locked Re: CQ instead of 73 #FT8

Bill Somerville

On 17/02/2021 17:59, Ken WB8UFC wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 12:49 PM, Ken WB8UFC wrote:
I'll try deferring the logging and see if that makes a difference.
Nope. No difference.

I didn't log and it WSJT-X still sent the 73 in response to the second RR73.
I then double-clicked on the RR73 at 175430 and WSJT-X then sent the second CQ at 175446.
The 73 at 175441 I did manually.


the only reasonable replies to an RR73 message are either nothing, a 73 message, or some free text message sending extra information. If your QSO partner elects to send an RR73 message in reply to your R+report message then they should not expect any reply.


Join main@WSJTX.groups.io to automatically receive all group messages.