|
Locked
Re: 60 meters: Operating guidelines for FT8
I see you're a director with the ARRL, GREAT, giving a "refresher" to someone on how to read an emission type is, and always will be a bit snarky, I question FT8's appropriateness much more than lack
I see you're a director with the ARRL, GREAT, giving a "refresher" to someone on how to read an emission type is, and always will be a bit snarky, I question FT8's appropriateness much more than lack
|
By
Seannon Baker (AG0NY)
·
#6667
·
|
|
Locked
Re: 60 meters: Operating - FT8
Hey! Has anybody asked about 60 meters and FT8?
Hey! Has anybody asked about 60 meters and FT8?
|
By
Chuck Adams
·
#6666
·
|
|
Locked
Re: 60 meters: Operating - FT8
I think we've just about killed this subject. If you couple of
guys want to keep arguing minutia, spare us other hundreds
and take it off-line already. GEEEEESH!
de Bob K8BL/5
I think we've just about killed this subject. If you couple of
guys want to keep arguing minutia, spare us other hundreds
and take it off-line already. GEEEEESH!
de Bob K8BL/5
|
By
K8BL BOB LIDDY <k8bl@...>
·
#6665
·
|
|
Locked
Re: 60 meters: Operating guidelines for FT8
97.307(f)(14) has the table of allowed emissions for 60m. It states that 2K80J2D is an allowed emission type. FT8 is a J2D emission that is less than 2.8kHz in bandwidth therefore it falls under
97.307(f)(14) has the table of allowed emissions for 60m. It states that 2K80J2D is an allowed emission type. FT8 is a J2D emission that is less than 2.8kHz in bandwidth therefore it falls under
|
By
Ria, N2RJ
·
#6664
·
|
|
Locked
Re: 60 meters: Operating guidelines for FT8
except the R&O is not the law, CFAR is, it specifically states PACTORIII, PSK31 CW and RTTY not all iterations of these emissions codes, so, no, it's NOT clear there, but, that's my interpretation,
except the R&O is not the law, CFAR is, it specifically states PACTORIII, PSK31 CW and RTTY not all iterations of these emissions codes, so, no, it's NOT clear there, but, that's my interpretation,
|
By
Seannon Baker (AG0NY)
·
#6663
·
|
|
Locked
Re: 60 meters: Operating - FT8
Umm, I think that you missed the point... YOU are the secondary user, they don't need to tell you anything, you just follow the rules in place and monitor the frequency, keep your TX on the correct
Umm, I think that you missed the point... YOU are the secondary user, they don't need to tell you anything, you just follow the rules in place and monitor the frequency, keep your TX on the correct
|
By
Seannon Baker (AG0NY)
·
#6662
·
|
|
Locked
Re: 60 meters: Operating guidelines for FT8
The R&O is crystal clear.
28. Finally, we agree with commenters that limiting digital operation
to a specific technique
discourages the further development of additional techniques, which
may be more
The R&O is crystal clear.
28. Finally, we agree with commenters that limiting digital operation
to a specific technique
discourages the further development of additional techniques, which
may be more
|
By
Ria, N2RJ
·
#6661
·
|
|
Locked
Re: 60 meters: Operating guidelines for FT8
from the R&O here...
By
Seannon Baker (AG0NY)
·
#6660
·
|
|
Locked
Re: Apologies
I can only imagine your surprise when you heard from him.
:^)
I can only imagine your surprise when you heard from him.
:^)
|
By
Steve
·
#6659
·
|
|
Locked
Re: 60 meters: Operating guidelines for FT8
the fact that we're secondary isn't as much of a big deal as we were given very specific rules to follow, 5 channels, restricted power, specifically limited emissions, and very specific instructions
the fact that we're secondary isn't as much of a big deal as we were given very specific rules to follow, 5 channels, restricted power, specifically limited emissions, and very specific instructions
|
By
Seannon Baker (AG0NY)
·
#6658
·
|
|
Locked
Re: 60 meters: Operating guidelines for FT8
"I'm not even entirely convinced that it's legal for us to use FT8 on
this band AT ALL because they don't specify it, they mention CW,
PSK31, PACTORIII (not AMTOR or any other similar modes)
"I'm not even entirely convinced that it's legal for us to use FT8 on
this band AT ALL because they don't specify it, they mention CW,
PSK31, PACTORIII (not AMTOR or any other similar modes)
|
By
Ria, N2RJ
·
#6657
·
|
|
Locked
Re: 60 meters: Operating guidelines for FT8
We are secondary on several bands, including 70cm, 1.2GHz and 30m.
Lots of amateur spectrum is secondary, with the primary users being US
Government and the military.
This certainly isn't unique to
We are secondary on several bands, including 70cm, 1.2GHz and 30m.
Lots of amateur spectrum is secondary, with the primary users being US
Government and the military.
This certainly isn't unique to
|
By
Ria, N2RJ
·
#6656
·
|
|
Locked
Re: 60 meters: Operating guidelines for FT8
what they're saying is if you can hear someone transmitting, wait til they're done, if you transmit and can't hear them, it's unintentional, that's ok (kinda) if you transmit on a frequency, and you
what they're saying is if you can hear someone transmitting, wait til they're done, if you transmit and can't hear them, it's unintentional, that's ok (kinda) if you transmit on a frequency, and you
|
By
Seannon Baker (AG0NY)
·
#6655
·
|
|
Locked
Re: 60 meters: Operating guidelines for FT8
Hassan, I'm going to pick out a bit of info here... you stated that being able to use full bandwidth for SSB, but only the bandwidth of a single transmission on digital, which for this band is CW, (on
Hassan, I'm going to pick out a bit of info here... you stated that being able to use full bandwidth for SSB, but only the bandwidth of a single transmission on digital, which for this band is CW, (on
|
By
Seannon Baker (AG0NY)
·
#6654
·
|
|
Locked
2019 FT Roundup Results
The results of the 2019 FT Roundup are now final and online.
https://www.rttycontesting.com/ft-roundup/2019-results/
If you are interested in seeing your LCR (log check report), please send
your
The results of the 2019 FT Roundup are now final and online.
https://www.rttycontesting.com/ft-roundup/2019-results/
If you are interested in seeing your LCR (log check report), please send
your
|
By
Don Hill AA5AU
·
#6653
·
|
|
Locked
Re: Apologies
Reminds me of when my obituary was published in the local paper a couple of years ago. First I knew of it was when I got a card from a lady who does estate settlements. I asked who died and she
Reminds me of when my obituary was published in the local paper a couple of years ago. First I knew of it was when I got a card from a lady who does estate settlements. I asked who died and she
|
By
Michael WA7SKG
·
#6652
·
|
|
Locked
Re: Computer to radio connection YAESU 857/897
It's my understanding that Commander, which is part of the excellent FREEWARE DXlab Suite offers the functionality that you're looking for.
73, Jim K9YC
It's my understanding that Commander, which is part of the excellent FREEWARE DXlab Suite offers the functionality that you're looking for.
73, Jim K9YC
|
By
Jim Brown
·
#6651
·
|
|
Locked
Re: Computer to radio connection YAESU 857/897
Thanks
I don't use HRD but this could be a reason to start!
appreciate the tip!
Frank
KB3PQT
Thanks
I don't use HRD but this could be a reason to start!
appreciate the tip!
Frank
KB3PQT
|
By
Frank Mellott
·
#6650
·
|
|
Locked
Operating guidelines for FT8
If I can offer a bit of information:
http://www.arrl.org/news/arrl-reiterates-its-case-for-new-band-at-5-mhz
Hope this helps!
’73 de JIM N2ZZ
If I can offer a bit of information:
http://www.arrl.org/news/arrl-reiterates-its-case-for-new-band-at-5-mhz
Hope this helps!
’73 de JIM N2ZZ
|
By
James F. Boehner, MD
·
#6649
·
|
|
Locked
Re: Computer to radio connection
Hi Richard
What is connected to the CAT connection on the back of the rig?
Marty kd8bj
On 2/21/20 2:23 PM, Richard DeRose wrote:
Hi Richard
What is connected to the CAT connection on the back of the rig?
Marty kd8bj
On 2/21/20 2:23 PM, Richard DeRose wrote:
|
By
Marty Hartwell <mhartwe@...>
·
#6648
·
|