Bob K4RCG
As known, Q65 was not developed for 10m, but remains an interesting possibility. Testing today 28.135 MHz if anyone is around.
73 de Bob K4RCG
|
|
locked
Ubuntu 20.04 & wsjtx2.3.0 ALSA audio HW:x,y challenges
#AudioIssues
#linux
mike.j.kasper@...
I've spent WAY to much time trying to get WSJTX to share the audio input. The primary goal is to get FLDIGI & WSJTX to share an input for decoding, but utilizing the DSNOOP option or trying to directly access the HW audio results in: "Error in Sound Input Requested input audio format is not supported on device". Only using PLUGHW: "works"
I found that I have a USB microphone that does work with the DSNOOP, but both my radio USB audio card and the internal audio card refuse. Strange thing is, the USB microphone (snowball) ONLY support S16_LE, while the other cards support other formats. Audio card details: Card 0, ID `Digital', name `Shure Digital' Device 0, ID `USB Audio', name `USB Audio', 1 subdevices (1 available) 1..2 channels, sampling rate 8000..48000 Hz Sample formats: S8, S16_LE Subdevice 0, name `subdevice #0' Card 1, ID `Snowball', name `Blue Snowball' Device 0, ID `USB Audio', name `USB Audio', 1 subdevices (1 available) 1 channel, sampling rate 8000..48000 Hz Sample formats: S16_LE Subdevice 0, name `subdevice #0' Card 2, ID `PCH', name `HDA Intel PCH' Device 0, ID `ALC231 Analog', name `ALC231 Analog', 1 subdevices (1 available) 2 channels, sampling rate 44100..192000 Hz Sample formats: S16_LE, S32_LE Subdevice 0, name `subdevice #0' Any pointers on what format wsjtx is asking for and/or why these cards refuse direct hardware (aka requiring PLUGHW)???
|
|
locked
Re: program release WSJT-X 2.4.0-rc4
#linux
#IssueReport
#MSK144
Carlos
Hi to all,
Thanks für the new two program versions. On 2.4.0-rc4 I found out that in MSK144 the call is not copied to the standard messages wehen doubleclick on a CQ call. You have to double click the CQ call line in the Band Activity window. then Generate Std Msgs and the Enable TX. In my opinion I found it useful to take over the call in the Std Msgs. 73, TU, Karl OE3JAG
|
|
Hi friends
Thanks Joe and team for your work. Installed the -rc4 Version of WSJT-X 2.4.0 without problems. It was too late for checking on 6m - nobody there and moon already too high - but I made a fine Q65_60A QSO (terrestrial) over 700 km. Nothing visible in the waterfall, but in the spectrum it was. Will try EME receiving on 2m and 6m today. I came to having some minor "wishes" to the program concerning mainly the user interface and setup procedure. But this is secondary and I will address the items to the developpers directly. 73 de Christoph DF9CY --- Christoph Petermann DF9CY JO54al (Baltic Sea Coast) 50MHz 6 ele OP-DES Yagi - 270w 144MHz 9 ele DK7ZB - 330w https://www.df9cy.de
|
|
Andy Talbot
I've been sending a FST4W-900 signal for the last hour or so and monitoring WSPRNET for reports Some stations report the mode correctly as '15'. Others as '2' Is this caused in WSJT-X, or is it something at the the WSPRNET end ? Andy
|
|
locked
Re: WSJT-X using Mac OS Catalina
I have MacBook Pro (16-inch, 2019) and I am running Catalina 10.15.7. I am missing something when it comes to installing the Silicon Labs VCP Driver. I get down to the Guidance step, and select Open Security Preferences, but then I can't find anything anywhere in the security preferences that shows the message they show to look for ("System software from developer "Silicon Laboratories Inc" was blocked from loading"). I am sure that I missing something simple, but I can't figure out what. Can anyone tell me what I am missing?
|
|
Ed W2LCQ
Hi Tom,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I forgot to mention I’m using an Icom 7300 a very easy rig to work with. CAT and AFSK is done over one USB cable. The 7300 has a built in sound card. It is very stable. All I had to do was install the Icom driver into Windows which was a very easy download from Icom site. I use WSJT-X most of the time with DXLab Suite which does the logging. I also use it with N1MM+ for contests. Good luck. 73, de W2LCQ, Ed Jones ”New York is where I am.” —- James Dean
On Mar 26, 2021, at 6:38 PM, Tom Arny <tarny@...> wrote:
|
|
Tom Arny
Hi John,
|
|
locked
Re: 2.4 rc4 and FTDX101MP
#Cat_RigControl
On 26/03/2021 18:07, Buddy Morgan via
groups.io wrote:
Hi Buddy, so I can see what is happening, please put the attached file into the WSJT-X configuration files directory (on MS Windows the configuration files directory is the same one as the log file directory "Menu->File->Open log directory"). Then restart WSJT-X, execute the minimum steps to reproduce the issue, then quit WSJT-X. It will have created a file on your Desktop called WSJT-X_RigControl.log , send me that file for analysis (g4wjs <at> classdesign <dot> com). Once you have sent the log file you can delete the log file from your Desktop, and delete the log configuration file to return to normal WSJT-X operation. 73
|
|
On 26/03/2021 18:09, Bruce KX4AZ wrote:
Now and then I see a poor little WSPR signal coming in just outside of the 1400-1600 Hz standard bandwidth, so it won't be decoded as far as I understand. Wondering if there is any kind of setting in WSJTx that would allow me to pad the upper/lower audio edges, say to add an extra 20 Hz on each end?Hi Bruce, are you sure it is WSPR? FST4W signals can often be found near the WSPR sub-bands. 73 Bill G4WJS.
|
|
Andy Talbot
The PIC/DDS beacon source is now running, and it's being tested on air for the first time with FSTW-120, -300 and now -900 There's just have one issue to sort out. I generate the Gaussian glide by using just two adjacent symbols and adding their weighted components based on a lookup table, sampled at 64* the sample rate. Doing it like that means each session starts half a symbol late. For the faster modes this doesn't matter, it's less than a second on DT. On FSTW-900 the resulting delay of half a symbol is 2.8 seconds - which the decoder seems able to cope with but on -1800 the delay, DT, becomes 5.6 seconds which doesn't work. I can sort this by doing the job properly, and adding weighted versions of three symbols, last, this and next. A few more lines of code, but easy enough to do and.. as I write ... just checked WSPRNET, and there's a decode of the first -900 signal off air. It works ! Andy
|
|
locked
Re: No Tx audio after inactivity.
#AudioIssues
Pete Singleton
Hi Phil, I understand the USB port may need 'power management'. I'd already turned that off. This is about the driver software that uses the port. Why does that ALSO need power management? 73 PeteS
|
|
Now and then I see a poor little WSPR signal coming in just outside of the 1400-1600 Hz standard bandwidth, so it won't be decoded as far as I understand. Wondering if there is any kind of setting in WSJTx that would allow me to pad the upper/lower audio edges, say to add an extra 20 Hz on each end?
Of course I could simply shift the entire slot up/down by changing my receiver frequency, but then I would be chopping signals at one of the ends.
|
|
locked
Re: 2.4 rc4 and FTDX101MP
#Cat_RigControl
Buddy Morgan
Downloaded 2.4 rc4. It works fine with my IC 9700 and my IC 7100. Still can't get any version of 2.4 to work with my FTDX101MP. 2.2 worked fine with the FTDX101MP. I tried an early version of 2.3 and it did not work with the '101.
I get the following error message,from 2.4 rc4:
Hamlib error: Feature not implemented
newcat_set_freq: special_60m=0, 60m freq=0, is_ftdx3000=0 newcat.c(784):newcat_set_freq return(-4) rig.c(1724):rig_set_freq return(-4) while setting frequency Timestamp: 2021-03-26T16:37:57.789Z I would really like to get it working with my FTDX101. I am using Windows 10, on a HP All-In-One. I have not changed any settings on either the radio or the WSJT software.
Any ideas?
Buddy WB4OMG
|
|
Kermit Lehman
I'm apparently the only W1 person (actually signing up, at least) who's doing any digital KA6LMS/1 operating. All FT4/8. I enjoy it, so I'll keep at it.
The problem is one left for the log checkers at KA6LMS Central.
This weekend the SSB bands will be full of the WPX-SSB contingent.
73,
Ken, AB1J, KA6LMS/1
-----Original Message-----
From: John KC4LZN <kc4lzn@...> To: ktfrog007@... Cc: main@WSJTX.groups.io <main@wsjtx.groups.io> Sent: Fri, Mar 26, 2021 3:50 pm Subject: Re: [WSJTX] Conflicts with KA6LMS Stations #FT8 Thanks Ken.
I may have to stick to sideband and CW then.
73
John
KC4LZN On Fri, Mar 26, 2021, 11:39 <ktfrog007@...> wrote:
|
|
Hasan Schiers N0AN
Installed, running, watching new averaging behavior. Seems more sensitive, but may be an illusion. Needs many more runs to get a feel for it. 120E sync now proper (Red Line) Tnx as always, will pound on it tomorrow morning. 73, N0AN Hasan
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 10:34 AM Joe <joe@...> wrote: We are pleased to announce two new releases of program WSJT-X: a General
|
|
Hi Paul,
that's great, please apologize for the
issue, they should be able to work around it with a little care.
Have a great w/e with the LMS op.
73
Bill G4WJS.
On 26/03/2021 16:10, Paul Braun wrote:
|
|
Paul Braun
Good morning.
I'm on the KA6LMS team. I just shared the comments with them. I'm not one who's using FT8, but hopefully the ones who are can sort it out on our end. Thanks for the heads-up.
On 3/26/21 10:51 : , Bill Somerville
wrote:
-- Paul Braun WD9GCO Amateur Radio Newsline Anchor ARNewsline.org Certified Music Junkie "Music washes from the soul the dust of everyday life." -- Berthold Auerbach "Never follow anyone. Be your own hero." -- Neil Peart
|
|
Hi John,
yes that would certainly cause issues
if one of the K6LMS stations is calling CQ on the same band at the
same time as another is working stations.
73
Bill G4WJS.
On 26/03/2021 16:02, John KC4LZN wrote:
|
|
Thanks Bill. They may want to uncheck the Call 1st box. 73 John KC4LZN
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021, 11:51 Bill Somerville <g4wjs@...> wrote:
|
|