Yes...48kHz....have run it without JT65HF too. You know the one thing I didn't try was a reboot....and avoid JT65HF for starters He's on Windows 7 64-bit with a Signalink. JT65HF decoding like a

Hi Mike, have you checked that the audio input device default sample rate is 48kHz ? Also using the same CODEC for JT65HF and WSJT-X at the same time may cause audio issues since they request

FYI...There is a JT9 signal just below 2600Hz too...with 2 JT65 sigs for a total of 3. 73 Mike W9MDB From: "dmalcolm24@... [WSJTX]" To: WSJTX@... Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2015

Yes...he can decode my files just fine. Something must be weird in his audio chain with WSJT-X. 73 Mike W9MDB From: "dmalcolm24@... [WSJTX]" To: WSJTX@... Sent: Wednesday, December 9,

Mike, I ran the fileon my WSJT-X v1.6.0-rc1, without being able to decode anything. I only saw two traces for possible decode. Have you tried it the other way? You record a sample wav and try it

Helping somebody with their WSJT-X installation. His WSJT-X is not decoding much of anything. JT65HF is perfectly happy running side-by-side. Tried both 1.6rc1 and current 1.7.0 version with no

Bill, Thank you. Yes, after several days of operating at teh50% point, I see not significant difference. I will try do decodes with both 1.5 and 1.6 to see if there is any difference. I would also

Has anyone done any evaluation or testing with version 1.7 Dev on OS-X? Are there any compiled versions of v1.7 dev available for testing or evaluation? 73, Bob

thank you Bill i think Greek is similar to Linux. hi david/wd4kpd -- God's law is written in stone...all else is negotiable.

There is one built as part of the development build but t is not shipped in the final installer. If you build WSJT-X yourself the jt65sim, jt9sim, jt4sim and, wsprsim tools are

wonder if there may be a program out there that would generate and record a jt65/jt9 signal of a desired strength ? david/wd4kpd -- God's law is written in stone...all else is negotiable.

zero offset adds a constant amount onto all values, gain multiplies each value by a constant. The two constants are set by the sliders. Another factor is that the final values have to be mapped onto

Bill... tks reply, but still have questions on setup. what is happening when this Bias is applied ? i am trying to figure out how to limit the larger signals, and still be able to discern the

Except waterfall width still affects the bandwidth being decoded, right? 73 Mike W9MDB From: "Bill Somerville g4wjs@... [WSJTX]" To: WSJTX@... Sent: Tuesday, December 1, 2015 5:23 AM

Having the Rx gain slider at around 3/4 setting is not excessive and I doubt that change will make a significant difference. We find some users have very high or low level audio and expect the slider

Bill, Thank you. Yes, the 48KHz audio sample rate is the first thing I checked. I have the Rx gain control set at about the 45dB point on the slider, which is were I had it for version 1.5. I will

Hi Bob, a common cause of poor decode performance is not having the default sample rate for your sound devices set to 48kHz. Other than that, you must set the levels correctly since too much gain

Not quite sure what you are referring to here. The slider to set the zero offset is bias applied to the waterfall and/or the spectrum display. The zero offset and gain are setting the offset and slope

Oh, and yes I have checked my clock. It is normally within +/- 0.1 seconds of actual time. 73, Bob - N7RJN

I have been using WSJT-X 1.6.0-rc1 for nearly a week now. During this time I have noticed that the JT65 decode performance is not quite as good as I expected and not as good as version 1.5. Signals