To be clear - the 'walking' is not an issue or concern at this time - I am only interested in resolving the inability to RX every other cycle when using RIG control method when operating

Thanks Bill ! 73, Karl Am 06.06.21, 10:13 schrieb Bill Somerville <g4wjs@...>:

Sounds like you do not have the audio levels set up properly. 73, ... Joe, W4TV

Hi Bill, Thanks for the response. MSCC implements a very limited set of TS-2000 CAT commands based on what I have captured from WSJT-X. PTT Method is via RTS only (using the same

Hi Mike, Well I tried it again this morning, both in parallel in the same RX cycle on 6M and MSHV always gets more decodes than WSJT-X, in some instances I cannot even seen the signals on the

Bill, I am running MacOS Big Sur and it upgraded and my wsjt-x v2.4.0 and all was good until the upgrade. Now it will start running ok and will work ok on the freq that it is on at startup but will

Bill, I am running MacOS Big Sur and it upgraded and my wsjt-x v2.4.0 and all was good until the upgrade. Now it will start running ok and will work ok on the freq that it is on at startup but will

It’s been mentioned before that there is a potential race hazard between PTT by RTS (or DTR) and the CAT command to change VFO or Frequency. This hazard is outwith the control of WSJT-X as it is

Amos, for polarization diversity you use two orthogonal linear polarization aerials each positioned equally to to incoming wave-front. The software can then derive any

Hi Amos, in order to do polarization diversity reception I/Q samples for both polarizations must be delivered in sync to the MAP65 application. The only practical way to do that

I notice that when I use wsjtx, the calculated bearing/azimuth figure sometimes doesn't match other sources such as QRZ.com. An example was just now to IO70 wsjtx says 259 degrees and 247 miles. QRZ

Hi Derek, Just out of curiosity, I ran MSHV in parallel with WSJT-X on 10 m just now, getting about a dozen decodes each cycle. I found that MSHV never got more decodes and that every two or three

Bill My H/V Yagi antenna does have 2 separate H and V outputs which are separated by quarter lambda /90 degrees phase shift. It is possible combine it to one output with Circular Polarization. Is

Bill Please explain what do you mean by 4 channel audio device feeding an interleaved pair of I/Q channels. My Flex 6600 radio can deliver 4 channels of I/Q data out of 2 separate ADC connected to 2

Amos, as discussed previously MAP65 when used for polarization diversity requires a pair of synchronized I/Q channels which must be interleaved, that is not possible if your starting point is two

One other interesting note that I believe removes RFI from the equation - I can induce the issue by changing frequencies in WSJT-X. Let's say I am on 20 meter, if I select 30 meter from the drop down,

Reino, Thank you for you testing results. My walking has stopped after disabling the 'Allow Tx frequency changes while transmitting' as suggested by Bill. I will try changing the baud rate to the rig

Sorry, did not notice Linux,follow Bill's instructions. 73, N0AN Hasan

Hi Steve, upgrading from one obsolete and unsupported version of MS Windows to another seems unwise to me, like it or not your best option is to upgrade to Windows 10. 73 Bill G4WJS.

Joe I am preparing to work EME using Q65 on 2m: I have a CROSS H/V long Yagi. I have a Flex 6600 Radio which can support 2 antennas In parallel 1. To enable the use of Q65, do I need a 2 channel