|
locked
Re: Forced Disable of RR73
#EnhancementReqest
Hello Philip Rose via groups.io:
Sunday, October 10, 2021, 12:04:27 PM, you chiseled out: Bob, If you reenable TX after sending RR73,yes sir, it does. And for ONE-Time ONLY then I have to reposition the active TX# -- Best regards, Bob KD7YZ EM88LL -- -- Bob KD7YZ in NE Kentucky
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: Forced Disable of RR73
#EnhancementReqest
Bob,
If you reenable TX after sending RR73, the program should recognise that the QSO partner repeated R+rpt and so send RR73 again. At least it does for me.
73 Phil.
Sent from Mail for Windows
From: KD7YZ Bob
Sent: 10 October 2021 16:57 To: WSJT-X List Subject: [WSJTX] Forced Disable of RR73 #EnhancementReqest
Hello WSJT-X List
So, these past few days, 12m has been SUPER into EU, Balkans,Adriatic, Southern Med.
Many many times, the other chap hasn't been able to decode my RR73. So She/He keeps sending R-11, for example. Over and over.
By MY program KEEPS REVERTING TO TX6 (CQ).
I have to try and try to reclaim TX4. Occasionally I see I didn't and I am sending CQ again.
So I wonder how many Not-Worked-DXCC entities I have missed these last few days because they, understandably, move on to others that they are decoding.
It "should" be understood that, both this side of the Atlantic and the other, my signal outgoing is from time to time stepped on ??
If so, the program should KEEP my "TX##" just where I want it, not keep moving it to CQ ...which I sure as heck don't want to do ??
Yeh, i have "Disable Tx after 73" DISABLED.
WSJTx v2.5.0 -- 73, KD7YZ Bob EM88LL
-- -- Bob KD7YZ in NE Kentucky
-- 73 Phil GM3ZZA
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: Forced Disable of RR73
#EnhancementReqest
On 10/10/2021 16:56, KD7YZ Bob wrote:
Hello WSJT-X ListBob, if your QSO partners are regularly not copying your RR73 messages then you shouldn't be sending RR73 in the first place. Double-click the Tx 4 message to switch it to the RRR format message and the QSOs will proceed as you wish. 73 Bill G4WJS.
|
|
|
|
locked
Forced Disable of RR73
#EnhancementReqest
Hello WSJT-X List
So, these past few days, 12m has been SUPER into EU, Balkans,Adriatic, Southern Med. Many many times, the other chap hasn't been able to decode my RR73. So She/He keeps sending R-11, for example. Over and over. By MY program KEEPS REVERTING TO TX6 (CQ). I have to try and try to reclaim TX4. Occasionally I see I didn't and I am sending CQ again. So I wonder how many Not-Worked-DXCC entities I have missed these last few days because they, understandably, move on to others that they are decoding. It "should" be understood that, both this side of the Atlantic and the other, my signal outgoing is from time to time stepped on ?? If so, the program should KEEP my "TX##" just where I want it, not keep moving it to CQ ...which I sure as heck don't want to do ?? Yeh, i have "Disable Tx after 73" DISABLED. WSJTx v2.5.0 -- 73, KD7YZ Bob EM88LL -- -- Bob KD7YZ in NE Kentucky
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: Working split
chas cartmel
Bob 73 Charlie G4EST www.g4est.me.uk Stay safe out there
From: main@WSJTX.groups.io [mailto:main@WSJTX.groups.io] On Behalf Of Bob McGraw - K4TAX
I set my WSJT-X software for FAKE IT or SPLIT to control the K3S radio. It really makes no difference in my case. When I answer a CQ, I double click on the calling station and let the software do the rest. When I call CQ, I choose what I see as a clear frequency on my waterfall and call. When a station calls me, maybe on my frequency or a different frequency, again I let the software do the rest. When I choose to use Hold TX Freq that is done when the band is crowded and I find a clear frequency on my receiving end. This email has been scanned by BullGuard antivirus protection.
For more info visit www.bullguard.com
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: Working split
Bob McGraw - K4TAX <rmcgraw@...>
I set my WSJT-X software for FAKE IT or SPLIT to control the K3S radio. It really makes no difference in my case. When I answer a CQ, I double click on the calling station and let the software do the rest. When I call CQ, I choose what I see as a clear frequency on my waterfall and call. When a station calls me, maybe on my frequency or a different frequency, again I let the software do the rest. When I choose to use Hold TX Freq that is done when the band is crowded and I find a clear frequency on my receiving end.
Frankly, I don't see that any of these methods is a massive benefit or a hindrance. It is just an enjoyable hobby and working stations on FT-8 or FT-4 is more like shooting birds in a cage. So easy. 73 Bob, K4TAX
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: FoxAndHoun last only 2.5 minutes
#FoxAndHound
On 10/10/2021 11:41, Amos Sobel 4X4MF wrote:
FT8 Fox and Hound have become very popular lately but it has a problem:Hi Amos, see point 11 in the "Detailed Instructions for Hounds" section in this document: https://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/k1jt/FT8_DXpedition_Mode.pdf I is intended and designed to try an minimize QRM above 1000 Hz where many Hounds may be calling together. You only need hit ENTER to restart you call. 73 Bill G4WJS.
|
|
|
|
locked
FoxAndHoun last only 2.5 minutes
#FoxAndHound
Amos Sobel 4X4MF
FT8 Fox and Hound have become very popular lately but it has a problem:
My calls for J5HKT yesterday and today on 7,10, 18 Mhz does last about 2.5 minutes. Enable Tx becomes Halt Tx. This in in contrast to the usual FT8 call which does last 6 minute by default. Is it a failure or by design? Amos 4X4MF
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: sound input error
#windows11
#AudioIssues
#Icom
Jeff Elkins
OK, after fighting this for days, I finally grabbed a ferrite and wrapped my USB cable (never had an issue with this cable with previous setups) just in case this was an RFI issue:
https://wsjtx.groups.io/g/main/topic/69952737 Absolutely no effect whatsoever. Continual sound input error dialogs. The Microphone privacy switch is not an issue as I posted earlier. So, I set up an elderly Toshiba Satellite running Windows 7, hooked it up with the same cable same driver, same software, same place in the shack, and it's been running for 7 hours w/o a hitch. The computer is a brand-new Asus VivoBook 17 K712EA, and I never dreamed that I would have any issues with it. I've got a limited amount of time to return it. I'd really appreciate feedback. 73 Jeff Elkins
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: WSJTX 2.5.0 full release issue
#decode
#QSO_practices
On 09/10/2021 18:25, JJ Knight wrote:
While calling CQ, If a station responds thru the conversation, if he sends me a 73, my software disengages the ENABLE button and resets. See image of QSO. This doesn't happen when I'm calling someone directly. I have to come back and resend the 73 manually.Hi JJ, your expectations should not be any different from the examples given in the WSJT-X User Guide: https://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/k1jt/wsjtx-doc/wsjtx-main-2.5.0.html#_standard_exchange You can always send a courtesy 73 or free text message after a QSO is done by selecting the Tx5 message, or entering a free text message there up to 13 characters, and pressing the "Enable Tx" button. 73 Bill G4WJS.
|
|
|
|
locked
WSJTX 2.5.0 full release issue
#decode
#QSO_practices
JJ Knight
While calling CQ, If a station responds thru the conversation, if he sends me a 73, my software disengages the ENABLE button and resets. See image of QSO. This doesn't happen when I'm calling someone directly. I have to come back and resend the 73 manually.
Why? JJ N5MNX
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: sound input error
#windows11
#AudioIssues
#Icom
Jeff Elkins
Yeah, I jumped through all the RealTek hoops; disabled the rt devices in device manager, disabled driver updates, even booted into safe mode and moved the rt drivers out of the way. Bill says that the RtkIntU642.dll is not likely to be related, so I guess that was a red herring.
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: sound input error
#windows11
#AudioIssues
#Icom
Alan G4ZFQ
Jeff
All the privacy options are checked.I guess we are all waiting for some genius to answer! The error seems to involve the RealTek audio device. But that should not be seen if it is disabled. In any case it has nothing to do with your setup. Have you tried uninstalling it? Even delete drivers, stop it re-installing. I did have trouble with Windows "updating" my Realtek but that just stopped it working properly. I got drivers from Realtek and all was restored. 73 Alan G4ZFQ
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: sound input error
#windows11
#AudioIssues
#Icom
Jeff Elkins
All the privacy options are checked.
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: Working split
n1ig.anthony@...
Not every caller seems to answer replies on my original tx freq. even though they saw me on freq A, they only reply when I reply on their freq B.
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: Working split
It looks like the caller in question has a large drift - ~1 Hz/minute.
BTW I second your request.
73 Phil
Sent from Mail for Windows
From: chas cartmel
Sent: 09 October 2021 12:11 To: WSJTX@groups.io Subject: [WSJTX] Working split
May I ask those responding to a CQ who are moving to the caller’s frequency to then QSY when QSO is completed. It is best to keep your transmit frequency selected to avoid this. It is unnecessary to move to the CQers frequency.
73 Charlie G4EST www.g4est.me.uk Stay safe out there
This email has been scanned by BullGuard antivirus protection. For more info visit www.bullguard.com
-- 73 Phil GM3ZZA
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: Working split
Mark Gregory <mark.gregory@...>
I tend to lock the tx frequency and then fake the split I do not operate on the callers frequency, using the waterfall display to help, like anytime in radio listen listen and listen again so your on as far as you can tell a less busy frequency.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Mark G4LCH
|
|
|
|
locked
Working split
chas cartmel
May I ask those responding to a CQ who are moving to the caller’s frequency to then QSY when QSO is completed. It is best to keep your transmit frequency selected to avoid this. It is unnecessary to move to the CQers frequency.
73 Charlie G4EST www.g4est.me.uk Stay safe out there
This email has been scanned by BullGuard antivirus protection.
For more info visit www.bullguard.com
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: re-establishing wsjtx log
#WSJTX_config
On 09/10/2021 03:21, John Wiener wrote:
Bill,Hi John, yes that is the correct location, assuming the WSJT-X directory it self is in the right location. As Reino states, an easy way to locate the right location is to use WSJT-X, "Menu->File->Open log directory" will open a new Finder window located in the correct place. 73 Bill G4WJS.
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: re-establishing wsjtx log
#WSJTX_config
Reino Talarmo
Bill, Hi John, As Bill told they should not be in the save directory, but in the same directory where the save directory is, see User Guide ‘15.1. File locations’ that states Log directory: %LOCALAPPDATA%\WSJT-X\ An easy way to go there is via menu File – Open log directory 73, Reino OH3mA
|
|
|
