|
locked
Re: Sudden blindness to sound card and ports windows 10
#AudioIssues
#Cat_RigControl
#IssueReport
On 17/02/2021 19:27, Chris wrote:
Hi Chris,
that output is less than there should be. I would expect each device to appear twice, the second one with a "Wave ID". For example
On 17/02/2021 19:27, Chris wrote:
Hi Chris,
that output is less than there should be. I would expect each device to appear twice, the second one with a "Wave ID". For example
|
By
Bill Somerville
·
#22361
·
|
|
locked
Mac Error
#macOS
WSJT-X suddenly stopped working on my FTDX10 and Mac mini 2018 with Big Sur 11.2.1. See screen shots below.
After trying the usual remedies, I uninstalled WSJT-X, did a restart of the Mac, reloaded
WSJT-X suddenly stopped working on my FTDX10 and Mac mini 2018 with Big Sur 11.2.1. See screen shots below.
After trying the usual remedies, I uninstalled WSJT-X, did a restart of the Mac, reloaded
|
By
Michael Salmi
·
#22360
·
|
|
locked
Re: Red Frequency window on 6 Meters with
#Q65
Did you reset the Frequency list in settings?
Neil, KN3ILZ
On 2/17/2021 3:06 PM, Ben Nardi wrote:
Did you reset the Frequency list in settings?
Neil, KN3ILZ
On 2/17/2021 3:06 PM, Ben Nardi wrote:
|
By
neil_zampella <neilz@...>
·
#22359
·
|
|
locked
Red Frequency window on 6 Meters with
#Q65
In trying to set up Q65 on 6 Meters my frequency window is red and it seems no frequencies below 2 meters appear on frequency selection. I can type in 50.275 for example and that works but window
In trying to set up Q65 on 6 Meters my frequency window is red and it seems no frequencies below 2 meters appear on frequency selection. I can type in 50.275 for example and that works but window
|
By
Ben Nardi
·
#22358
·
|
|
locked
Re: Sudden blindness to sound card and ports windows 10
#AudioIssues
#Cat_RigControl
#IssueReport
Thank you for the reply, Bill. Since last post I did another "hail mary" by uninstalling and deleting all the folders including those in appdata, and downloading a fresh copy. This gave me a fresh
Thank you for the reply, Bill. Since last post I did another "hail mary" by uninstalling and deleting all the folders including those in appdata, and downloading a fresh copy. This gave me a fresh
|
By
Chris
·
#22357
·
|
|
locked
Re: PWR slider behaviour
#transmit
Thank you Bill for the link how to set up the audio.
I am aware of adjusting the audio mixer in Windows. This worked fine with my FT1000 and FTdx1200 where I set the mixer to a zero ALC reading at the
Thank you Bill for the link how to set up the audio.
I am aware of adjusting the audio mixer in Windows. This worked fine with my FT1000 and FTdx1200 where I set the mixer to a zero ALC reading at the
|
By
Nico Ebbendorf
·
#22356
·
|
|
locked
Re: WSJT-X Suggestion Box
#Q65
That's why there's third-party utilities, its not a core part of the program.
Neil, KN3ILZ
On 2/17/2021 12:53 PM, Michel Bernard VE2BJG wrote:
That's why there's third-party utilities, its not a core part of the program.
Neil, KN3ILZ
On 2/17/2021 12:53 PM, Michel Bernard VE2BJG wrote:
|
By
neil_zampella <neilz@...>
·
#22355
·
|
|
locked
Re: CQ instead of 73
#FT8
There is no grid listed in the DX GRID box ... so when the operator clicked to resend the 73, the system did not see a GRID since it was previously cleared.
Neil,
There is no grid listed in the DX GRID box ... so when the operator clicked to resend the 73, the system did not see a GRID since it was previously cleared.
Neil,
|
By
neil_zampella <neilz@...>
·
#22354
·
|
|
locked
Re: #bugreport JT4 decodes crash v2.4.0-rc1
#IssueReport
For Q65 it looks like using configurations is a must.
On the graph you need to set it to ‘Q65’ - if you just change mode the graph mode does not change. It works fine with a
For Q65 it looks like using configurations is a must.
On the graph you need to set it to ‘Q65’ - if you just change mode the graph mode does not change. It works fine with a
|
By
Tom Melvin
·
#22353
·
|
|
locked
Re: #bugreport JT4 decodes crash v2.4.0-rc1
#IssueReport
Thanks for the reply, Charlie,
I'll look into setting up different configurations as well.
Cheers - Dave (G0DJA)
Thanks for the reply, Charlie,
I'll look into setting up different configurations as well.
Cheers - Dave (G0DJA)
|
By
David Ackrill
·
#22352
·
|
|
locked
Re: CQ instead of 73
#FT8
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 01:03 PM, Bill Somerville wrote:
If your QSO partner elects to send an RR73 message in reply to your R+report message then they should not expect any reply.Bill, that is a
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 01:03 PM, Bill Somerville wrote:
If your QSO partner elects to send an RR73 message in reply to your R+report message then they should not expect any reply.Bill, that is a
|
By
Ken WB8UFC
·
#22351
·
|
|
locked
WSJT-X Suggestion Box
#Q65
Similar to JTDX, is it possible to get a WAV played when there is activity or a valid decode.
Since activity is almost invisible when signals are weak, there would be less danger of falling asleep
Similar to JTDX, is it possible to get a WAV played when there is activity or a valid decode.
Since activity is almost invisible when signals are weak, there would be less danger of falling asleep
|
By
Michel Bernard VE2BJG
·
#22350
·
|
|
locked
Re: CQ instead of 73
#FT8
John,
look again at the exchange! EA4SM never sent his gridsquare.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
On 17/02/2021 18:18, JP Tucson, AZ wrote:
John,
look again at the exchange! EA4SM never sent his gridsquare.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
On 17/02/2021 18:18, JP Tucson, AZ wrote:
|
By
Bill Somerville
·
#22349
·
|
|
locked
Re: CQ instead of 73
#FT8
Actually, I am looking at the log box with the empty "grid" block. Something I have been trying to inform you about for a while. As you
can see, it DOES happen to other users.
But hey, whatever...
Actually, I am looking at the log box with the empty "grid" block. Something I have been trying to inform you about for a while. As you
can see, it DOES happen to other users.
But hey, whatever...
|
By
JP Tucson, AZ
·
#22348
·
|
|
locked
Re: CQ instead of 73
#FT8
John,
you must be looking at a different exchange from the one I see.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
On 17/02/2021 18:07, JP Tucson, AZ wrote:
John,
you must be looking at a different exchange from the one I see.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
On 17/02/2021 18:07, JP Tucson, AZ wrote:
|
By
Bill Somerville
·
#22347
·
|
|
locked
Re: CQ instead of 73
#FT8
Notice also that the logging box DID NOT PICK UP THE GRID SQUARE! ...though it is clearly listed in the data exchanges!
73 - John - N7GHZ
Notice also that the logging box DID NOT PICK UP THE GRID SQUARE! ...though it is clearly listed in the data exchanges!
73 - John - N7GHZ
|
By
JP Tucson, AZ
·
#22346
·
|
|
locked
Re: CQ instead of 73
#FT8
On 17/02/2021 17:59, Ken WB8UFC wrote:
Ken,
the only reasonable replies to an RR73 message are either nothing, a 73 message, or some free text message sending extra
On 17/02/2021 17:59, Ken WB8UFC wrote:
Ken,
the only reasonable replies to an RR73 message are either nothing, a 73 message, or some free text message sending extra
|
By
Bill Somerville
·
#22345
·
|
|
locked
Re: CQ instead of 73
#FT8
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 12:49 PM, Ken WB8UFC wrote:
I'll try deferring the logging and see if that makes a difference.Nope. No difference.
I didn't log and it WSJT-X still sent the 73 in response to
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 12:49 PM, Ken WB8UFC wrote:
I'll try deferring the logging and see if that makes a difference.Nope. No difference.
I didn't log and it WSJT-X still sent the 73 in response to
|
By
Ken WB8UFC
·
#22344
·
|
|
locked
Re: CQ instead of 73
#FT8
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 11:27 AM, Reino Talarmo wrote:
At what point you log the QSO? Have you already logged the QSO before you receive the repeated RRR or RR73?You directed that to Chuck, but I have
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 11:27 AM, Reino Talarmo wrote:
At what point you log the QSO? Have you already logged the QSO before you receive the repeated RRR or RR73?You directed that to Chuck, but I have
|
By
Ken WB8UFC
·
#22343
·
|
|
locked
Re: CQ instead of 73
#FT8
Chuck,
That is definitely NOT the behavior I observe.
Like you, I click the "Enable Tx" immediately after logging the contact.
In the snapshot below, when that second RR73 was sent at 173600, "Enable
Chuck,
That is definitely NOT the behavior I observe.
Like you, I click the "Enable Tx" immediately after logging the contact.
In the snapshot below, when that second RR73 was sent at 173600, "Enable
|
By
Ken WB8UFC
·
#22342
·
|