>Now it's time for clearing up another possible point of confusion. Here is what I thought happens in FT8 with TX and RX disregarding use of fake-it and F&H. I put my TX in a clear spot so as not

Hi Steve, your assumption is incorrect, the FT8 and FT4 waveforms are constant amplitude and are suitable for non-linear amplification with suitable harmonic filtering. The GFSK tone pulse shaping

Hello to all. I’m not sure this is the right forum for my question so apologies if sent to the wrong place. I work for West Mountain Radio and our Bluetooth audio RIGblaster doesn’t appear to

FT8 used to be a (nominally) constant amplitude mode, as I understand it, which could be amplified by a Class C power amplifier with no distortion. But a few iterations back, the waveforms were

Now it's time for clearing up another possible point of confusion. Here is what I thought happens in FT8 with TX and RX disregarding use of fake-it and F&H. I put my TX in a clear spot so as

Bobby, People that answer your CQ are not actually on "your" frequency because if you were transmitting on the Even time slot, they would have had to call you on the Odd time slot and vice-versa. So,

Thanks to those in the know clearing up my error in understanding "fake-it" --73, Glenn, AF8C On 1/28/2021 2:49 AM, Markku SM5FLM via groups.io wrote: This email

I don’t mind if they call me on my frequency, why do you? There’s plenty more hertz on the band. We need to spread out a bit more.. Why are the only signals on the band in this 3 kHz plus half a

If the QSOs were on one of the standard FT8 frequencies, eg. 14074kHz or whatever, then I don't believe the HI station could have been using the WSJT-X Fox & Hounds mode because, as far as I'm aware,

DXpedition mode, or one of the offshoot pieces of software modified by outside author(s). It isn’t “supposed” to be used in the normal FT8 band segment. It is intended for DXpedition use on a

That's what I do. If they then stay where I was xmitting, I don't log it. I think some of the new hams must think they should pile on top of the calling freq because it didn't used to be a nuisance

Please use split. This has been gone over so many times but there are always those who do not listen or are stubborn. Bob - wd6dod On 1/28/2021 10:49 AM, Bobby Chandler

On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 06:49 PM, Bobby Chandler wrote: ... when I double click the calling station, my Tx does not move to the calling station, as you would think it should.Your Tx frequency will

This is the desired operation. Otherwise, people call you, complete the QSO and then try to hang onto the frequency. By choosing a clear frequency, you can stay put and never have to click anything

On 1/28/2021 10:49 AM, Bobby Chandler wrote: Bobby, That's the point of Hold TX Freq. Your frequency shouldn't move to the other station's frequency. Assuming you have a clear

This does happen to me as well, on occasion. Sean KB8JNE Spell checked by the NSA.

I'm aware of 'Hold Tx Freq' etc. and do when the band is not so crowded and there is no open hole to park. What I mean is, I answer a station calling CQ and we complete the QSO and I log it. Someone

Hi Greg, thanks for the update, glad you are up and running, You should not be surprised that intervals between release candidates shrink as issues get resolved. RC4 would have been the GA release

Builds/installs fine now Bill and first tests seem ok on FT8. A bit surprised regarding the short lifespans of these candidates after a bit of work getting them built each time...any idea when a more

Hi Tobias, of course pass the information along. It is not really a feature of WSJT-X, WSJT-X simply has a means of setting arbitrary Hamlib configuration parameters and this is