Date   

locked Re: Query...

blitz716
 

Yes, I saw that and will go grab the new one.
Where I'm having trouble is I see NO MODES called JT9-anything. Are these the JT4-a thru Jt4-G?
That alone would shed a bunch of light on my frustrations.

flash1van wrote:


Steve: I didn't see any other postings to your question.  I am by no means an expert, but, this site is about the new WSJTX that is designed for MF and LF.  WSJT9 is a different group of modes.  I just made my first JT9-2 contact on 1.8395 last night and another contact on JT9.1 today on 10.130... You will need to download WSJTX to get the new stuff.  It is pretty cool.  Be prepared for a long qso if you use the higher numbers.  The numbers represent the time it takes for a single transmission but have respectively narower bandwidths and are suited for pulling signals out way below the noise level... I hope that helps.  FYI there are not a lot of people on these modes yet so don't get frustrated if it takes a while to make a contact. there was another message with the link for the new WSJTX that came  out today... 



de N8YOH sk

--- In WSJTX@..., blitz716  wrote:
  
Hello all,
Ive got WSJT 9 setup, and it looks much like the V7 I have.

What modes are we talking about here? I hate to sound stupid, but from
what Ive been reading on this list, I see everything from "Its like
JT65, its been renamed to Iscat", and connotations like JT9 which
doesn't appear in the mode list. I notice the additions of modes are
this JT4-A thru G
What exact modulation scheme (on WSJT9 are we trying presently, and i'll
be happy to listen and try.)
You guys are a light year ahead of me, and its difficult to play catch-up.
A bit of translation would be helpful to me.
1.8 mhz is real is noisy here, Ill prob have to confine myself to 30
meters for now until winter quiets things down, but I will try.
A gameplan too if you dont mind? Something like, What exact freq are we
going to try on what band?

thanks, hoping to partipate....Steve KC2UK

    



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WSJTX/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WSJTX/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    WSJTX-digest@... 
    WSJTX-fullfeatured@...

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    WSJTX-unsubscribe@...

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

  


locked Re: Query...

blitz716
 

Heck John, I think I'm stupid on this one, I'm also playing with ROS, and wow talk about a lot of NON-information "so much you read quickly can" groan...
I used the WSJT7 on WSPR and JT65 before, I know the author knows what he's doing, communicating THAT to this brain here is the prob...Hi..

John Simon wrote:

Take your time and enjoy the ride Steve.  I like to monitor with the programme of choice before I TX.
 


John de VK2XGJ
Women and cats will do as they please,
men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea!


 
From: blitz716
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 11:21 AM
Subject: [WSJTX] Query...
 


Hello all,
Ive got WSJT 9 setup, and it looks much like the V7 I have.

What modes are we talking about here? I hate to sound stupid, but from what Ive been reading on this list, I see everything from "Its like JT65, its been renamed to Iscat", and connotations like JT9 which doesn't appear in the mode list. I notice the additions of modes are this JT4-A thru G
What exact modulation scheme (on WSJT9 are we trying presently, and i'll be happy to listen and try.)
You guys are a light year ahead of me, and its difficult to play catch-up.
A bit of translation would be helpful to me.
1.8 mhz is real is noisy here, Ill prob have to confine myself to 30 meters for now until winter quiets things down, but I will try.
A gameplan too if you dont mind? Something like, What exact freq are we going to try on what band?

thanks, hoping to partipate....Steve KC2UK


locked Re: Query...

John Simon <jrsimon@...>
 

Take your time and enjoy the ride Steve.  I like to monitor with the programme of choice before I TX.
 


John de VK2XGJ
Women and cats will do as they please,
men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea!


 

From: blitz716
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 11:21 AM
Subject: [WSJTX] Query...
 


Hello all,
Ive got WSJT 9 setup, and it looks much like the V7 I have.

What modes are we talking about here? I hate to sound stupid, but from what Ive been reading on this list, I see everything from "Its like JT65, its been renamed to Iscat", and connotations like JT9 which doesn't appear in the mode list. I notice the additions of modes are this JT4-A thru G
What exact modulation scheme (on WSJT9 are we trying presently, and i'll be happy to listen and try.)
You guys are a light year ahead of me, and its difficult to play catch-up.
A bit of translation would be helpful to me.
1.8 mhz is real is noisy here, Ill prob have to confine myself to 30 meters for now until winter quiets things down, but I will try.
A gameplan too if you dont mind? Something like, What exact freq are we going to try on what band?

thanks, hoping to partipate....Steve KC2UK


locked Re: Query...

flash1van
 

Steve: I didn't see any other postings to your question. I am by no means an expert, but, this site is about the new WSJTX that is designed for MF and LF. WSJT9 is a different group of modes. I just made my first JT9-2 contact on 1.8395 last night and another contact on JT9.1 today on 10.130... You will need to download WSJTX to get the new stuff. It is pretty cool. Be prepared for a long qso if you use the higher numbers. The numbers represent the time it takes for a single transmission but have respectively narower bandwidths and are suited for pulling signals out way below the noise level... I hope that helps. FYI there are not a lot of people on these modes yet so don't get frustrated if it takes a while to make a contact. there was another message with the link for the new WSJTX that came out today...



de N8YOH sk

--- In WSJTX@..., blitz716 <blitz716@...> wrote:

Hello all,
Ive got WSJT 9 setup, and it looks much like the V7 I have.

What modes are we talking about here? I hate to sound stupid, but from
what Ive been reading on this list, I see everything from "Its like
JT65, its been renamed to Iscat", and connotations like JT9 which
doesn't appear in the mode list. I notice the additions of modes are
this JT4-A thru G
What exact modulation scheme (on WSJT9 are we trying presently, and i'll
be happy to listen and try.)
You guys are a light year ahead of me, and its difficult to play catch-up.
A bit of translation would be helpful to me.
1.8 mhz is real is noisy here, Ill prob have to confine myself to 30
meters for now until winter quiets things down, but I will try.
A gameplan too if you dont mind? Something like, What exact freq are we
going to try on what band?

thanks, hoping to partipate....Steve KC2UK


locked Re: log

flash1van
 

Well, I did a search for all 3 and they do not show up anywhere. That is why I was asking the default location. So again, does anyone know where these logs are supposed to go. I have 2 saved but can't find then...:(

--- In WSJTX@..., MICHEL LUZERNE <micheluze@...> wrote:


C:&#92;WSJTX
There is wsjtx_rx.log.txt and wsjtx_tx.log.txt and wsjt.log.txt73 Michel To: WSJTX@...
From: flash1van@...
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 18:56:20 +0000
Subject: [WSJTX] log


























does anyone know the default location for the log?


locked Query...

blitz716
 

Hello all,
Ive got WSJT 9 setup, and it looks much like the V7 I have.

What modes are we talking about here? I hate to sound stupid, but from what Ive been reading on this list, I see everything from "Its like JT65, its been renamed to Iscat", and connotations like JT9 which doesn't appear in the mode list. I notice the additions of modes are this JT4-A thru G
What exact modulation scheme (on WSJT9 are we trying presently, and i'll be happy to listen and try.)
You guys are a light year ahead of me, and its difficult to play catch-up.
A bit of translation would be helpful to me.
1.8 mhz is real is noisy here, Ill prob have to confine myself to 30 meters for now until winter quiets things down, but I will try.
A gameplan too if you dont mind? Something like, What exact freq are we going to try on what band?

thanks, hoping to partipate....Steve KC2UK


locked WSJTX new version 0.4 r 2731

Jerry SP1JPQ <jerry@...>
 


locked Re: log

Michel
 

C:\WSJTX
There is wsjtx_rx.log.txt and wsjtx_tx.log.txt and wsjt.log.txt
73 Michel 

To: WSJTX@...
From: flash1van@...
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 18:56:20 +0000
Subject: [WSJTX] log

 
does anyone know the default location for the log?



locked log

flash1van
 

does anyone know the default location for the log?


locked Re: 30m Band Utilization Chart update: 10 November 2012

Ian Wade G3NRW <g3nrw-radio@...>
 

Aw shucks, gee, thanks Dave. The check/cheque is in the mail.

--
73
Ian, G3NRW


___Original Message_________________________________________
From: g3zxx <g3zxx.mail@...>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 Time: 12:45:32

Hi Ian, G3NRW.

This is probably one of the most useful documents produced by anyone, including national societies, etc.,

Thanks for all your efforts in producing and maintaining the document.

Cheers & 73's
Dave, G3ZXX.


locked 1st contact JT9-2

flash1van
 

WA8EJH Larry in IL.... Wahoo, Thanks Larry, great fun :) Now I know what I am looking at and slooooow is right

N8YOH k


locked JT9-2 on 1.839.5

flash1van
 

TX 2nd running at 1299. Never made a contact on this mode. Working on a 160M loop at 32 feet 45W out...
N8YOH cq


locked Re: just a thought

John Simon <jrsimon@...>
 

Here's an early one of mine.





John de VK2XGJ
Guns don't kill people
Driver's on mobile phones do!

-----Original Message-----
From: DAVID
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 7:15 AM
To: WSJTX@...
Subject: [WSJTX] just a thought

gentlemen....

think it would be nice if everyone would upload to the photo page an image file of their qsl.

please use only jpg or jp2 compression, and use only 640x480 to keep the files small as possible.

david/wd4kpd





------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links


locked cq 2300z 1839.5 jt9-2 tuesday

David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD <wd4kpd@...>
 

hey all....

cq is now running on 1839.5 jt9-2 second period @ 1w

david/wd4kpd


--
God's law is set in stone..everything else is negotiable.


locked just a thought

DAVID <wd4kpd@...>
 

gentlemen....

think it would be nice if everyone would upload to the photo page an image file of their qsl.

please use only jpg or jp2 compression, and use only 640x480 to keep the files small as possible.

david/wd4kpd


locked 160m poll

DAVID <wd4kpd@...>
 

the 160m qrg poll is coming along ala-bit slowly.

so far 1839 & 1839.5 are most popular. i suspect this is because of the qrm from jt65.

will be closing poll by the holiday, so please vote. the outcome is of course not binding in any way, but if you wish less qrm, the popular choice would seem to the best.

as an aside, the qrg on 30m seems to have defaulted to 10.130 all by itself. i will not be holdiing a 30m poll.

please vote on 160m soonest.

david/wd4kpd


locked Re: 30m Band Utilization Chart update: 10 November 2012

g3zxx
 

Hi Ian, G3NRW.

This is probably one of the most useful documents produced by anyone, including national societies, etc.,

Thanks for all your efforts in producing and maintaining the document.

Cheers & 73's
Dave, G3ZXX.

--- In WSJTX@..., Ian Wade G3NRW <g3nrw-radio@...> wrote:

30m Band Utilization Chart update: 10 November 2012

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/wadei/30m_band_utilization.htm


--
73
Ian, G3NRW

The 30m Band Utilization Chart:
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/wadei/30m_band_utilization.htm

>

>

>

>

>


locked Re: Pole...

g3zxx
 

Hi Andy,

At least we finally made it on 30m.

There is still just a few of us, so I'm sure that activity will improve in time, as Joe gets the software really singing, and more individuals have a go.

Cheers & 73's
Dave, G3ZXX.

--- In WSJTX@..., "ve9dx" <ve9dx@...> wrote:

Just on JT9-1 a short time but in 2 nights of listening much above 1838 plus 1500 hz is useless here. Due to a local noise.
About a half dozen in the log so far on 160 between 1838 plus 1400 and 1600 hz.
Also ran a few Europeans on 10.130 around noon time in the plus 1400 to 1500 hz area.
Haven't found JT9-1 on any other bands yet so will look forward to hearing what is being used where on the other bands.
K1CF just asked me to try JT9-2 - works - talk about long and drawn out though.
Sloooooooooow
Will be around 1838 plus 1500 most of the evening...
73 Andy (VE9DX)


locked New in the group

sp1jpq <jerry@...>
 

Hi all.

I regularly use JT65 on HF and VHF.
Of course, I turned immediately in testing new Digimode JT9.
Unfortunately I do not have an antenna for 160 meters, so try to do the 3.5, 7, 10 MHz.

Two days ago, make first DX SQO on 10.130 with VE9DX.
IMHO WSJTX software is very promising, but it still contains a lot of errors and requires a lot of work.

Best regards, 73
Jerry
SP1JPQ & SO1D (contest call)


locked Re: 160m skeds

Bob Myers <w1xt@...>
 


On Nov 12, 2012, at 7:41 PM, "kj4qdz" <nervous@...> wrote:

I am on 1.3895 now. I'll be there for a while if you can make it.


Assume 1839.5 kHz dial freq. I'll be around after about 0400Z. Thanks.  --W1XT

38141 - 38160 of 38175