WSJT-X just offers the UDP connection and that's all. Whereas JT-Alert will actually update and read most logger databases directly

Which indeed I have. I have been a satisfied user of N3FJP sofwares for around 20 years. It meets my needs and there are workarounds for minor frills that I don't "need". Do not misunderstand, I am

Roger, That's life. By the way do you have means how to get the grid from a special call station? Of course you don't need to work those at all, hi! 73, Reino OH3mA On 10/05/2020 16:46, Reino Talarmo

We should also pick our software packages based on the functions they provide vs. the functions that we want. Not smart, if you need a truck, to go buy a mini-Cooper ... also not wise to ask the

Hi, It looks like a carrier started at the bottom of your screen, (or you came upon it at that point), at around 1230 Hz, higher than your dial frequency, and over the period of one minute moved

I can appreciate that. I started out with paper logging as well in the mid 70s. I still do a lot manually that today's hams insist on using computer control for, but for logging I find that the

Personally I choose to run N3FJP ACL independently of WSJT-X (and of fldigi too). It’s little effort to type in the log entry, and it increases the sense of actively operating my station. Also,

"Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@...> wrote: That's a little unfair. Scott's perspective is not unlike that of the WSJT-X developers. He worked to create a functional and useful API geared towards

"Steve Wilson via groups.io" <steve_wilson@...> wrote: It is good that you asked, and I appreciate the additional perspective that G4WJS provided. We have two sides with very busy

Scott has the typical "not invented here" syndrome. The WSJT-X developers have chosen to develop/support a generic UDP broadcast format that is supported by *several* logging programs. If Scott

I wondered why people didn't use the "proper sequence". I like to plot my contacts on a map - I use an API available from DxAtlas, and the centre of a prefix area is not good enough. I also download

Per Scott's site, that is up to WSJT-X to support, not Scott. That is why I posted here.

if you would rather not use jtalert, then gridtracker will listen on a udp port, and log to a few different logging programs, as selected. just another option for you Dave Garber VE3WEJ / VE3IE