|
Locked
Re: Bug report
I meant to say set to save decoded.
On 12/1/2012 11:47 PM, qrpbear wrote:
I meant to say set to save decoded.
On 12/1/2012 11:47 PM, qrpbear wrote:
|
By
***** <signalhz@...>
·
#202
·
|
|
Locked
Re: Bug report
Joe may have left it default to save all as an aid to debugging.
73,
'Bear' NH7SR
Joe may have left it default to save all as an aid to debugging.
73,
'Bear' NH7SR
|
By
qrpbear
·
#201
·
|
|
Locked
Re: Bug report
I had it on 20 minutes today. I have 20 files saved. I had only specified set to save.
73 Eddy N4ABN
On 12/1/2012 10:32 PM, qrpbear wrote:
I had it on 20 minutes today. I have 20 files saved. I had only specified set to save.
73 Eddy N4ABN
On 12/1/2012 10:32 PM, qrpbear wrote:
|
By
***** <signalhz@...>
·
#200
·
|
|
Locked
Re: Bug report
On 01-Dec-12 qrpbear sent, on a straight key:
You got me to look and see.
I am also. These lines are in the INI file:
SaveNone=true
SaveSynced=false
SaveDecoded=false
SaveAll=false
--
Bob KD7YZ
On 01-Dec-12 qrpbear sent, on a straight key:
You got me to look and see.
I am also. These lines are in the INI file:
SaveNone=true
SaveSynced=false
SaveDecoded=false
SaveAll=false
--
Bob KD7YZ
|
By
KD7YZ Bob <kd7yz@...>
·
#199
·
|
|
Locked
Bug report
For some reason v.05_r2788 is saving all rx audio in the Save folder even when Save>None is specified... ditto when Save>Decoded is specified. Has anyone else noticed this?
73,
'Bear' NH7SR
For some reason v.05_r2788 is saving all rx audio in the Save folder even when Save>None is specified... ditto when Save>Decoded is specified. Has anyone else noticed this?
73,
'Bear' NH7SR
|
By
qrpbear
·
#198
·
|
|
Locked
Impressions
After playing with WSJTX for several days I have formed some initial impressions as follows...
1) Decodes are successful only when the "drift" is not more than +/- 1 with signal level greater than
After playing with WSJTX for several days I have formed some initial impressions as follows...
1) Decodes are successful only when the "drift" is not more than +/- 1 with signal level greater than
|
By
qrpbear
·
#197
·
|
|
Locked
Re: JT9-1 on 30m
Ill be going QRV there in about 30 minutes as well.
Steve KC2UK
Steinar Aanesland wrote:
Ill be going QRV there in about 30 minutes as well.
Steve KC2UK
Steinar Aanesland wrote:
|
By
blitz716
·
#196
·
|
|
Locked
JT9-1 on 30m
Hi all
I have been monitor 10.130 for some hours now.
This is call signs I have captured. Not so bad I think :)
F6DKQ
M0OSH
WA2HYO
OE4EPW
F1USC
SP1JPQ
OM5NA
UA1ZGI
RA9KT
GM3MZX
F8RZ
R6AJ
--
LA5VNA
Hi all
I have been monitor 10.130 for some hours now.
This is call signs I have captured. Not so bad I think :)
F6DKQ
M0OSH
WA2HYO
OE4EPW
F1USC
SP1JPQ
OM5NA
UA1ZGI
RA9KT
GM3MZX
F8RZ
R6AJ
--
LA5VNA
|
By
Steinar LA5VNA
·
#195
·
|
|
Locked
QRV 10m
28.078 +1300
Also monitoring
http://www.obriensweb.com/sked/index.php?board=digitalradio
28.078 +1300
Also monitoring
http://www.obriensweb.com/sked/index.php?board=digitalradio
|
By
blitz716
·
#194
·
|
|
Locked
Re: 20m
Nice...
Im going over to 10m, I saw someone wanted to try there, and I want tosee how well it performs on the band as well.
28.078
af5x@... wrote:
Nice...
Im going over to 10m, I saw someone wanted to try there, and I want tosee how well it performs on the band as well.
28.078
af5x@... wrote:
|
By
blitz716
·
#193
·
|
|
Locked
Re: 20m
I worked him on 5W/vertical. He was 5W/dipole.
Still trying to get him on 1 W. I'll bet N8YOH could do it
with that super-duper 160 loop of his.
73...~jess,
I worked him on 5W/vertical. He was 5W/dipole.
Still trying to get him on 1 W. I'll bet N8YOH could do it
with that super-duper 160 loop of his.
73...~jess,
|
By
af5x@...
·
#192
·
|
|
Locked
20m
Been on 14.078 for a while, band's full of jt-9, evensaw Joe's(SJT) call go by.
N'Joy
Steve KC2UK
Been on 14.078 for a while, band's full of jt-9, evensaw Joe's(SJT) call go by.
N'Joy
Steve KC2UK
|
By
blitz716
·
#191
·
|
|
Locked
Re: 7100-7125 kHz Digital?
I agree...If anyone is contemplating using Digital in this portion of the band, he should first check to see if it's allowed. In Region 2 (IARU) it's permissible. Our P.97 reg's allow it as well.
I agree...If anyone is contemplating using Digital in this portion of the band, he should first check to see if it's allowed. In Region 2 (IARU) it's permissible. Our P.97 reg's allow it as well.
|
By
Bill Harris <w7kxb@...>
·
#190
·
|
|
Locked
Re: New poll for WSJTX
On 29-Nov-12 Harris sent, on a straight key:
we have to also coordinate with Other Region-X members/hams because not
all can Use Data modes just everywhere in a band.
--
Bob KD7YZ
On 29-Nov-12 Harris sent, on a straight key:
we have to also coordinate with Other Region-X members/hams because not
all can Use Data modes just everywhere in a band.
--
Bob KD7YZ
|
By
KD7YZ Bob <kd7yz@...>
·
#189
·
|
|
Locked
WSJT-X v0.5 r2788
LA5VNA S
------
Til: rsgb_lf_group@...
To: Users of WSJT-X
From: Joe Taylor, K1JT
Revision 2788 of the experimental program WSJT-X has been posted. As
usual, a link to it appears on
LA5VNA S
------
Til: rsgb_lf_group@...
To: Users of WSJT-X
From: Joe Taylor, K1JT
Revision 2788 of the experimental program WSJT-X has been posted. As
usual, a link to it appears on
|
By
Steinar LA5VNA
·
#188
·
|
|
Locked
Re: New poll for WSJTX
I have been observing (West coast U.S.) that frequencies 7100 thru 7125 are not utilized much.Might be worth considering?
Ciao
de Bill-w7kxb . .I
To: WSJTX@...
From: af5x@...
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012
I have been observing (West coast U.S.) that frequencies 7100 thru 7125 are not utilized much.Might be worth considering?
Ciao
de Bill-w7kxb . .I
To: WSJTX@...
From: af5x@...
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012
|
By
Bill Harris <w7kxb@...>
·
#187
·
|
|
Locked
Re: Latest version WSJTX
Ok, then let me check my freq list:
1839.5 -(Too much powerline noise here for me to use)
3578. (or is it 3581.)
7039. (or is it 7074.?)
10.130
14.078
28.078
Any additions? Like 15meters? Are we in
Ok, then let me check my freq list:
1839.5 -(Too much powerline noise here for me to use)
3578. (or is it 3581.)
7039. (or is it 7074.?)
10.130
14.078
28.078
Any additions? Like 15meters? Are we in
|
By
blitz716
·
#186
·
|
|
Locked
Latest version WSJTX
Nice changes to the program. Subtle but nice. seems to be working well now... I was having a lot of problems before. I will try 160M tonight on JT9-2 and 5, they were not working right using the
Nice changes to the program. Subtle but nice. seems to be working well now... I was having a lot of problems before. I will try 160M tonight on JT9-2 and 5, they were not working right using the
|
By
flash1van
·
#185
·
|
|
Locked
Re: Revision 2786, YES!
NICE, this one worked perfect right after install.Copying
2227 10 -4 2.71472. 0 KJ1J W4ED 73
As I write, on 30m, 10.130 +1472
Steinar Aanesland wrote:
NICE, this one worked perfect right after install.Copying
2227 10 -4 2.71472. 0 KJ1J W4ED 73
As I write, on 30m, 10.130 +1472
Steinar Aanesland wrote:
|
By
blitz716
·
#184
·
|
|
Locked
Re: New poll for WSJTX
And you expect this to adopted worldwide??
And you expect this to adopted worldwide??
|
By
Paul NN4F
·
#183
·
|