locked
Rig Failure
#Cat_RigControl
Walter Egenmaier <wegenmaier@...>
I am trying WSJTX 2.3.1 for the first time with latest N3FJP (ACL ver 7.01), WIN 10, 64 bit laptop, and FT-991A (with internal modem).
I have never used WSJTX software before, but do use N3FJP and since it is compatible, I though I would try to set this up on my rig for FT8. As you can see by the attachment, I have several rig failures. Any suggestions on how to fix. I am set up on COM7 using VSPE (Virtual Serial Port Emulator software) which does work with my ACL from N3FJP. The ACL software has rig control and it reads the freq on my rig perfectly. So not sure what my next step should be. I did get band activity that wasn't there before, so not sure how that happened. I'm on USB 7.074 MHz. Appreciate any help to get me started. Walt / WB4ZUT 73s
|
|
locked
#GeneralGroupInfo SLOW TO DECODE.
#GeneralGroupInfo
As I stated earlier wsjt-x is slow to decode. Like double decoding.
Appreciate the help -- Thanks 73's de NU4N/Dave
|
|
locked
VS: [WSJTX] Problem with SCU 17 CAT control on FT450D
#Cat_RigControl
Reino Talarmo
And I have Data/Pkt as-well-as Fake-It for the split.
Hi Bob, You should not have those jumps as you are using Fake-it as it uses a single VFO only. Have you tried Rig for the split? I am using FTdx3000 and it also rattles with Rig for the split. 73 Reino, OH3mA
|
|
locked
VS: [WSJTX] #GeneralGroupInfo Problem Decoding.
#GeneralGroupInfo
Reino Talarmo
I am running the latest version. I have been using Dimension as may time syn for years.Today I am getting Double decoding ?? I am making contacts. My computer has enuf horsepower to decode quickly. Any thoughts ?? Hi Dave,
|
|
locked
Re: Problem with SCU 17 CAT control on FT450D
#Cat_RigControl
Hello Austin,
Saturday, May 22, 2021, 1:39:38 PM, you wrote: ---------------------------------------------------- My settings are as follows: Rig: Yaesu FT450---------------------------------------------------- Hi Austin. I also have an active FT450 working with wsjtx though I am using FLRig as "Radio" in the WSJTx settings .... My settings are RTS not CAT, as the FT450 seems to like RTS And I have Data/Pkt as-well-as Fake-It for the split. Am also using the SCU-17 happily with the FT-450. I just tested a few QRG changes inside the WSJTx pull-down and didn't see any jump from A->B->A -- Best regards, Bob KD7YZ -- -- Bob KD7YZ in NE Kentucky
|
|
locked
#GeneralGroupInfo Problem Decoding.
#GeneralGroupInfo
I am running the latest version. I have been using Dimension as may time syn for years.Today I am getting Double decoding ?? I am making contacts. My computer has enuf horsepower to decode quickly. Any thoughts ??
-- Thanks 73's de NU4N/Dave
|
|
Tom V. Segalstad
Hi Mike
There is an app for PC, and for mobile phone (at least for Android type phones), which is able to decipher a number of digital modes. It is called «SignalID» for «Automatic Radio Signal Identification».
SignalID can at this time recognize the following digital modes: RTTY (85 Hz, 170 Hz, 450 Hz, 850 Hz, and amateur 170 Hz). STANAG 4285 (GEN, SYS3000 FEC, 8PSK, TFC, IDLE, SYS3000). FT4 FT8
The authors of this app are working to include more kinds of digital modes. And there may be other apps doing this digital deciphering also?
The SignalID app can be downloaded from «Google Play» or from the following web sites:https://github.com/Neosama/SignalID or https://apkpure.com/signalid-automatic-radio-signal-identification/com.tortillum.signalid
When you start the app, you will see a button labeled «0 – 30 MHz», hence it is set for HF and frequencies below. If you press that button, the SignalID app will work for modes used from 30 MHz and upwards in frequency. You get more info by pressing the «+» button in the upper left corner of the screen. See the copy of the screen in the picture below.
73 and good luck from Tom, LA4LN
Fra: Mike
This may be a stupid question - But in scouring the bands I hear so many data signals and I look for a possible decode based on what I think they sound like. As Im predominately a 2M up and we've already removed modes from WSJT-X (JT6M
FSK441 for example but not in MSHV) and there are limited modes I struggle to identify them and as some are meteor pings its hard to go back over the recording if one was made and replay and decode it.
-- Tom (LA4LN)
|
|
Andy Talbot
And now, having just modded the PIC code to generate Q65 Pure tones, no noise - NO DECODING whatsoever, ever, never, to the extent I was pointlessly chasing up errors in the code and wasted over an hour of my life :-( Add in some noise and straight decodes, So the Q65 decoder, unlike the JT4 one, needs background noise. Andy
On Sat, 22 May 2021 at 17:09, Andy Talbot <andy.g4jnt@...> wrote:
|
|
Mike
This may be a stupid question - But in scouring the bands I hear so many data signals and I look for a possible decode based on what I think they sound like. As Im predominately a 2M up and we've already removed modes from WSJT-X (JT6M FSK441 for example but not in MSHV) and there are limited modes I struggle to identify them and as some are meteor pings its hard to go back over the recording if one was made and replay and decode it.
So my question is - is it possible to have a receive only system that will run through all the modes and give a predicted match. I understand that all the protocols and code is probably available but today my programming skills are diminishing (too old) so lets see if anyone out there can provide a solution Id like to help in any way I can. Mike GD6ICR
|
|
locked
Cannot use /P in callsign when using JT65 and JT9 modes
#JT65
#JT9
#IssueReport
Hello to all, I would like to mention a strange behavior regarding the use of a specific type 1 suffix in the callsign. The list of type 1 suffixes indicates that /P is a valid type 1 suffix: When /P is used in callsign on JT65 and JT9 modes, the /P suffix is present in all generated messages so there is no room for the third word (reports, RRR and 73) to be transmitted. The Tx1 is transmitted normally as G1ABC SV1GRB/P The Tx2 instead of G1ABC SV1GRB -15 is transmitted as G1ABC SV1GRB/P The Tx3 instead of G1ABC SV1GRB R -15 is transmitted as G1ABC SV1GRB/P The Tx4 instead of G1ABC SV1GRB RRR is transmitted as G1ABC SV1GRB/P The Tx5 instead of G1ABC SV1GRB 73 is transmitted as G1ABC SV1GRB/P The Tx6 is transmitted normally as CQ SV1GRB/P When using another type 1 suffix such as /3, the suffix is correctly present only in TX1 and TX6 and everything is transmitted FB. Currently using version is 2.3.1. 73 Haris SV1GRB
|
|
locked
Cannot use /P in callsign when using JT65 and JT9 modes
#JT65
#JT9
#IssueReport
Hello to all, I would like to mention a strange behavior regarding the use of a specific type 1 suffix in the callsign. The list of type 1 suffixes indicates that /P is a valid type 1 suffix: When /P is used in callsign on JT65 and JT9 modes, the /P suffix is present in all generated messages so there is no room for the third word (reports, RRR and 73) to be transmitted. The Tx1 is transmitted normally as G1ABC SV1GRB/P The Tx2 instead of G1ABC SV1GRB -15 is transmitted as G1ABC SV1GRB/P The Tx3 instead of G1ABC SV1GRB R -15 is transmitted as G1ABC SV1GRB/P The Tx4 instead of G1ABC SV1GRB RRR is transmitted as G1ABC SV1GRB/P The Tx5 instead of G1ABC SV1GRB 73 is transmitted as G1ABC SV1GRB/P The Tx6 is transmitted normally as CQ SV1GRB/P When using another type 1 suffix such as /3, the suffix is correctly present only in TX1 and TX6 and everything is transmitted FB. Currently using version is 2.3.1. 73 Haris SV1GRB
|
|
Bob K4RCG
RR Martin. It is an interesting project. 73 de Bob K4RCG
On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 1:44 AM Roland <roland@...> wrote: Thanks Bob, currently reaching out to HAM Radio Clubs around the world to draw some interest and to promote the new Project. I already made a post on the Wsprnet.org forum.
|
|
OK, time for this discussion to END.
73 -Jim NU0C On Sun, 23 May 2021 02:48:42 +0000 (UTC) "K8BL BOB LIDDY" <k8bl@...> wrote: it's selfish andinconsiderate
|
|
K8BL BOB LIDDY <k8bl@...>
Bill, Thanks for pointing those things out. Yes, there are many helpful and often necessary things provided when an answering Station is gracious enough to provide their Grid. That's why it's selfish and inconsiderate to answer merely with TX2 to save themselves a few seconds of turnaround. 73, Bob K8BL
On Saturday, May 22, 2021, 10:17:28 PM EDT, Bill, WB6JJJ <bill@...> wrote:
The grid allows WSJT-X to show their beam heading so I can turn the antenna. Also, JTAlert will quickly / automatically provide their name and grid. But the grid displayed in JTAlert (from QRZ.com) isn’t always their correct grid… Bill WB6JJJ On May 22, 2021, at 6:41 PM, K8BL BOB LIDDY <k8bl@...> wrote:
|
|
The grid allows WSJT-X to show their beam heading so I can turn the antenna. Also, JTAlert will quickly / automatically provide their name and grid. But the grid displayed in JTAlert (from QRZ.com) isn’t always their correct grid… Bill WB6JJJ
On May 22, 2021, at 6:41 PM, K8BL BOB LIDDY <k8bl@...> wrote:
|
|
Thanks Bob, currently reaching out to HAM Radio Clubs around the world to draw some interest and to promote the new Project. I already made a post on the Wsprnet.org forum.
Much appreciated if you could spread the message to anyone who is interested. The Project website can be found here https://github.com/HB9VQQ/WSPRBeacon just as a reminder. 73 fer now Roland
|
|
K8BL BOB LIDDY <k8bl@...>
IMHO... I consider it rude and inconsiderate to purposely avoid using the proper protocol that was specifically designed to provide the Grid to the station you are calling just to save a few seconds of turnaround between timeslots. The software was designed such that CQ'ing Stations call using TX6 and answering Stations respond with TX1, including their Grid. If you answer someone's CQ by using improper protocol, you are purposely refusing to provide them with info that they may be seeking by being on the radio in the first place. You are refusing to tell them your Grid, which they may be collecting for various Awards, and you are refusing to give them an indication of your location, which would tell them where their signal is reaching. You might as well give them a crude gesture at the same time. In many instances, that forces the CQ Station to look up your info on-line before they'll log it in WSJT and/or their Station Log. That effort takes more time than the 15 seconds saved by NOT providing your Grid when rudely calling by using TX2! After reading all the comments here about using TX2 to call Stations and all the lame/weak excuses for doing so, I'm seriously considering NOT logging QSOs that call using TX2. I'll work them, but I think I won't Log them. That would be just as rude and inconsiderate. GL/73, Bob K8BL (Let the flaming begin. 3...2...1)
On Saturday, May 22, 2021, 04:54:00 PM EDT, Reino Talarmo <reino.talarmo@...> wrote:
|
|
K8BL BOB LIDDY <k8bl@...>
Lance... Vy Cool! TNX for sharing. Drive Safe! de Bob K8BL
On Saturday, May 22, 2021, 02:35:39 PM EDT, Lance Collister, W7GJ <w7gj@...> wrote:
I am on a month long road trip across the country on 6m from the
car, and I always call CQ with my current grid. Funny how many
people answer me ignoring my grid and assuming I am still in
Montana! But I always show where I am. Right now I am on the
road to eastern MASS. I sure have been impressed with some of the
6m Es openings to EU and AF that I have gotten in on with my 150w
and roof mounted Squalo! FT8 is very handy to use when driving
(especially when XYL is behind the wheel- HI!). GL and VY 73,
Lance On 5/21/2021 21:55, Larry Banks via
groups.io wrote:
|
|
Reino Talarmo
Hello Martin, you answered the important difference to many other operators, hi! So only some will know grid by just double clicking, I assume. As reminded in the text in the User Guide “reasonably stable”, I take it that they don’t change their locator often. 73, Reino OH3mA
Lähettäjä: main@WSJTX.groups.io [mailto:main@WSJTX.groups.io] Puolesta Martin G0HDB
On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 05:16 PM, Reino Talarmo wrote:
Hello Reino, whenever I work a new station, and often when I've copied a new one but haven't yet worked it, I use the 'Add' button to put the station's callsign and grid into the 'database' which is described thus in the WSJT-X User Guide:
|
|
locked
Problem with SCU 17 CAT control on FT450D
#Cat_RigControl
Austin 2E0MNV
Hi,
|
|