main@WSJTX.groups.io

Re: WSJT-X not automatically replying

It isn’t supposed to respond by itself, unless you’re desperate enough to just take the first guy that comes along. In that case, check the Call 1st box at the bottom center of the window.

By Gary - AG0N · #18343 ·

OT: The RBN and FT4/8

Pardon the bandwidth, but we're trying to figure out whether and if so, how to augment the RBN to better facilitate FT4/8 activity. Please respond directly to me, unless the

By Pete Smith · #18342 ·

Re: Q: Installer Integrity failed for files on site

On 14/11/2020 18:12, Jon Guidry wrote: Hi Jon, on the project SourceForge files page there is a file containing SHA256 hashes for each distribution file, you can check integrity

By Bill Somerville · #18341 ·

Re: Q: Installer Integrity failed for files on site

Jon, I have had no problems, but you could try https://sourceforge.net/projects/wsjt/files/wsjtx-2.2.2/ for download. 73, Reino OH3mA

By Reino Talarmo · #18340 ·

Re: macOS Big Sur

Have either of you experienced any audio stuttering on transmit? I'm running an IC-7300 with the built-in USB audio device drivers and, maybe once every half hour, the output audio becomes

By Ross Wardrup · #18339 ·

Re: #MACOS BIG SUR

I'm running WSJT-X v2.2.2 build 0d9b9g on Big Sur and occasionally get choppy audio. I haven't been able to pinpoint if it's because of the USB audio device support baked into macOS, or if it's

By Ross Wardrup · #18338 ·

Re: macOS Big Sur

Same here - the Big Sur installation on my 2017 tbMBP relocates the sys.ctl file so had to open Terminal and put it back. All seems to be working OK except for the power slider issue that's been

By David VK3DRH · #18337 ·

Re: Error Scanning ADIF Log

Thanks, I'm new to groups.io (learning my way around) and will try to search it if I have an issue.

By st133@... · #18336 ·

Re: Error Scanning ADIF Log

Thanks Bill, just made the change using nano and it looks like it's fixed. >

By st133@... · #18335 ·

Re: WSJT-X not automatically replying

Aha! Somehow the Call 1st checkbox got cleared. Sorry for the excess noise. I really do usually try to search for the answer before posting. That's what I get for doing this when I should be sleeping!

By Steve K6WW · #18334 ·

WSJT-X not automatically replying

Hi all, Have done quite a bit of FT8 with WSJT-K and my Kenwood TS-590S. Hadn't done it in a while. When trying this evening, I'm finding that the software isn't automatically replying to a call to

By Steve K6WW · #18333 ·

Re: Error Scanning ADIF Log

On 14/11/2020 19:59, st133@... wrote: OM, this is a known issue with WSJT-X v2.2.2, you can fix it by editing the WSJT-X ADIF log file and correcting the header line. The

By Bill Somerville · #18332 ·

Re: Trouble running WSJT-X as regular user in Linux

You don't need to reboot. Just log out and and back in again. 73 Roger GW4HZA

By Roger · #18331 ·

Re: Error Scanning ADIF Log

https://wsjtx.groups.io/g/main/search?q=error+adif st133@... wrote:

By Jim Shorney · #18330 ·

Error Scanning ADIF Log

Hi all, when I first start v2.2.2 I sometimes get an Invalid ADIF header error message. Running Debian (Buster) and compiled from source. The logging seams to be working ok. Is this really ok? Wish

By st133@... · #18329 ·

Q: Installer Integrity failed for files on site

Hey, everyone - I'm getting this on my two Windows 10 systems when trying to download the current version here: http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/wsjtx-2.2.2-win64.exe: I've tried disabling

By Jon Guidry · #18328 ·

Re: wsjt-x 2.3.0 rcx

Thanks Bill

By Greg Cook · #18327 ·

Re: wsjt-x 2.3.0 rcx

Hi Greg, there will be another Release Candidate (RC2) before the 17th. Whether that becomes the General Availability (GA) release depends on what issues are found in RC2. 73 Bill G4WJS.

By Bill Somerville · #18325 ·

wsjt-x 2.3.0 rcx

Hi, Have been playing with the first release candidate (linux tarball) for 2.3.0 and note that it will be inactivated soon - Nov 17th or thereabouts. Can anyone tell me if there will be an rc2 and/or

By Greg Cook · #18324 ·

Re: Question about FreqCAL mode...

Thank you for the help! Yes, it was RIG. 73, and thanks, Dave (NK7Z) https://www.nk7z.net ARRL Volunteer Examiner ARRL Technical Specialist, RFI ARRL Asst. Director, NW Division, Technical

By Dave (NK7Z) · #18322 ·

Messages