|
Tim
Yes understand low SWR still can cause RF in the shack. I am trying to track down, but not that simple to find. I believe that is the issue but finding it is almost overwhelming, especially since the same computers and radios never had this before.
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: WSJT Sensitivity V MSHV #why ?
Mike G0LQI
Hi Derek,
I've done some more testing on 6 m and 10 m and my conclusion is that, in general, they both get the same number of decodes. Very occasionally MSHV gets one or two more than WSJT-X, but more often WSJT-X gets more. Forgive me for asking, but have you got the decode depths set the same in both programs? 73 Mike G0LQI PS My rig is an IC7600 - so has similar Icom audio codec to the IC7610.
|
|
|
|
Charles Suckling
Hi Ken Its all in the Quick Start Guide. Basically the installer puts the WSJT-X and MAP65 executables in the same bin folder. MAP65 does not go in your existing MAP65 directory. 73 Charlie G3WDG
On Mon, 7 Jun 2021 at 07:21, Ken Arck <ken@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
locked
#map65 #Cat_RigControl
#Cat_RigControl
#map65
Mick
Hi,
I upgraded to MAP65 V3.0 on the weekend and use it with microham USB Interface III for the TX path. Anyway I was using COM 10 for PTT on WSJT-X which worked fine. With MAP65 I get a “Can not open COM port 10” error. When I changed the PTT port to COM 4 the PTT port it worked AOK. I have had this in the past where some programs need the COM to be less than 10? Not sure if this is a bug but I am sure others may have the same issue.
The COM ports are virtual ports. Machine is a 9th gen i7 running Win10.
Thanks for the upgrade - looking forward to taking it for a spin. Cheers Mick VK2CMP
|
|
|
|
I'm a bit late to the game but I downloaded WSJT-X 2.5.0-rc1 and ran the installer but I never am prompted about installing MAP65 nor has my existing MAP65 installation changed. So what am I doing wrong? Ken
At 02:31 PM 6/2/2021, you wrote:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
|
|
|
|
I'm a bit late to the game but I downloaded WSJT-X 2.5.0-rc1 and ran the installer but I never am prompted about installing MAP65 nor has my existing MAP65 installation changed.
So what am I doing wrong? Ken At 02:31 PM 6/2/2021, you wrote: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed------------------------------------------------------------------------------ President and CTO - Arcom Controllers Makers of repeater controllers and accessories. https://www.arcomcontrollers.com/ Authorized Dealers for Kenwood and Telewave. We offer complete turn-key repeater packages! AH6LE/R - IRLP Node 3000 http://www.irlp.net "We don't just make 'em. We use 'em!" []
|
|
|
|
I'm a bit late to the game but I downloaded WSJT-X 2.5.0-rc1 and ran the installer but I never am prompted about installing MAP65 nor has my existing MAP65 installation changed.
So what am I doing wrong? Ken At 02:31 PM 6/2/2021, you wrote: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed------------------------------------------------------------------------------ President and CTO - Arcom Controllers Makers of repeater controllers and accessories. https://www.arcomcontrollers.com/ Authorized Dealers for Kenwood and Telewave. We offer complete turn-key repeater packages! AH6LE/R - IRLP Node 3000 http://www.irlp.net "We don't just make 'em. We use 'em!" []
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: WSJT Sensitivity V MSHV #why ?
Derek Brown
Ok chaps, WSJT started before MSHV and sampling set at 48Khz, input level +30 with control from USB output of IC7610, quick test on 10m after a couple of periods, it would seem that WSJT and MSHV are about the same, but back on 6M, two weakish signals on 6M decoded on MSHV, but nothing decoded or seem in the waterfall on WSJT !! I can see noise on the waterfall on WSJT but no signals, I do see the same amount of noise on the waterfall of MSHV, but I do see and decode signals, weird, will probably continue to use both but maybe WSJT for HF and MSHV for 6M, will do some comparisions on 144 Mhz as well. BTW the PC is a Win 10 i5 processer,16 G ram and 1TB hd, if that helps, generic sound board though I guess, though that would all be software ? as I/O are via USB. Derek G8ECI
On Sunday, 6 June 2021, 21:48:00 BST, Joe Subich, W4TV <lists@...> wrote:
> I as said, even running WSJT-X (2.4) and MSHV at > that same time ( it does seem to work) I received more decodes on MSHV > than WSJT, so I cannot see input signal levels playing a part. *DOES NOT MATTER* It depends entirely on what the application expects for audio input. The fact that you do not see anything on the WSJTX waterfall indicates that you have the audio input level set too low for WSJTX. Follow the audio set-up instructions in the WSJTX documentation to set "no signal" band noise from your transceiver to +30. Start WSJTX *BEFORE* any other digital software and make sure your sound card is set to 48 KHz sample rate *NOT* 44.1 KHz. It's all in the documentation. 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 2021-06-06 1:02 PM, Derek Brown via groups.io wrote: > Hi Joe, > > I would agree, but MSHV is using the exactly same connection (USB Codec) > from the 7610 into the same sound card, without altering any of the > settings in the 7610 ! I as said, even running WSJT-X (2.4) and MSHV at > that same time ( it does seem to work) I received more decodes on MSHV > than WSJT, so I cannot see input signal levels playing a part. > > Derek G8ECI > > On Sunday, 6 June 2021, 15:47:12 BST, Joe Subich, W4TV > <lists@...> wrote: > > > On 2021-06-06 9:01 AM, Derek Brown via groups.io wrote: > > > in some instances I cannot even seen the signals on the waterfall on > > WSJT-X, but i can hear them on the speaker of the IC7610, > > Sounds like you do not have the audio levels set up properly. > > 73, > > ... Joe, W4TV > > > On 2021-06-06 9:01 AM, Derek Brown via groups.io wrote: > > Hi Mike, > > Well I tried it again this morning, both in parallel in the same RX > cycle on 6M and MSHV always gets more decodes than WSJT-X, in some > instances I cannot even seen the signals on the waterfall on WSJT-X, but > i can hear them on the speaker of the IC7610, I will try and do a screen > save of one or two RX cycles to show what I am getting, the RX signal > into WSJT is in the green around 30 to 40 and in th green on MHSV, at > least this morning I worked 9K2, A71, A45 and A65 on 6m allin auto > sequence, on MSHV, but I did check WSJT, but there was no decodes from > them there !!! Weird. Same radio, same PC just different programs. > > 73 Derek G8ECI > > > > On Sunday, 6 June 2021, 13:05:35 BST, Mike G0LQI via groups.io > <mfmhb9=yahoo.com@groups.io <mailto:yahoo.com@groups.io>> wrote: > > > > Hi Derek, > > Just out of curiosity, I ran MSHV in parallel with WSJT-X on 10 m > just now, getting about a dozen decodes each cycle. I found that MSHV > never got more decodes and that every two or three cycles, WSJT-X got > one or two more low S/N signals. > > 73 Mike G0LQI > > > > > > > > > > >
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: WSJT Sensitivity V MSHV #why ?
Jim Brown
Interesting. last season, many of us found that on 6M, JTDX often provided decodes that WSJT-X missed. I don't know of any users of MSHV out here (NorCal), and I've never tried it.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
73, Jim K9YC
On 6/6/2021 3:33 AM, Mike G0LQI via groups.io wrote:
Hi Derek,
|
|
|
|
Dave Garber
What os are you using? Is the log linked with wsjt? How much memory in you pc?
Hi,I have trouble at time on FT-8 where it stops decoding.I was told to get a better clock as I was using Windows.I use Dimension and it improved quite a biit.But if I adjust my sound card levels or turn the tuning dial sometimes it stops decoding.Most times my clock is dead on.At most it is .02s off but big improvement from 2-3secs from when I was using Windows.Also if I have FT-8 open and move to my logger or another program it causes an issue.The only thing that helps is to close and reopen FT8.
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: WSJT Sensitivity V MSHV #why ?
Joe Subich, W4TV
I as said, even running WSJT-X (2.4) and MSHV at*DOES NOT MATTER* It depends entirely on what the application expects for audio input. The fact that you do not see anything on the WSJTX waterfall indicates that you have the audio input level set too low for WSJTX. Follow the audio set-up instructions in the WSJTX documentation to set "no signal" band noise from your transceiver to +30. Start WSJTX *BEFORE* any other digital software and make sure your sound card is set to 48 KHz sample rate *NOT* 44.1 KHz. It's all in the documentation. 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 2021-06-06 1:02 PM, Derek Brown via groups.io wrote: Hi Joe,
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: WSJT Sensitivity V MSHV #why ?
Gary - AG0N
On Jun 6, 2021, at 07:01, Derek Brown via groups.io <g8eci@...> wrote:It would seem to me that if you can hear it on the speaker, you should see it on the waterfall. I suspect you don’t have your waterfall parameters set correctly. Every installation is different. I can see things on the waterfall that I can only intermittently hear in the headphones. The waterfall sees signals I don’t hear. It also sees signals that are below decode threshold if you set it sensitive enough. Gary - AG0N
|
|
|
|
locked
VS: [WSJTX] 2.5.0 RC1 - No receive after transmit - rig control disables RX on Yaesu FTDX-3000 VFO A running split
#IssueReport
Reino Talarmo
>To be clear - the 'walking' is not an issue or concern at this time - I am only interested in resolving the inability to RX every other cycle when using RIG control method. Hi Mark,
Now I repeated exactly that ”feature”. Mode needs to be set to *None* to make it work so that every second band change opens reception and the first, third, fifth … band change kills reception or was it other way round, hi!. I tested v2.5.0-rc1 and v2.4.0, both same behaviour of course. I loaded v2.3.0 and did not have that problem with Mode set to None, but I did not liked the band change sequence as relays said each time tiku-tiku-tik. The v2.5.0-rc1 sounds much better. So there is a welcomed improvement in Hamlib in that respect.
73, Reino OH3mA
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: #BugReport - Issue with mode FT8 Rpt Rcvd field logging NOT CORRECT for stations calling with TX2 reply
#IssueReport
Joe Subich, W4TV
Simple ... don't answer/work stations that fail to call with TX1!
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
73, ... Joe, W4TV
On 2021-06-06 1:04 PM, 5H1FF Frans wrote:
First of all I want to compliment you all with the great software WSJT-X that I am using with much pleasure.
|
|
|
|
locked
#Cat_RigControl
#Cat_RigControl
James Quick
I am running MacOS Big Sur and it upgraded and my wsjt-x v2.4.0 and all was good until the upgrade. Now it will start running ok and will work ok on the freq that it is on at startup but will not change freq. Say it starts up on 30M and I try to go to 20M it will try to change and go right back to 30 M. I have reinstalled v2.3.1 and it works great. Any help or advice would be appreciated.
Jim Quick / N4ule Ex KA4BEG jimn4ule@gmail n4ule@...
|
|
|
|
locked
#BugReport - Issue with mode FT8 Rpt Rcvd field logging NOT CORRECT for stations calling with TX2 reply
#IssueReport
5H1FF Frans
First of all I want to compliment you all with the great software WSJT-X that I am using with much pleasure.
I am using FT8 mode with WSJT-X version 2.4.0 on Windows 10 PC in combination with a Yaesu FT950 and HRD for the logging. All working fine, except for one thing: If stations are responding with TX2 (in stead of TX1) and you answer them by double click on their call, the final signal logging of "Rpt Rcvd" is INCORRECT or stays empty. The best way I can reproduce this is (after a fresh startup of WSJT-X) by calling CQ and wait until a station comes back with TX2 (and not TX1). If you answer this station the report field for "Rpt Rcvd" stays empty! However also during normal operation when you answer a station that calls with only TX2, the "Rpt Rcvd" seems to be filled with the last "correct" signal of the previous TX1 answering station before. This last one is tricky, because you have to be aware if logging is done with the correct signal report for "Rpt Rcvd". Therefore almost always I have to correct the report for logging of my own received signal strength it the station called via TX2. Hereby a screen-print of the CQ calling situation after a complete fresh startup of the WSJT-X instance:  If stations are calling and I stop and start the WSJT-X instance shortly, a similar situation is occurring, see:  I would be glad if you could change this in a new version, it saves a lot of corrections of the received signal strength from all the stations that are not complying to answering with TX1 but TX2. 73's Frans 5H1FF
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: WSJT Sensitivity V MSHV #why ?
Derek Brown
Hi Joe, I would agree, but MSHV is using the exactly same connection (USB Codec) from the 7610 into the same sound card, without altering any of the settings in the 7610 ! I as said, even running WSJT-X (2.4) and MSHV at that same time ( it does seem to work) I received more decodes on MSHV than WSJT, so I cannot see input signal levels playing a part. Derek G8ECI
On Sunday, 6 June 2021, 15:47:12 BST, Joe Subich, W4TV <lists@...> wrote:
On 2021-06-06 9:01 AM, Derek Brown via groups.io wrote: > in some instances I cannot even seen the signals on the waterfall on > WSJT-X, but i can hear them on the speaker of the IC7610, Sounds like you do not have the audio levels set up properly. 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 2021-06-06 9:01 AM, Derek Brown via groups.io wrote: > Hi Mike, > Well I tried it again this morning, both in parallel in the same RX cycle on 6M and MSHV always gets more decodes than WSJT-X, in some instances I cannot even seen the signals on the waterfall on WSJT-X, but i can hear them on the speaker of the IC7610, I will try and do a screen save of one or two RX cycles to show what I am getting, the RX signal into WSJT is in the green around 30 to 40 and in th green on MHSV, at least this morning I worked 9K2, A71, A45 and A65 on 6m allin auto sequence, on MSHV, but I did check WSJT, but there was no decodes from them there !!! Weird. Same radio, same PC just different programs. > 73 Derek G8ECI > > On Sunday, 6 June 2021, 13:05:35 BST, Mike G0LQI via groups.io <mfmhb9=yahoo.com@groups.io> wrote: > > Hi Derek, > Just out of curiosity, I ran MSHV in parallel with WSJT-X on 10 m just now, getting about a dozen decodes each cycle. I found that MSHV never got more decodes and that every two or three cycles, WSJT-X got one or two more low S/N signals. > 73 Mike G0LQI >
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: Map65 3.0 does not work in Win XP
#WindowsXP
Jeff Stillinger
There is some advantage. While true that Windows 7 is no longer
supported, that is actually an advantage for dedicated task specific
machines. The connection to the "mother ship" is severed and none
of those pesky updates that destroy configurations, or reboot the
machine with software running that is performing a needed task.
Most of the runtime packages will run with manual install.
Granted, I would not surf the web or put any critical information on
the machine, but personally, I would never do critical work with any
Microsoft product.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
A Windows 7 box running WSJT-X, FLDigi, perhaps the latest version of Log4OM (task specific to ham radio) will do great. At this point, because MS is no longer supporting it. They are not even worried about activating the copy, so it's basically the way every operating system should be. Free. PS - I downgraded a Windows 10 box to Windows 7 because I got tired of Windows 10 rebooting and dropping the GRLevel3 radar feed to my web site. Since the downgrade, the machine has not been rebooted in 4 months. Just sits there are runs GRLevel3 feeding the web site 24/7/365.
On 6/6/21 3:36 AM, Bill Somerville
wrote:
On 05/06/2021 14:18, K5DOG wrote: --
Jeff Stillinger - KB6IBB KB6IBB Laboratories Wylie, Texas - United States http://kb6ibb-15.ham-radio-op.net/Ham-Radio/
|
|
|
|
locked
Re: 2.5.0 RC1 - No receive after transmit - rig control disables RX on Yaesu FTDX-3000 VFO A running split
#IssueReport
To be clear - the 'walking' is not an issue or concern at this time - I am only interested in resolving the inability to RX every other cycle when using RIG control method when operating Split.
Walking has been resolved.
|
|
|
|
Carlos
Am 06.06.21, 10:13 schrieb Bill Somerville <g4wjs@...>:
|
|
|