Not sure what you mean by "have your receive to get signals" > Ron - KJ5XX

It only complains if you'r on 30 meters. Request to developers: Extend the "WSPR Guard Band" feature to work also on 17meters. 73's de Kari, oh2gqc

Hi Frank, at what precise frequency are you trying to listen ? i f you are on a random frequency is almost impossible that you receive anything except you are very very luck :-) First of also set mode

Can you put up your wav file so we can test it? Mike W9MDB

I thought WSJT-X complained if you transmitted over a WSPR frequency. IIRC it used to for JT-65. 73 Phil GM3ZZA Sent from Mail for Windows Sent: 24 September 2022 07:08 To:

make sure you are on USB, have your receive RF set to get signals, go to waterfall and find an active frequency to use scott w7scd aol.com@groups.io> wrote: --

If I go into the WSJT...bin folder and issue the command: JT9 -9 -b G -p 10 -f 700 -F 300 \jt9exe\220926_104120.wav the result is this lot. The file specified is a valid, and correctly decoded,

Bob, Thanks for your advice, however exactly where is the frequency tab? I think I have the same WSJT-x. I had one QSO. He had a +22. 73, Evan

Extremely interesting!

Hi Mike I forgot to add, that discrepancies may arise between programs that use a 6 character grid locator to define your home location, and JPL Horizons where you can enter your exact location, due

Hi Frank Are you seeing any evidence of signals on the waterfall? Is your PC time correct? Are the stations you are monitoring using JT65 or Q65? None of the DT values you have seen would be valid

Band 2 Meters Receive only IC-9700 with SSB Preamplifier Antenna M2 2X9 Rotor G5500 controlled by SatPC32 SuM. Frank Ousley KD9ISN #JT65

Hi Mike Yes, I think its the difference between geocentric and topocentric calculations. If you look at Moonsked, the 'Range' changes continuously in one direction (today centre of moon is moving

I want to use the command line driven JT9.EXE prog to decode some JT9-Fast signals. While the -Help option shows which tags to include for modes and submodes, I don't see any indication of what to

I had an older version of PSTRotator and they agree much better now with 17.28 -- differing by around 100km as of right now so only 0.026% between them. WSJTX 390620 PSTRotator 390506 MoonCalc

This probably doesn't answer the question but it's pretty interesting! https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_distance_(astronomy) -- John P. WA2FZW

I recently looked into this. There is no simple answer. The Apogee and Perigee vary considerably over time. See the following paper from

I have a similar problem, but it usually won't even run 15 minutes. I'm using a 590SG. Starting with version 2.4.0, I had to employ tricks to get band hopping to work. The most successful trick was

They could all be correct depending on the assumptions. Your position on the earth and the distance to the to the moon constantly varies. Examine what each of the three programs assume for the

I don't do EME myself, but several friends do. They are using one of the flavors of Q65. First questions -- what band(s), what power, what antennas? In general, you need a lot of both. The higher you