|
locked
WSPR receiving bandwidth adjustment?
#WSPR
Now and then I see a poor little WSPR signal coming in just outside of the 1400-1600 Hz standard bandwidth, so it won't be decoded as far as I understand. Wondering if there is any kind of setting in
Now and then I see a poor little WSPR signal coming in just outside of the 1400-1600 Hz standard bandwidth, so it won't be decoded as far as I understand. Wondering if there is any kind of setting in
|
By
Bruce KX4AZ
·
#23743
·
|
|
locked
Re: 2.4 rc4 and FTDX101MP
#Cat_RigControl
Downloaded 2.4 rc4. It works fine with my IC 9700 and my IC 7100. Still can't get any version of 2.4 to work with my FTDX101MP. 2.2 worked fine with the FTDX101MP. I tried an early version of 2.3 and
Downloaded 2.4 rc4. It works fine with my IC 9700 and my IC 7100. Still can't get any version of 2.4 to work with my FTDX101MP. 2.2 worked fine with the FTDX101MP. I tried an early version of 2.3 and
|
By
Buddy Morgan
·
#23742
·
|
|
locked
Re: Conflicts with KA6LMS Stations
#FT8
I'm apparently the only W1 person (actually signing up, at least) who's doing any digital KA6LMS/1 operating. All FT4/8. I enjoy it, so I'll keep at it.
The problem is one left for the log checkers
I'm apparently the only W1 person (actually signing up, at least) who's doing any digital KA6LMS/1 operating. All FT4/8. I enjoy it, so I'll keep at it.
The problem is one left for the log checkers
|
By
Kermit Lehman
·
#23741
·
|
|
locked
Re: Two program releases: WSJT-X 2.3.1 (GA) and WSJT-X 2.4.0-rc4
#Q65
Installed, running, watching new averaging behavior. Seems more sensitive, but may be an illusion. Needs many more runs to get a feel for it. 120E sync now proper (Red Line)
Tnx as always, will pound
Installed, running, watching new averaging behavior. Seems more sensitive, but may be an illusion. Needs many more runs to get a feel for it. 120E sync now proper (Red Line)
Tnx as always, will pound
|
By
Hasan Schiers N0AN
·
#23740
·
|
|
locked
Re: Conflicts with KA6LMS Stations
#FT8
Hi Paul,
that's great, please apologize for the issue, they should be able to work around it with a little care. Have a great w/e with the LMS op.
73
Bill
Hi Paul,
that's great, please apologize for the issue, they should be able to work around it with a little care. Have a great w/e with the LMS op.
73
Bill
|
By
Bill Somerville
·
#23739
·
|
|
locked
Re: Conflicts with KA6LMS Stations
#FT8
Good morning.
I'm on the KA6LMS team. I just shared the comments with them. I'm not one who's using FT8, but hopefully the ones who are can sort it out on our end.
Good morning.
I'm on the KA6LMS team. I just shared the comments with them. I'm not one who's using FT8, but hopefully the ones who are can sort it out on our end.
|
By
Paul Braun
·
#23738
·
|
|
locked
Re: Conflicts with KA6LMS Stations
#FT8
Hi John,
yes that would certainly cause issues if one of the K6LMS stations is calling CQ on the same band at the same time as another is working stations.
73
Hi John,
yes that would certainly cause issues if one of the K6LMS stations is calling CQ on the same band at the same time as another is working stations.
73
|
By
Bill Somerville
·
#23737
·
|
|
locked
Re: Conflicts with KA6LMS Stations
#FT8
Thanks Bill.
They may want to uncheck the Call 1st box.
73
John
KC4LZN
Thanks Bill.
They may want to uncheck the Call 1st box.
73
John
KC4LZN
|
By
John KC4LZN
·
#23736
·
|
|
locked
Re: Conflicts with KA6LMS Stations
#FT8
Hi John and Ken,
I can confirm there is a defect. At the K6LMS end they will see messages sending reports to their other operations, with the same base callsign, highlighted
Hi John and Ken,
I can confirm there is a defect. At the K6LMS end they will see messages sending reports to their other operations, with the same base callsign, highlighted
|
By
Bill Somerville
·
#23735
·
|
|
locked
Re: Conflicts with KA6LMS Stations
#FT8
Thanks Ken.
I may have to stick to sideband and CW then.
73
John
KC4LZN
Thanks Ken.
I may have to stick to sideband and CW then.
73
John
KC4LZN
|
By
John KC4LZN
·
#23734
·
|
|
locked
Re: Conflicts with KA6LMS Stations
#FT8
There are problems with these KA6LMS stations using different portable indicators. The WSJT-S program apparently only pay attention to the KA6LMS part of the call and therefore mixes up calls when
There are problems with these KA6LMS stations using different portable indicators. The WSJT-S program apparently only pay attention to the KA6LMS part of the call and therefore mixes up calls when
|
By
Kermit Lehman
·
#23733
·
|
|
locked
Two program releases: WSJT-X 2.3.1 (GA) and WSJT-X 2.4.0-rc4
#Q65
We are pleased to announce two new releases of program WSJT-X: a General Availability (GA) release of version 2.3.1, and release candidate RC4 of version 2.4.0. Please read this announcement and
We are pleased to announce two new releases of program WSJT-X: a General Availability (GA) release of version 2.3.1, and release candidate RC4 of version 2.4.0. Please read this announcement and
|
By
Joe
·
#23732
·
|
|
locked
Re: Easiest transceiver/computer combo to configure for FT8
#install
Hi Joghn,
By
Tom Arny
·
#23731
·
|
|
locked
Re: No Tx audio after inactivity.
#AudioIssues
It’s not the software, it’s the USB hardware that consumes power, regardless of whether it is active. Current laptops try and remove every single “unnecessary” use of power.
73 Phil.
It’s not the software, it’s the USB hardware that consumes power, regardless of whether it is active. Current laptops try and remove every single “unnecessary” use of power.
73 Phil.
|
By
Philip Rose
·
#23730
·
|
|
locked
Conflicts with KA6LMS Stations
#FT8
I worked KA6LMS/2 this morning on 80. Then KA6LMS/VE7 came on. I tried calling them and the /2 kept answering. If I addressed the /VE7 in my calling, why would the /2 pick up? Is this a bug in the
I worked KA6LMS/2 this morning on 80. Then KA6LMS/VE7 came on. I tried calling them and the /2 kept answering. If I addressed the /VE7 in my calling, why would the /2 pick up? Is this a bug in the
|
By
John KC4LZN
·
#23729
·
Edited
|
|
locked
Re: VS: [WSJTX] Import ADI Log File
#WSJTX_config
Reino thank you so much. I discovered that my logging program Log4OM placed a header in the adi file when I created it. I edited that out and all my QSOs load properly. I never would have figured that
Reino thank you so much. I discovered that my logging program Log4OM placed a header in the adi file when I created it. I edited that out and all my QSOs load properly. I never would have figured that
|
By
robert scott
·
#23728
·
|
|
locked
Re: Not able to make contact
#FT8
To: csnyder1975
Microsoft just issued an online update that included the Silicon Labs CP210X USB to UART Bridge drivers that the Icom 7100 uses to communicate with computers.
Check Device
To: csnyder1975
Microsoft just issued an online update that included the Silicon Labs CP210X USB to UART Bridge drivers that the Icom 7100 uses to communicate with computers.
Check Device
|
By
Chuck Adams
·
#23727
·
|
|
locked
Re: Not able to make contact
#FT8
If you have another receiver with WSJT set up see if you can decode yourself. Barring that see if you can get a local to take a listen.
I went thru several weeks with a W10 64 Dell workstation and
If you have another receiver with WSJT set up see if you can decode yourself. Barring that see if you can get a local to take a listen.
I went thru several weeks with a W10 64 Dell workstation and
|
By
Hank Pfizenmayer
·
#23726
·
|
|
locked
Re: Not able to make contact
#FT8
The first thing I check on my IC 7100 every morning is that the audio Codex’s have not been changed by Windows. I also have Win 10 running on a 64 system.
The first thing I check on my IC 7100 every morning is that the audio Codex’s have not been changed by Windows. I also have Win 10 running on a 64 system.
|
By
Bill McGowan
·
#23725
·
|
|
locked
Re: Upgrade 2.2 to 2.3
#install
Hi Randy,
Thanks...
looking at YouTube... I need only make 1 change in "Connectors"
Thanks...
Hi Randy,
Thanks...
looking at YouTube... I need only make 1 change in "Connectors"
Thanks...
|
By
Dave H
·
#23724
·
|