|
Locked
Re: #bugreport JT4 decodes crash v2.4.0-rc1
#IssueReport
For Q65 it looks like using configurations is a must.
On the graph you need to set it to ‘Q65’ - if you just change mode the graph mode does not change. It works fine with a
For Q65 it looks like using configurations is a must.
On the graph you need to set it to ‘Q65’ - if you just change mode the graph mode does not change. It works fine with a
|
By
Tom Melvin
·
#22353
·
|
|
Locked
Re: #bugreport JT4 decodes crash v2.4.0-rc1
#IssueReport
Thanks for the reply, Charlie,
I'll look into setting up different configurations as well.
Cheers - Dave (G0DJA)
Thanks for the reply, Charlie,
I'll look into setting up different configurations as well.
Cheers - Dave (G0DJA)
|
By
David Ackrill
·
#22352
·
|
|
Locked
Re: CQ instead of 73
#FT8
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 01:03 PM, Bill Somerville wrote:
If your QSO partner elects to send an RR73 message in reply to your R+report message then they should not expect any reply.Bill, that is a
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 01:03 PM, Bill Somerville wrote:
If your QSO partner elects to send an RR73 message in reply to your R+report message then they should not expect any reply.Bill, that is a
|
By
Ken WB8UFC
·
#22351
·
|
|
Locked
WSJT-X Suggestion Box
#Q65
Similar to JTDX, is it possible to get a WAV played when there is activity or a valid decode.
Since activity is almost invisible when signals are weak, there would be less danger of falling asleep
Similar to JTDX, is it possible to get a WAV played when there is activity or a valid decode.
Since activity is almost invisible when signals are weak, there would be less danger of falling asleep
|
By
Michel Bernard VE2BJG
·
#22350
·
|
|
Locked
Re: CQ instead of 73
#FT8
John,
look again at the exchange! EA4SM never sent his gridsquare.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
On 17/02/2021 18:18, JP Tucson, AZ wrote:
John,
look again at the exchange! EA4SM never sent his gridsquare.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
On 17/02/2021 18:18, JP Tucson, AZ wrote:
|
By
Bill Somerville
·
#22349
·
|
|
Locked
Re: CQ instead of 73
#FT8
Actually, I am looking at the log box with the empty "grid" block. Something I have been trying to inform you about for a while. As you
can see, it DOES happen to other users.
But hey, whatever...
Actually, I am looking at the log box with the empty "grid" block. Something I have been trying to inform you about for a while. As you
can see, it DOES happen to other users.
But hey, whatever...
|
By
JP Tucson, AZ
·
#22348
·
|
|
Locked
Re: CQ instead of 73
#FT8
John,
you must be looking at a different exchange from the one I see.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
On 17/02/2021 18:07, JP Tucson, AZ wrote:
John,
you must be looking at a different exchange from the one I see.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
On 17/02/2021 18:07, JP Tucson, AZ wrote:
|
By
Bill Somerville
·
#22347
·
|
|
Locked
Re: CQ instead of 73
#FT8
Notice also that the logging box DID NOT PICK UP THE GRID SQUARE! ...though it is clearly listed in the data exchanges!
73 - John - N7GHZ
Notice also that the logging box DID NOT PICK UP THE GRID SQUARE! ...though it is clearly listed in the data exchanges!
73 - John - N7GHZ
|
By
JP Tucson, AZ
·
#22346
·
|
|
Locked
Re: CQ instead of 73
#FT8
On 17/02/2021 17:59, Ken WB8UFC wrote:
Ken,
the only reasonable replies to an RR73 message are either nothing, a 73 message, or some free text message sending extra
On 17/02/2021 17:59, Ken WB8UFC wrote:
Ken,
the only reasonable replies to an RR73 message are either nothing, a 73 message, or some free text message sending extra
|
By
Bill Somerville
·
#22345
·
|
|
Locked
Re: CQ instead of 73
#FT8
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 12:49 PM, Ken WB8UFC wrote:
I'll try deferring the logging and see if that makes a difference.Nope. No difference.
I didn't log and it WSJT-X still sent the 73 in response to
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 12:49 PM, Ken WB8UFC wrote:
I'll try deferring the logging and see if that makes a difference.Nope. No difference.
I didn't log and it WSJT-X still sent the 73 in response to
|
By
Ken WB8UFC
·
#22344
·
|
|
Locked
Re: CQ instead of 73
#FT8
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 11:27 AM, Reino Talarmo wrote:
At what point you log the QSO? Have you already logged the QSO before you receive the repeated RRR or RR73?You directed that to Chuck, but I have
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 11:27 AM, Reino Talarmo wrote:
At what point you log the QSO? Have you already logged the QSO before you receive the repeated RRR or RR73?You directed that to Chuck, but I have
|
By
Ken WB8UFC
·
#22343
·
|
|
Locked
Re: CQ instead of 73
#FT8
Chuck,
That is definitely NOT the behavior I observe.
Like you, I click the "Enable Tx" immediately after logging the contact.
In the snapshot below, when that second RR73 was sent at 173600, "Enable
Chuck,
That is definitely NOT the behavior I observe.
Like you, I click the "Enable Tx" immediately after logging the contact.
In the snapshot below, when that second RR73 was sent at 173600, "Enable
|
By
Ken WB8UFC
·
#22342
·
|
|
Locked
Re: #bugreport JT4 decodes crash v2.4.0-rc1
#IssueReport
correction for 'f' read 'g'.
There is also no 'g' in Q65, although it is selectable in -rc1.
correction for 'f' read 'g'.
There is also no 'g' in Q65, although it is selectable in -rc1.
|
By
g3wdg <charlie@...>
·
#22341
·
|
|
Locked
Re: Subject Tags
#GeneralGroupInfo
Hi John
That hashtag now exists and I've created others to ensure they exist for every mode.
We're bound by what is possible on groups.io and I don't think it's possible to create a hashtag in that
Hi John
That hashtag now exists and I've created others to ensure they exist for every mode.
We're bound by what is possible on groups.io and I don't think it's possible to create a hashtag in that
|
By
Roger
·
#22340
·
|
|
Locked
Re: Subject Tags
#GeneralGroupInfo
I had some issue, sent one to config#? No response, yet.
Bob KI0G
I had some issue, sent one to config#? No response, yet.
Bob KI0G
|
By
Bob Cutter <ki0g@...>
·
#22339
·
|
|
Locked
Re: #bugreport JT4 decodes crash v2.4.0-rc1
#IssueReport
Hi David
I think that's happening because you were on a submode letter (f) when in
JT4 and when going to Q65 that would have persisted as the selected
submode.
There is currently no f submode coded
Hi David
I think that's happening because you were on a submode letter (f) when in
JT4 and when going to Q65 that would have persisted as the selected
submode.
There is currently no f submode coded
|
By
g3wdg <charlie@...>
·
#22338
·
|
|
Locked
Re: CQ instead of 73
#FT8
By
Reino Talarmo
·
#22337
·
|
|
Locked
Re: #Q65
#Q65
No problem, try 50.275 MHz and 30A, there seems to be a lot of activity there. People have also been on 50.235 MHz 120E
No problem, try 50.275 MHz and 30A, there seems to be a lot of activity there. People have also been on 50.235 MHz 120E
|
By
Kevin McQuiggin (VE7ZD/KN7Q)
·
#22336
·
|
|
Locked
Re: #Q65
#Q65
Thanks Kevin, that helps a lot. I was looking for a button to set for sub modes. In fact this is simpler.
73
Darl NA8W
Thanks Kevin, that helps a lot. I was looking for a button to set for sub modes. In fact this is simpler.
73
Darl NA8W
|
By
Darl DEEDS
·
#22335
·
|
|
Locked
Re: WSJT-X v2.4.0 feature request
#mainscreen
#Waterfall
JJ wrote:
The mouse wheel does 0.3dB. The up/down keys 0.1dB.
I'm not sure why such precision is required, not many can tell or measure 1dB?
73 Alan G4ZFQ
JJ wrote:
The mouse wheel does 0.3dB. The up/down keys 0.1dB.
I'm not sure why such precision is required, not many can tell or measure 1dB?
73 Alan G4ZFQ
|
By
Alan G4ZFQ
·
#22334
·
|