|
locked
Re: CQ instead of 73
#FT8
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 01:03 PM, Bill Somerville wrote:
If your QSO partner elects to send an RR73 message in reply to your R+report message then they should not expect any reply.Bill, that is a
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 01:03 PM, Bill Somerville wrote:
If your QSO partner elects to send an RR73 message in reply to your R+report message then they should not expect any reply.Bill, that is a
|
By
Ken WB8UFC
·
#22351
·
|
|
locked
WSJT-X Suggestion Box
#Q65
Similar to JTDX, is it possible to get a WAV played when there is activity or a valid decode.
Since activity is almost invisible when signals are weak, there would be less danger of falling asleep
Similar to JTDX, is it possible to get a WAV played when there is activity or a valid decode.
Since activity is almost invisible when signals are weak, there would be less danger of falling asleep
|
By
Michel Bernard VE2BJG
·
#22350
·
|
|
locked
Re: CQ instead of 73
#FT8
John,
look again at the exchange! EA4SM never sent his gridsquare.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
On 17/02/2021 18:18, JP Tucson, AZ wrote:
John,
look again at the exchange! EA4SM never sent his gridsquare.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
On 17/02/2021 18:18, JP Tucson, AZ wrote:
|
By
Bill Somerville
·
#22349
·
|
|
locked
Re: CQ instead of 73
#FT8
Actually, I am looking at the log box with the empty "grid" block. Something I have been trying to inform you about for a while. As you
can see, it DOES happen to other users.
But hey, whatever...
Actually, I am looking at the log box with the empty "grid" block. Something I have been trying to inform you about for a while. As you
can see, it DOES happen to other users.
But hey, whatever...
|
By
JP Tucson, AZ
·
#22348
·
|
|
locked
Re: CQ instead of 73
#FT8
John,
you must be looking at a different exchange from the one I see.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
On 17/02/2021 18:07, JP Tucson, AZ wrote:
John,
you must be looking at a different exchange from the one I see.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
On 17/02/2021 18:07, JP Tucson, AZ wrote:
|
By
Bill Somerville
·
#22347
·
|
|
locked
Re: CQ instead of 73
#FT8
Notice also that the logging box DID NOT PICK UP THE GRID SQUARE! ...though it is clearly listed in the data exchanges!
73 - John - N7GHZ
Notice also that the logging box DID NOT PICK UP THE GRID SQUARE! ...though it is clearly listed in the data exchanges!
73 - John - N7GHZ
|
By
JP Tucson, AZ
·
#22346
·
|
|
locked
Re: CQ instead of 73
#FT8
On 17/02/2021 17:59, Ken WB8UFC wrote:
Ken,
the only reasonable replies to an RR73 message are either nothing, a 73 message, or some free text message sending extra
On 17/02/2021 17:59, Ken WB8UFC wrote:
Ken,
the only reasonable replies to an RR73 message are either nothing, a 73 message, or some free text message sending extra
|
By
Bill Somerville
·
#22345
·
|
|
locked
Re: CQ instead of 73
#FT8
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 12:49 PM, Ken WB8UFC wrote:
I'll try deferring the logging and see if that makes a difference.Nope. No difference.
I didn't log and it WSJT-X still sent the 73 in response to
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 12:49 PM, Ken WB8UFC wrote:
I'll try deferring the logging and see if that makes a difference.Nope. No difference.
I didn't log and it WSJT-X still sent the 73 in response to
|
By
Ken WB8UFC
·
#22344
·
|
|
locked
Re: CQ instead of 73
#FT8
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 11:27 AM, Reino Talarmo wrote:
At what point you log the QSO? Have you already logged the QSO before you receive the repeated RRR or RR73?You directed that to Chuck, but I have
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 11:27 AM, Reino Talarmo wrote:
At what point you log the QSO? Have you already logged the QSO before you receive the repeated RRR or RR73?You directed that to Chuck, but I have
|
By
Ken WB8UFC
·
#22343
·
|
|
locked
Re: CQ instead of 73
#FT8
Chuck,
That is definitely NOT the behavior I observe.
Like you, I click the "Enable Tx" immediately after logging the contact.
In the snapshot below, when that second RR73 was sent at 173600, "Enable
Chuck,
That is definitely NOT the behavior I observe.
Like you, I click the "Enable Tx" immediately after logging the contact.
In the snapshot below, when that second RR73 was sent at 173600, "Enable
|
By
Ken WB8UFC
·
#22342
·
|
|
locked
Re: #bugreport JT4 decodes crash v2.4.0-rc1
#IssueReport
correction for 'f' read 'g'.
There is also no 'g' in Q65, although it is selectable in -rc1.
correction for 'f' read 'g'.
There is also no 'g' in Q65, although it is selectable in -rc1.
|
By
g3wdg <charlie@...>
·
#22341
·
|
|
locked
Re: Subject Tags
#GeneralGroupInfo
Hi John
That hashtag now exists and I've created others to ensure they exist for every mode.
We're bound by what is possible on groups.io and I don't think it's possible to create a hashtag in that
Hi John
That hashtag now exists and I've created others to ensure they exist for every mode.
We're bound by what is possible on groups.io and I don't think it's possible to create a hashtag in that
|
By
Roger
·
#22340
·
|
|
locked
Re: Subject Tags
#GeneralGroupInfo
I had some issue, sent one to config#? No response, yet.
Bob KI0G
I had some issue, sent one to config#? No response, yet.
Bob KI0G
|
By
Bob Cutter <ki0g@...>
·
#22339
·
|
|
locked
Re: #bugreport JT4 decodes crash v2.4.0-rc1
#IssueReport
Hi David
I think that's happening because you were on a submode letter (f) when in
JT4 and when going to Q65 that would have persisted as the selected
submode.
There is currently no f submode coded
Hi David
I think that's happening because you were on a submode letter (f) when in
JT4 and when going to Q65 that would have persisted as the selected
submode.
There is currently no f submode coded
|
By
g3wdg <charlie@...>
·
#22338
·
|
|
locked
Re: CQ instead of 73
#FT8
By
Reino Talarmo
·
#22337
·
|
|
locked
Re: #Q65
#Q65
No problem, try 50.275 MHz and 30A, there seems to be a lot of activity there. People have also been on 50.235 MHz 120E
No problem, try 50.275 MHz and 30A, there seems to be a lot of activity there. People have also been on 50.235 MHz 120E
|
By
Kevin McQuiggin (VE7ZD/KN7Q)
·
#22336
·
|
|
locked
Re: #Q65
#Q65
Thanks Kevin, that helps a lot. I was looking for a button to set for sub modes. In fact this is simpler.
73
Darl NA8W
From: Kevin McQuiggin (VE7ZD/KN7Q)
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2021
Thanks Kevin, that helps a lot. I was looking for a button to set for sub modes. In fact this is simpler.
73
Darl NA8W
From: Kevin McQuiggin (VE7ZD/KN7Q)
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2021
|
By
Darl DEEDS
·
#22335
·
|
|
locked
Re: WSJT-X v2.4.0 feature request
#mainscreen
#Waterfall
JJ wrote:
The mouse wheel does 0.3dB. The up/down keys 0.1dB.
I'm not sure why such precision is required, not many can tell or measure 1dB?
73 Alan G4ZFQ
JJ wrote:
The mouse wheel does 0.3dB. The up/down keys 0.1dB.
I'm not sure why such precision is required, not many can tell or measure 1dB?
73 Alan G4ZFQ
|
By
Alan G4ZFQ
·
#22334
·
|
|
locked
Re: #Q65
#Q65
Hi Darl, after you select Q65 mode then you set the timing and sub mode using the controls in the centre part of the WSJT-X window.
For example, to set what people are calling “30A” within Q65,
Hi Darl, after you select Q65 mode then you set the timing and sub mode using the controls in the centre part of the WSJT-X window.
For example, to set what people are calling “30A” within Q65,
|
By
Kevin McQuiggin (VE7ZD/KN7Q)
·
#22333
·
|
|
locked
#Q65
#Q65
I know I am missing something really simple but I am trying to set up Q65 to listen to and maybe operate. I read the quick start guide, sorry I didn't play the test files, but I can't find how to set
I know I am missing something really simple but I am trying to set up Q65 to listen to and maybe operate. I read the quick start guide, sorry I didn't play the test files, but I can't find how to set
|
By
Darl DEEDS
·
#22332
·
|