toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I enjoy the occasional rag chewing on PSK 31, but have more difficulty making QSOs, especially DX. My own lack of experience I suspect.
On Dec 14, 2021, at 5:42 PM, chas cartmel <chas@...> wrote:
Let’s also not forget about JT9 and JT65, PSK variations and many other data modes which allow conversational QSOs rather than click/exchange reports/log - rinse and repeat.
Stay safe out there
From: main@WSJTX.groups.io [mailto:main@WSJTX.groups.io]
On Behalf Of David Maihofer
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2021 6:28 PM
Subject: Re: [WSJTX] Don't forget about FT4 #FT4 #QSO_practices
I agree with your FT4 statement, seems many new users opt for FT8 as everything is shifted towards that. I think I would rather user FT4 most of the time saving half the time.
There just does not seem to be a reason not too except that all the activity is on FT8.
Thanks for bringing that up.
73 de David, in NW Arkansas
On Dec 14, 2021, at 07:33, Timothy Brannon <timbmd@...> wrote:
I like to get on 40 meters in the predawn hours (US Central Time), but most mornings are absolute bedlam on 7074 kHz. The FT8 waterfall is so full of strong signals, I can hardly find a clear spot to transmit.
So, I often click Mode in WSJT-X and switch to FT4 on 7047.5 kHz, but the problem there is the opposite -- the waterfall is completely empty! I did just complete a contact with VK2LAW with nice -12 dB signals both ways, but
then my 25 CQ calls went unanswered.
Remember, with FT4 you're only giving up 3.5 dB of sensitivity, but the SNR is much better without the crowding/QRM, and contacts are completed in half the time. I wish more people would try FT4 in the morning, and relieve the congestion on FT8. Come try it!
73 de Tim, WA5MD in Dallas
This email has been scanned by BullGuard antivirus protection.